Antisense modulation of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble expression

ABSTRACT

Antisense compounds, compositions and methods are provided for modulating the expression of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble. The compositions comprise antisense compounds, particularly antisense oligonucleotides, targeted to nucleic acids encoding superoxide dismutase 1, soluble. Methods of using these compounds for modulation of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble expression and for treatment of diseases associated with expression of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble are provided.

SEQUENCE LISTING

The present application includes a Sequence Listing in electronicformat. The Sequence Listing is provided as a file entitledRTS0242USC7SEQ_ST25.txt, created Feb. 24, 2015, which is 108 Kb in size.The information in the electronic format of the sequence listing isincorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides compositions and methods for modulatingthe expression of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble. In particular, thisinvention relates to compounds, particularly oligonucleotides,specifically hybridizable with nucleic acids encoding superoxidedismutase 1, soluble. Such compounds have been shown to modulate theexpression of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The superoxide anion (O₂ ⁻) is a potentially harmful cellular by-productproduced primarily by errors of oxidative phosphorylation inmitochondria (Cleveland and Liu, Nat. Med., 2000, 6, 1320-1321). Some ofthe targets for oxidation by superoxide in biological systems includethe iron-sulfur dehydratases, aconitase and fumarases. Release of Fe(II)from these superoxide-inactivated enzymes results in Fenton-typeproduction of hydroxyl radicals which are capable of attacking virtuallyany cellular target, most notably DNA (Fridovich, Annu. Rev. Biochem.,1995, 64, 97-112).

The enzymes known as the superoxide dismutases (SODs) provide defenseagainst oxidative damage of biomolecules by catalyzing the dismutationof superoxide to hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) (Fridovich, Annu. Rev.Biochem., 1995, 64, 97-112). Two major classes of superoxide dismutasesexist. One consists of a group of enzymes with active sites containingcopper and zinc while the other class has either manganese or iron atthe active site (Fridovich, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1995, 64, 97-112).

The soluble superoxide dismutase 1 enzyme (also known as SOD1 and Cu/Znsuperoxide dismutase) contains a zinc- and copper-type active site(Fridovich, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1995, 64, 97-112). Lee et al. reportedthe molecular cloning and high-level expression of human cytoplasmicsuperoxide dismutase gene in E. coli in 1990 (Lee et al., MisaengmulHakhoechi, 1990, 28, 91-97).

Mutations in the superoxide dismutase 1 gene are associated with adominantly-inherited form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, alsoknown as Lou Gehrig's disease) a disorder characterized by a selectivedegeneration of upper and lower motor neurons (Cleveland and Liu, Nat.Med., 2000, 6, 1320-1321). The deleterious effects of various mutationson superoxide dismutase 1 are most likely mediated through a gain oftoxic function rather than a loss of superoxide dismutase 1 activity, asthe complete absence of superoxide dismutase 1 in mice neitherdiminishes life nor provokes overt disease (Al-Chalabi and Leigh, Curr.Opin. Neurol., 2000, 13, 397-405; Alisky and Davidson, Hum. Gene Ther.,2000, 11, 2315-2329). According to Cleveland and Liu, there are twomodels for mutant superoxide dismutase 1 toxicity (Cleveland and Liu,Nat. Med., 2000, 6, 1320-1321). The “oxidative hypothesis” ascribestoxicity to binding of aberrant substrates such as peroxynitrite orhydrogen peroxide which gain access to the catalytic copper ion throughmutation-dependent loosening of the native superoxide dismutase 1protein conformation (Cleveland and Liu, Nat. Med., 2000, 6, 1320-1321).A second possible mechanism for mutant superoxide dismutase 1 toxicityinvolves the misfolding and aggregation of mutant superoxide dismutase 1proteins (Cleveland and Liu, Nat. Med., 2000, 6, 1320-1321). The ideathat aggregates contribute to ALS has received major support from theobservation that murine models of superoxide dismutase 1 mutant-mediateddisease feature prominent intracellular inclusions in motor neurons and,in some cases, in the astrocytes surrounding them as well (Bruijn etal., Science, 1998, 281, 1851-1854). Furthermore, Brujin et al. alsodemonstrate that neither elimination nor elevation of wild-typesuperoxide dismutase 1 was found to affect disease induced by mutantsuperoxide dismutase 1 in mice (Bruijn et al., Science, 1998, 281,1851-1854).

The superoxide dismutase 1 gene is localized to chromosome 21q22.1 andhas been found to be overexpressed in the brains of patients with Downsyndrome, possibly as a reflection of the trisomic state of chromosome21 (Gulesserian et al., J. Investig. Med., 2001, 49, 41-46).

Studies of transgenic mice carrying a mutant human superoxide dismutase1 gene have been used to evaluate potential therapies for ALS and onesuch study has indicated that creatine produced a dose-dependentimprovement in motor performance and extended survival in micecontaining the glycine 93 to alanine mutation (Klivenyi et al., Nat.Med., 1999, 5, 347-350). Although creatine is currently suggested as adietary supplement for patients with ALS, the protective effect ofcreatine in humans has yet to be confirmed (Rowland, J. Neurol. Sci.,2000, 180, 2-6).

Additional transgenic mice studies have led to the finding thatoxidative reactions triggered by superoxide dismutase 1 mutants resultin inactivation of the glial glutamate transporter (Human GLUT1) whichin turn, causes neuronal degeneration (Trotti et al., Nat. Neurosci.,1999, 2, 427-433).

Inhibition of superoxide dismutase 1 through copper chelation or zincsupplementation extends the life of mice that overexpress a mutant formsuperoxide dismutase by 1 to 2 months (Hottinger et al., Eur. J.Neurosci., 1997, 9, 1548-1551). As reviewed by Alisky and Davidson, anumber of pharmacological agents have been used to inhibit the toxicityof superoxide dismutase 1 mutants in the transgenic mouse model forhuman ALS, including: vitamin E, riluzole, gabapentin, caspaseinhibitors, nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, glutamate receptorinhibitors and glutathione (Alisky and Davidson, Hum. Gene Ther., 2000,11, 2315-2329). In addition, investigational gene therapy for ALS hasincluded overexpression of a number of genes which provide protectionfrom superoxide dismutase 1 mutant toxicity (Alisky and Davidson, Hum.Gene Ther., 2000, 11, 2315-2329).

Two abnormal superoxide dismutase 1 mRNAs, exon 2-skipping and exon 2and 3-skipping species, were identified from occipital brain tissue ofALS patients carrying no mutations in the superoxide dismutase 1 gene(Kawata et al., NeuroReport, 2000, 11, 2649-2653).

Disclosed and claimed in PCT publication WO 94/19493 are oligonucleotidesequences encoding SOD1 and generally claimed is the use of an antisenseDNA homolog of a gene encoding SOD1 in either mutant and wild-type formsin the preparation of a medicament for treating a patient with a disease(Brown et al., 1994).

The expression of superoxide dismutase 1 in PC12 rat pheochromocytomaneuronal cells was inhibited by either of two 1-mer antisenseoligonucleotides targeting rat superoxide dismutase 1 nucleotides 54-74and 497-517, leading to cellular apoptosis. The progression of cellulardeath was reversed by treatment with antioxidants (Troy and Shelanski,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1994, 91, 6384-6387).

The method of delivery of the previously described oligonucleotides tothe rat PC12 cells (Troy and Shelanski, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,1994, 91, 6384-6387) was subsequently improved by linking theoligonucleotides to a vector peptide via a disulfide bond (Troy et al.,J. Neurosci., 1996, 16, 253-261).

Induction of apoptosis was also seen in studies using a 30-merphosphorothioate oligonucleotide targeting the start codon of superoxidedismutase 1 in rat spinal cord cultures in vitro (Rothstein et al.,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1994, 91, 4155-4159).

Mutations of the superoxide dismutase 1 gene have been unambiguouslyimplicated in ALS. However, investigational therapies involvinginhibition of these mutants have yet to be tested as therapeuticprotocols. Furthermore, evidence suggests that inhibition of thewild-type superoxide dismutase gene is not deleterious to organisms(Bruijn et al., Science, 1998, 281, 1851-1854). Consequently thereremains a long felt need for agents capable of effectively andselectively inhibiting superoxide dismutase 1 function.

Antisense technology is emerging as an effective means for reducing theexpression of specific gene products and may therefore prove to beuniquely useful in a number of therapeutic, diagnostic, and researchapplications for the modulation of superoxide dismutase 1 expression.

The present invention provides compositions and methods for modulatinghuman superoxide dismutase 1 expression, including modulation ofalternatively spliced forms of superoxide dismutase 1.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to compounds, particularly antisenseoligonucleotides, which are targeted to a nucleic acid encodingsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble, and which modulate the expression ofsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble. Pharmaceutical and other compositionscomprising the compounds of the invention are also provided. Furtherprovided are methods of modulating the expression of superoxidedismutase 1, soluble in cells or tissues comprising contacting saidcells or tissues with one or more of the antisense compounds orcompositions of the invention. Further provided are methods of treatingan animal, particularly a human, suspected of having or being prone to adisease or condition associated with expression of superoxide dismutase1, soluble by administering a therapeutically or prophylacticallyeffective amount of one or more of the antisense compounds orcompositions of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a bar graph showing inhibition of superoxide dismutase 1,soluble (SOD-1) mRNA in the rat cervical spinal cord afterintraventricular administration of ISIS 146192, a SOD-1 antisenseoligonucleotide. Sod=SOD-1. PTEN was used to show that ISIS 146192 isspecific for SOD-1 and does not decrease levels of PTEN mRNA. mRNAlevels were normalized to ribogreen.

FIG. 2 is a bar graph showing inhibition of SOD-1 mRNA in the ratcervical spinal cord after intraventricular administration of ISIS146192. mRNA levels were normalized to β-actin.

FIG. 3 is a bar graph showing inhibition of SOD-1 mRNA in the righttemporal parietal section of the rat brain after intraventricularadministration of ISIS 146192. mRNA levels were normalized to ribogreen.

FIG. 4 is a bar graph showing inhibition of SOD-1 mRNA in the righttemporal parietal section of the rat brain after intraventricularadministration of ISIS 146192. mRNA levels were normalized to β-actin.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention employs oligomeric compounds, particularlyantisense oligonucleotides, for use in modulating the function ofnucleic acid molecules encoding superoxide dismutase 1, soluble,ultimately modulating the amount of superoxide dismutase 1, solubleproduced. This is accomplished by providing antisense compounds whichspecifically hybridize with one or more nucleic acids encodingsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble. As used herein, the terms “targetnucleic acid” and “nucleic acid encoding superoxide dismutase 1,soluble” encompass DNA encoding superoxide dismutase 1, soluble, RNA(including pre-mRNA and mRNA) transcribed from such DNA, and also cDNAderived from such RNA. The specific hybridization of an oligomericcompound with its target nucleic acid interferes with the normalfunction of the nucleic acid. This modulation of function of a targetnucleic acid by compounds which specifically hybridize to it isgenerally referred to as “antisense”. The functions of DNA to beinterfered with include replication and transcription. The functions ofRNA to be interfered with include all vital functions such as, forexample, translocation of the RNA to the site of protein translation,translation of protein from the RNA, splicing of the RNA to yield one ormore mRNA species, and catalytic activity which may be engaged in orfacilitated by the RNA. The overall effect of such interference withtarget nucleic acid function is modulation of the expression ofsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble. In the context of the presentinvention, “modulation” means either an increase (stimulation) or adecrease (inhibition) in the expression of a gene. In the context of thepresent invention, inhibition is the preferred form of modulation ofgene expression and mRNA is a preferred target.

It is preferred to target specific nucleic acids for antisense.“Targeting” an antisense compound to a particular nucleic acid, in thecontext of this invention, is a multistep process. The process usuallybegins with the identification of a nucleic acid sequence whose functionis to be modulated. This may be, for example, a cellular gene (or mRNAtranscribed from the gene) whose expression is associated with aparticular disorder or disease state, or a nucleic acid molecule from aninfectious agent. In the present invention, the target is a nucleic acidmolecule encoding superoxide dismutase 1, soluble. The targeting processalso includes determination of a site or sites within this gene for theantisense interaction to occur such that the desired effect, e.g.,detection or modulation of expression of the protein, will result.Within the context of the present invention, a preferred intragenic siteis the region encompassing the translation initiation or terminationcodon of the open reading frame (ORF) of the gene. Since, as is known inthe art, the translation initiation codon is typically 5′-AUG (intranscribed mRNA molecules; 5′-ATG in the corresponding DNA molecule),the translation initiation codon is also referred to as the “AUG codon,”the “start codon” or the “AUG start codon”. A minority of genes have atranslation initiation codon having the RNA sequence 5′-GUG, 5′-UUG or5′-CUG, and 5′-AUA, 5′-ACG and 5′-CUG have been shown to function invivo. Thus, the terms “translation initiation codon” and “start codon”can encompass many codon sequences, even though the initiator amino acidin each instance is typically methionine (in eukaryotes) orformylmethionine (in prokaryotes). It is also known in the art thateukaryotic and prokaryotic genes may have two or more alternative startcodons, any one of which may be preferentially utilized for translationinitiation in a particular cell type or tissue, or under a particularset of conditions. In the context of the invention, “start codon” and“translation initiation codon” refer to the codon or codons that areused in vivo to initiate translation of an mRNA molecule transcribedfrom a gene encoding superoxide dismutase 1, soluble, regardless of thesequence(s) of such codons.

It is also known in the art that a translation termination codon (or“stop codon”) of a gene may have one of three sequences, i.e., 5′-UAA,5′-UAG and 5′-UGA (the corresponding DNA sequences are 5′-TAA, 5′-TAGand 5′-TGA, respectively). The terms “start codon region” and“translation initiation codon region” refer to a portion of such an mRNAor gene that encompasses from about 25 to about 50 contiguousnucleotides in either direction (i.e., 5′ or 3′) from a translationinitiation codon. Similarly, the terms “stop codon region” and“translation termination codon region” refer to a portion of such anmRNA or gene that encompasses from about 25 to about 50 contiguousnucleotides in either direction (i.e., 5′ or 3′) from a translationtermination codon.

The open reading frame (ORF) or “coding region,” which is known in theart to refer to the region between the translation initiation codon andthe translation termination codon, is also a region which may betargeted effectively. Other target regions include the 5′ untranslatedregion (5′UTR), known in the art to refer to the portion of an mRNA inthe 5′ direction from the translation initiation codon, and thusincluding nucleotides between the 5′ cap site and the translationinitiation codon of an mRNA or corresponding nucleotides on the gene,and the 3′ untranslated region (3UTR), known in the art to refer to theportion of an mRNA in the 3′ direction from the translation terminationcodon, and thus including nucleotides between the translationtermination codon and 3′ end of an mRNA or corresponding nucleotides onthe gene. The 5′ cap of an mRNA comprises an N7-methylated guanosineresidue joined to the 5′-most residue of the mRNA via a 5′-5′triphosphate linkage. The 5′ cap region of an mRNA is considered toinclude the 5′ cap structure itself as well as the first 50 nucleotidesadjacent to the cap. The 5′ cap region may also be a preferred targetregion.

Although some eukaryotic mRNA transcripts are directly translated, manycontain one or more regions, known as “introns,” which are excised froma transcript before it is translated. The remaining (and thereforetranslated) regions are known as “exons” and are spliced together toform a continuous mRNA sequence. mRNA splice sites, i.e., intron-exonjunctions, may also be preferred target regions, and are particularlyuseful in situations where aberrant splicing is implicated in disease,or where an overproduction of a particular mRNA splice product isimplicated in disease. Aberrant fusion junctions due to rearrangementsor deletions are also preferred targets. It has also been found thatintrons can also be effective, and therefore preferred, target regionsfor antisense compounds targeted, for example, to DNA or pre-mRNA.

Once one or more target sites have been identified, oligonucleotides arechosen which are sufficiently complementary to the target, i.e.,hybridize sufficiently well and with sufficient specificity, to give thedesired effect.

In the context of this invention, “hybridization” means hydrogenbonding, which may be Watson-Crick, Hoogsteen or reversed Hoogsteenhydrogen bonding, between complementary nucleoside or nucleotide bases.For example, adenine and thymine are complementary nucleobases whichpair through the formation of hydrogen bonds. “Complementary,” as usedherein, refers to the capacity for precise pairing between twonucleotides. For example, if a nucleotide at a certain position of anoligonucleotide is capable of hydrogen bonding with a nucleotide at thesame position of a DNA or RNA molecule, then the oligonucleotide and theDNA or RNA are considered to be complementary to each other at thatposition. The oligonucleotide and the DNA or RNA are complementary toeach other when a sufficient number of corresponding positions in eachmolecule are occupied by nucleotides which can hydrogen bond with eachother. Thus, “specifically hybridizable” and “complementary” are termswhich are used to indicate a sufficient degree of complementarity orprecise pairing such that stable and specific binding occurs between theoligonucleotide and the DNA or RNA target. It is understood in the artthat the sequence of an antisense compound need not be 100%complementary to that of its target nucleic acid to be specificallyhybridizable. An antisense compound is specifically hybridizable whenbinding of the compound to the target DNA or RNA molecule interfereswith the normal function of the target DNA or RNA to cause a loss ofutility, and there is a sufficient degree of complementarity to avoidnon-specific binding of the antisense compound to non-target sequencesunder conditions in which specific binding is desired, i.e., underphysiological conditions in the case of in vivo assays or therapeutictreatment, and in the case of in vitro assays, under conditions in whichthe assays are performed.

Antisense and other compounds of the invention which hybridize to thetarget and inhibit expression of the target are identified throughexperimentation, and the sequences of these compounds are hereinbelowidentified as preferred embodiments of the invention. The target sitesto which these preferred sequences are complementary are hereinbelowreferred to as “active sites” and are therefore preferred sites fortargeting. Therefore another embodiment of the invention encompassescompounds which hybridize to these active sites.

Antisense compounds are commonly used as research reagents anddiagnostics. For example, antisense oligonucleotides, which are able toinhibit gene expression with exquisite specificity, are often used bythose of ordinary skill to elucidate the function of particular genes.Antisense compounds are also used, for example, to distinguish betweenfunctions of various members of a biological pathway. Antisensemodulation has, therefore, been harnessed for research use.

For use in kits and diagnostics, the antisense compounds of the presentinvention, either alone or in combination with other antisense compoundsor therapeutics, can be used as tools in differential and/orcombinatorial analyses to elucidate expression patterns of a portion orthe entire complement of genes expressed within cells and tissues.

Expression patterns within cells or tissues treated with one or moreantisense compounds are compared to control cells or tissues not treatedwith antisense compounds and the patterns produced are analyzed fordifferential levels of gene expression as they pertain, for example, todisease association, signaling pathway, cellular localization,expression level, size, structure or function of the genes examined.These analyses can be performed on stimulated or unstimulated cells andin the presence or absence of other compounds which affect expressionpatterns.

Examples of methods of gene expression analysis known in the art includeDNA arrays or microarrays (Brazma and Vilo, FEBS Lett., 2000, 480,17-24; Celis, et al., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2-16), SAGE (serialanalysis of gene expression) (Madden, et al., Drug Discov. Today, 2000,5, 415-425), READS (restriction enzyme amplification of digested cDNAs)(Prashar and Weissman, Methods Enzymol., 1999, 303, 258-72), TOGA (totalgene expression analysis) (Sutcliffe, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A., 2000, 97, 1976-81), protein arrays and proteomics (Celis, etal., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2-16; Jungblut, et al., Electrophoresis,1999, 20, 2100-10), expressed sequence tag (EST) sequencing (Celis, etal., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2-16; Larsson, et al., J. Biotechnol., 2000,80, 143-57), subtractive RNA fingerprinting (SuRF) (Fuchs, et al., Anal.Biochem., 2000, 286, 91-98; Larson, et al., Cytometry, 2000, 41,203-208), subtractive cloning, differential display (DD) (Jurecic andBelmont, Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 2000, 3, 316-21), comparative genomichybridization (Carulli, et al., J. Cell Biochem. Suppl., 1998, 31,286-96), FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) techniques (Going andGusterson, Eur. J. Cancer, 1999, 35, 1895-904) and mass spectrometrymethods (reviewed in (To, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen, 2000, 3,235-41).

The specificity and sensitivity of antisense is also harnessed by thoseof skill in the art for therapeutic uses. Antisense oligonucleotideshave been employed as therapeutic moieties in the treatment of diseasestates in animals and man. Antisense oligonucleotide drugs, includingribozymes, have been safely and effectively administered to humans andnumerous clinical trials are presently underway. It is thus establishedthat oligonucleotides can be useful therapeutic modalities that can beconfigured to be useful in treatment regimes for treatment of cells,tissues and animals, especially humans.

In the context of this invention, the term “oligonucleotide” refers toan oligomer or polymer of ribonucleic acid (RNA) or deoxyribonucleicacid (DNA) or mimetics thereof. This term includes oligonucleotidescomposed of naturally-occurring nucleobases, sugars and covalentinternucleoside (backbone) linkages as well as oligonucleotides havingnon-naturally-occurring portions which function similarly. Such modifiedor substituted oligonucleotides are often preferred over native formsbecause of desirable properties such as, for example, enhanced cellularuptake, enhanced affinity for nucleic acid target and increasedstability in the presence of nucleases.

While antisense oligonucleotides are a preferred form of antisensecompound, the present invention comprehends other oligomeric antisensecompounds, including but not limited to oligonucleotide mimetics such asare described below. The antisense compounds in accordance with thisinvention preferably comprise from about 8 to about 50 nucleobases (i.e.from about 8 to about 50 linked nucleosides). Particularly preferredantisense compounds are antisense oligonucleotides, even more preferablythose comprising from about 12 to about 30 nucleobases. Antisensecompounds include ribozymes, external guide sequence (EGS)oligonucleotides (oligozymes), and other short catalytic RNAs orcatalytic oligonucleotides which hybridize to the target nucleic acidand modulate its expression.

While the preferred form of antisense compound is a single-strandedantisense oligonucleotide, in many species the introduction ofdouble-stranded structures, such as double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)molecules, has been shown to induce potent and specificantisense-mediated reduction of the function of a gene or its associatedgene products. This phenomenon occurs in both plants and animals and isbelieved to have an evolutionary connection to viral defense andtransposon silencing.

The first evidence that dsRNA could lead to gene silencing in animalscame in 1995 from work in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans (Guo andKempheus, Cell, 1995, 81, 611-620). Montgomery et al. have shown thatthe primary interference effects of dsRNA are posttranscriptional(Montgomery et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95, 15502-15507).The posttranscriptional antisense mechanism defined in Caenorhabditiselegans resulting from exposure to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) has sincebeen designated RNA interference (RNAi). This term has been generalizedto mean antisense-mediated gene silencing involving the introduction ofdsRNA leading to the sequence-specific reduction of endogenous targetedmRNA levels (Fire et al., Nature, 1998, 391, 806-811). Recently, it hasbeen shown that it is, in fact, the single-stranded RNA oligomers ofantisense polarity of the dsRNAs which are the potent inducers of RNAi(Tijsterman et al., Science, 2002, 295, 694-697). The use of thesedouble stranded RNA molecules (short interfering RNA or siRNA) fortargeting and inhibiting the expression of superoxide dismutase 1,soluble mRNA is also contemplated. These double stranded RNA moleculestarget regions similar to those targeted by antisense oligonucleotidesand have similar effects. These double stranded RNA molecules aregenerally 19-21 base pairs in length, but may range between 8 and 50nucleobases. The production of siRNA molecules is described in a generalsense in the examples provided below, but it will be appreciated thatany desired siRNA targeted to superoxide-1 dismutase, soluble may besynthesized by conventional oligonucleotide synthesis techniques. Oncethe sequence of the antisense strand is known, the complementary sensestrand is synthesized based on base pairing. The sense and antisensestrands are then combined to form the siRNA.

Oligomer and Monomer Modifications

As is known in the art, a nucleoside is a base-sugar combination. Thebase portion of the nucleoside is normally a heterocyclic base. The twomost common classes of such heterocyclic bases are the purines and thepyrimidines. Nucleotides are nucleosides that further include aphosphate group covalently linked to the sugar portion of thenucleoside. For those nucleosides that include a pentofuranosyl sugar,the phosphate group can be linked to either the 2′, 3′ or 5′ hydroxylmoiety of the sugar. In forming oligonucleotides, the phosphate groupscovalently link adjacent nucleosides to one another to form a linearpolymeric compound. In turn, the respective ends of this linearpolymeric compound can be further joined to form a circular compound,however, linear compounds are generally preferred. In addition, linearcompounds may have internal nucleobase complementarity and may thereforefold in a manner as to produce a fully or partially double-strandedcompound. Within oligonucleotides, the phosphate groups are commonlyreferred to as forming the internucleoside linkage or in conjunctionwith the sugar ring the backbone of the oligonucleotide. The normalinternucleoside linkage that makes up the backbone of RNA and DNA is a3′ to 5′ phosphodiester linkage.

Modified Internucleoside Linkages

Specific examples of preferred antisense oligomeric compounds useful inthis invention include oligonucleotides containing modified e.g.non-naturally occurring internucleoside linkages. As defined in thisspecification, oligonucleotides having modified internucleoside linkagesinclude internucleoside linkages that retain a phosphorus atom andinternucleoside linkages that do not have a phosphorus atom. For thepurposes of this specification, and as sometimes referenced in the art,modified oligonucleotides that do not have a phosphorus atom in theirinternucleoside backbone can also be considered to be oligonucleosides.

In the C. elegans system, modification of the internucleotide linkage(phosphorothioate) did not significantly interfere with RNAi activity.Based on this observation, it is suggested that certain preferredoligomeric compounds of the invention can also have one or more modifiedinternucleoside linkages. A preferred phosphorus containing modifiedinternucleoside linkage is the phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage.

Preferred modified oligonucleotide backbones containing a phosphorusatom therein include, for example, phosphorothioates, chiralphosphorothioates, phosphorodithioates, phosphotriesters,aminoalkyl-phosphotriesters, methyl and other alkyl phosphonatesincluding 3′-alkylene phosphonates, 5′-alkylene phosphonates and chiralphosphonates, phosphinates, phosphoramidates including 3′-aminophosphoramidate and aminoalkylphosphoramidates, thionophosphoramidates,thionoalkylphosphonates, thionoalkylphosphotriesters, selenophosphatesand boranophosphates having normal 3′-5′ linkages, 2′-5′ linked analogsof these, and those having inverted polarity wherein one or moreinternucleotide linkages is a 3′ to 3′, 5′ to 5′ or 2′ to 2′ linkage.Preferred oligonucleotides having inverted polarity comprise a single 3′to 3′ linkage at the 3′-most internucleotide linkage i.e. a singleinverted nucleoside residue which may be abasic (the nucleobase ismissing or has a hydroxyl group in place thereof). Various salts, mixedsalts and free acid forms are also included.

Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of theabove phosphorus-containing linkages include, but are not limited to,U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,687,808; 4,469,863; 4,476,301; 5,023,243; 5,177,196;5,188,897; 5,264,423; 5,276,019; 5,278,302; 5,286,717; 5,321,131;5,399,676; 5,405,939; 5,453,496; 5,455,233; 5,466,677; 5,476,925;5,519,126; 5,536,821; 5,541,306; 5,550,111; 5,563,253; 5,571,799;5,587,361; 5,194,599; 5,565,555; 5,527,899; 5,721,218; 5,672,697 and5,625,050, certain of which are commonly owned with this application,and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

In more preferred embodiments of the invention, oligomeric compoundshave one or more phosphorothioate and/or heteroatom internucleosidelinkages, in particular —CH₂—NH—O—CH₂—, —CH₂—N(CH₃)—O—CH₂— [known as amethylene (methylimino) or MMI backbone], —CH₂—O—N(CH₃)—CH₂—,—CH₂—N(CH₃)—N(CH₃)—CH₂— and —O—N(CH₃)—CH₂—CH₂— [wherein the nativephosphodiester internucleotide linkage is represented as—O—P(═O)(OH)—O—CH₂-]. The MMI type internucleoside linkages aredisclosed in the above referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,677. Preferredamide internucleoside linkages are disclosed in the above referencedU.S. Pat. No. 5,602,240.

Preferred modified oligonucleotide backbones that do not include aphosphorus atom therein have backbones that are formed by short chainalkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, mixed heteroatom and alkylor cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, or one or more short chainheteroatomic or heterocyclic internucleoside linkages. These includethose having morpholino linkages (formed in part from the sugar portionof a nucleoside); siloxane backbones; sulfide, sulfoxide and sulfonebackbones; formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; methylene formacetyland thioformacetyl backbones; riboacetyl backbones; alkene containingbackbones; sulfamate backbones; methyleneimino and methylenehydrazinobackbones; sulfonate and sulfonamide backbones; amide backbones; andothers having mixed N, O, S and CH₂ component parts.

Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of theabove oligonucleosides include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos.5,034,506; 5,166,315; 5,185,444; 5,214,134; 5,216,141; 5,235,033;5,264,562; 5,264,564; 5,405,938; 5,434,257; 5,466,677; 5,470,967;5,489,677; 5,541,307; 5,561,225; 5,596,086; 5,602,240; 5,610,289;5,602,240; 5,608,046; 5,610,289; 5,618,704; 5,623,070; 5,663,312;5,633,360; 5,677,437; 5,792,608; 5,646,269 and 5,677,439, certain ofwhich are commonly owned with this application, and each of which isherein incorporated by reference.

Oligomer Mimetics

Another preferred group of oligomeric compounds amenable to the presentinvention includes oligonucleotide mimetics. The term mimetic as it isapplied to oligonucleotides is intended to include oligomeric compoundswherein only the furanose ring or both the furanose ring and theinternucleotide linkage are replaced with novel groups, replacement ofonly the furanose ring is also referred to in the art as being a sugarsurrogate. The heterocyclic base moiety or a modified heterocyclic basemoiety is maintained for hybridization with an appropriate targetnucleic acid. One such oligomeric compound, an oligonucleotide mimeticthat has been shown to have excellent hybridization properties, isreferred to as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA). In PNA oligomericcompounds, the sugar-backbone of an oligonucleotide is replaced with anamide containing backbone, in particular an aminoethylglycine backbone.The nucleobases are retained and are bound directly or indirectly to azanitrogen atoms of the amide portion of the backbone. RepresentativeUnited States patents that teach the preparation of PNA oligomericcompounds include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,539,082;5,714,331; and 5,719,262, each of which is herein incorporated byreference. Further teaching of PNA oligomeric compounds can be found inNielsen et al., Science, 1991, 254, 1497-1500.

One oligonucleotide mimetic that has been reported to have excellenthybridization properties is peptide nucleic acids (PNA). The backbone inPNA compounds is two or more linked aminoethylglycine units which givesPNA an amide containing backbone. The heterocyclic base moieties arebound directly or indirectly to aza nitrogen atoms of the amide portionof the backbone. Representative United States patents that teach thepreparation of PNA compounds include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat.Nos. 5,539,082; 5,714,331; and 5,719,262, each of which is hereinincorporated by reference. Further teaching of PNA compounds can befound in Nielsen et al., Science, 1991, 254, 1497-1500.

PNA has been modified to incorporate numerous modifications since thebasic PNA structure was first prepared. The basic structure is shownbelow:

wherein

Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;

T₄ is hydrogen, an amino protecting group, —C(O)R₅, substituted orunsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl,substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl, alkylsulfonyl,arylsulfonyl, a chemical functional group, a reporter group, a conjugategroup, a D or L α-amino acid linked via the α-carboxyl group oroptionally through the ω-carboxyl group when the amino acid is asparticacid or glutamic acid or a peptide derived from D, L or mixed D and Lamino acids linked through a carboxyl group, wherein the substituentgroups are selected from hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy, carboxy, benzyl,phenyl, nitro, thiol, thioalkoxy, halogen, alkyl, aryl, alkenyl andalkynyl;

T₅ is —OH, —N(Z₁)Z₂, R₅, D or L α-amino acid linked via the α-aminogroup or optionally through the w-amino group when the amino acid islysine or ornithine or a peptide derived from D, L or mixed D and Lamino acids linked through an amino group, a chemical functional group,a reporter group or a conjugate group;

Z₁ is hydrogen, C₁-C₆ alkyl, or an amino protecting group;

Z₂ is hydrogen, C₁-C₆ alkyl, an amino protecting group,—C(═O)—(CH₂)_(n)-J-Z₃, a D or L α-amino acid linked via the α-carboxylgroup or optionally through the ω-carboxyl group when the amino acid isaspartic acid or glutamic acid or a peptide derived from D, L or mixed Dand L amino acids linked through a carboxyl group;

Z₃ is hydrogen, an amino protecting group, —C₁-C₆ alkyl, —C(═O)—CH₃,benzyl, benzoyl, or —(CH₂)_(n)—N(H)Z₁;

each J is O, S or NH;

R₅ is a carbonyl protecting group; and

n is from 2 to about 50.

Another class of oligonucleotide mimetic that has been studied is basedon linked morpholino units (morpholino nucleic acid) having heterocyclicbases attached to the morpholino ring. A number of linking groups havebeen reported that link the morpholino monomeric units in a morpholinonucleic acid. A preferred class of linking groups have been selected togive a non-ionic oligomeric compound. The non-ionic morpholino-basedoligomeric compounds are less likely to have undesired interactions withcellular proteins.

Morpholino-based oligomeric compounds are non-ionic mimics ofoligonucleotides which are less likely to form undesired interactionswith cellular proteins (Dwaine A. Braasch and David R. Corey,Biochemistry, 2002, 41(14), 4503-4510). Morpholino-based oligomericcompounds are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,506, issued Jul. 23,1991. The morpholino class of oligomeric compounds have been preparedhaving a variety of different linking groups joining the monomericsubunits.

Morpholino nucleic acids have been prepared having a variety ofdifferent linking groups (L₂) joining the monomeric subunits. The basicformula is shown below:

wherein

T₁ is hydroxyl or a protected hydroxyl;

T₅ is hydrogen or a phosphate or phosphate derivative;

L₂ is a linking group; and

n is from 2 to about 50.

A further class of oligonucleotide mimetic is referred to ascyclohexenyl nucleic acids (CeNA). The furanose ring normally present inan DNA/RNA molecule is replaced with a cyclohenyl ring. CeNA DMTprotected phosphoramidite monomers have been prepared and used foroligomeric compound synthesis following classical phosphoramiditechemistry. Fully modified CeNA oligomeric compounds and oligonucleotideshaving specific positions modified with CeNA have been prepared andstudied (see Wang et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 8595-8602). Ingeneral the incorporation of CeNA monomers into a DNA chain increasesits stability of a DNA/RNA hybrid. CeNA oligoadenylates formed complexeswith RNA and DNA complements with similar stability to the nativecomplexes. The study of incorporating CeNA structures into naturalnucleic acid structures was shown by NMR and circular dichroism toproceed with easy conformational adaptation. Furthermore theincorporation of CeNA into a sequence targeting RNA was stable to serumand able to activate E. Coli RNase resulting in cleavage of the targetRNA strand.

The general formula of CeNA is shown below:

wherein

each Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;

T₁ is hydroxyl or a protected hydroxyl; and

T2 is hydroxyl or a protected hydroxyl.

Another class of oligonucleotide mimetic (anhydrohexitol nucleic acid)can be prepared from one or more anhydrohexitol nucleosides (see,Wouters and Herdewijn, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1999, 9, 1563-1566) andwould have the general formula:

A further preferred modification includes Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs) inwhich the 2′-hydroxyl group is linked to the 4′ carbon atom of the sugarring thereby forming a 2′-C,4′-C-oxymethylene linkage thereby forming abicyclic sugar moiety. The linkage is preferably a methylene (—CH₂—)_(n)group bridging the 2′ oxygen atom and the 4′ carbon atom wherein n is 1or 2 (Singh et al., Chem. Commun., 1998, 4, 455-456). LNA and LNAanalogs display very high duplex thermal stabilities with complementaryDNA and RNA (Tm=+3 to +10 C), stability towards 3′-exonucleolyticdegradation and good solubility properties. The basic structure of LNAshowing the bicyclic ring system is shown below:

The conformations of LNAs determined by 2D NMR spectroscopy have shownthat the locked orientation of the LNA nucleotides, both insingle-stranded LNA and in duplexes, constrains the phosphate backbonein such a way as to introduce a higher population of the N-typeconformation (Petersen et al., J. Mol. Recognit., 2000, 13, 44-53).These conformations are associated with improved stacking of thenucleobases (Wengel et al., Nucleosides Nucleotides, 1999, 18,1365-1370).

LNA has been shown to form exceedingly stable LNA:LNA duplexes (Koshkinet al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 13252-13253). LNA:LNAhybridization was shown to be the most thermally stable nucleic acidtype duplex system, and the RNA-mimicking character of LNA wasestablished at the duplex level. Introduction of 3 LNA monomers (T or A)significantly increased melting points (Tm=+15/+11) toward DNAcomplements. The universality of LNA-mediated hybridization has beenstressed by the formation of exceedingly stable LNA:LNA duplexes. TheRNA-mimicking of LNA was reflected with regard to the N-typeconformational restriction of the monomers and to the secondarystructure of the LNA:RNA duplex.

LNAs also form duplexes with complementary DNA, RNA or LNA with highthermal affinities. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra show that duplexesinvolving fully modified LNA (esp. LNA:RNA) structurally resemble anA-form RNA:RNA duplex. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) examination ofan LNA:DNA duplex confirmed the 3′-endo conformation of an LNA monomer.Recognition of double-stranded DNA has also been demonstrated suggestingstrand invasion by LNA. Studies of mismatched sequences show that LNAsobey the Watson-Crick base pairing rules with generally improvedselectivity compared to the corresponding unmodified reference strands.

Novel types of LNA-oligomeric compounds, as well as the LNAs, are usefulin a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Among theseare antisense applications, PCR applications, strand-displacementoligomers, substrates for nucleic acid polymerases and generally asnucleotide based drugs. Potent and nontoxic antisense oligonucleotidescontaining LNAs have been described (Wahlestedt et al., Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2000, 97, 5633-5638.) The authors have demonstratedthat LNAs confer several desired properties to antisense agents. LNA/DNAcopolymers were not degraded readily in blood serum and cell extracts.LNA/DNA copolymers exhibited potent antisense activity in assay systemsas disparate as G-protein-coupled receptor signaling in living rat brainand detection of reporter genes in Escherichia coli. Lipofectin-mediatedefficient delivery of LNA into living human breast cancer cells has alsobeen accomplished.

The synthesis and preparation of the LNA monomers adenine, cytosine,guanine, 5-methyl-cytosine, thymine and uracil, along with theiroligomerization, and nucleic acid recognition properties have beendescribed (Koshkin et al., Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 3607-3630). LNAs andpreparation thereof are also described in WO 98/39352 and WO 99/14226.

The first analogs of LNA, phosphorothioate-LNA and 2′-thio-LNAs, havealso been prepared (Kumar et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1998, 8,2219-2222). Preparation of locked nucleoside analogs containingoligodeoxyribonucleotide duplexes as substrates for nucleic acidpolymerases has also been described (Wengel et al., PCT InternationalApplication WO 98-DK393 19980914). Furthermore, synthesis of2′-amino-LNA, a novel conformationally restricted high-affinityoligonucleotide analog with a handle has been described in the art(Singh et al., J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 10035-10039). In addition,2′-Amino- and 2′-methylamino-LNA's have been prepared and the thermalstability of their duplexes with complementary RNA and DNA strands hasbeen previously reported.

Further oligonucleotide mimetics have been prepared to include bicyclicand tricyclic nucleoside analogs having the formulas (amidite monomersshown):

(see Steffens et al., Helv. Chim. Acta, 1997, 80, 2426-2439; Steffens etal., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 3249-3255; and Renneberg et al., J.Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 5993-6002). These modified nucleoside analogshave been oligomerized using the phosphoramidite approach and theresulting oligomeric compounds containing tricyclic nucleoside analogshave shown increased thermal stabilities (Tm's) when hybridized to DNA,RNA and itself. Oligomeric compounds containing bicyclic nucleosideanalogs have shown thermal stabilities approaching that of DNA duplexes.

Another class of oligonucleotide mimetic is referred to asphosphonomonoester nucleic acids incorporate a phosphorus group in abackbone the backbone. This class of olignucleotide mimetic is reportedto have useful physical and biological and pharmacological properties inthe areas of inhibiting gene expression (antisense oligonucleotides,ribozymes, sense oligonucleotides and triplex-forming oligonucleotides),as probes for the detection of nucleic acids and as auxiliaries for usein molecular biology.

The general formula (for definitions of Markush variables see: U.S. Pat.Nos. 5,874,553 and 6,127,346 herein incorporated by reference in theirentirety) is shown below.

Another oligonucleotide mimetic has been reported wherein the furanosylring has been replaced by a cyclobutyl moiety.

Modified sugars

Oligomeric compounds of the invention may also contain one or moresubstituted sugar moieties. Preferred oligomeric compounds comprise asugar substituent group selected from: OH; F; O-, S-, or N-alkyl; O-,S-, or N-alkenyl; O-, S- or N-alkynyl; or O-alkyl-O-alkyl, wherein thealkyl, alkenyl and alkynyl may be substituted or unsubstituted C₁ to C₁₀alkyl or C₂ to C₁₀ alkenyl and alkynyl. Particularly preferred areO[(CH₂)_(n)O]_(m)CH₃, O(CH₂)_(n)OCH₃, O(CH₂)—NH₂, O(CH₂)—CH₃,O(CH₂)—ONH₂, and O(CH₂)_(n)ON[(CH₂)_(n)CH₃]₂, where n and m are from 1to about 10. Other preferred oligonucleotides comprise a sugarsubstituent group selected from: C₁ to C₁₀ lower alkyl, substitutedlower alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, alkaryl, aralkyl, O-alkaryl or O-aralkyl,SH, SCH₃, OCN, Cl, Br, CN, CF₃, OCF₃, SOCH₃, SO₂CH₃, ONO₂, NO₂, N₃, NH₂,heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkaryl, aminoalkylamino, polyalkylamino,substituted silyl, an RNA cleaving group, a reporter group, anintercalator, a group for improving the pharmacokinetic properties of anoligonucleotide, or a group for improving the pharmacodynamic propertiesof an oligonucleotide, and other substituents having similar properties.A preferred modification includes 2′-methoxyethoxy (2′-O—CH₂CH₂OCH₃,also known as 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) or 2′-MOE) (Martin et al., Helv.Chim. Acta, 1995, 78, 486-504) i.e., an alkoxyalkoxy group. A furtherpreferred modification includes 2′-dimethylaminooxyethoxy, i.e., aO(CH₂)₂ON(CH₃)₂ group, also known as 2′-DMAOE, as described in exampleshereinbelow, and 2′-dimethylaminoethoxyethoxy (also known in the art as2′-O-dimethyl-amino-ethoxy-ethyl or 2′-DMAEOE), i.e.,2′-O—CH₂—O—CH₂—N(CH₃)₂.

Other preferred sugar substituent groups include methoxy (—O—CH₃),aminopropoxy (—OCH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂), allyl (—CH₂—CH═CH₂), —O-allyl(—O—CH₂—CH═CH₂) and fluoro (F). 2′-Sugar substituent groups may be inthe arabino (up) position or ribo (down) position. A preferred2′-arabino modification is 2′-F. Similar modifications may also be madeat other positions on the oligomeric compound, particularly the 3′position of the sugar on the 3′ terminal nucleoside or in 2′-5′ linkedoligonucleotides and the 5′ position of 5′ terminal nucleotide.Oligomeric compounds may also have sugar mimetics such as cyclobutylmoieties in place of the pentofuranosyl sugar. Representative UnitedStates patents that teach the preparation of such modified sugarstructures include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,981,957;5,118,800; 5,319,080; 5,359,044; 5,393,878; 5,446,137; 5,466,786;5,514,785; 5,519,134; 5,567,811; 5,576,427; 5,591,722; 5,597,909;5,610,300; 5,627,053; 5,639,873; 5,646,265; 5,658,873; 5,670,633;5,792,747; and 5,700,920, certain of which are commonly owned with theinstant application, and each of which is herein incorporated byreference in its entirety.

Further representative sugar substituent groups include groups offormula I_(a) or II_(a):

wherein:

R_(b) is O, S or NH;

R_(d) is a single bond, O, S or C(═O);

R_(e) is C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, N(R_(k))(R_(m)), N(R_(k))(R_(n)),N═C(R_(p))(R_(q)), N═C(R_(p))(R_(r)) or has formula III_(a);

R_(p) and R_(q) are each independently hydrogen or C₁-C₁₀ alkyl;

R_(r) is —R_(x)—R_(y);

each R_(s), R_(t), R_(u) and R_(v) is, independently, hydrogen,C(O)R_(w), substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, substituted orunsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀alkynyl, alkylsulfonyl, arylsulfonyl, a chemical functional group or aconjugate group, wherein the substituent groups are selected fromhydroxyl, amino, alkoxy, carboxy, benzyl, phenyl, nitro, thiol,thioalkoxy, halogen, alkyl, aryl, alkenyl and alkynyl;

or optionally, R_(u) and R_(v), together form a phthalimido moiety withthe nitrogen atom to which they are attached;

each R_(w) is, independently, substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl,trifluoromethyl, cyanoethyloxy, methoxy, ethoxy, t-butoxy, allyloxy,9-fluorenylmethoxy, 2-(trimethylsilyl)-ethoxy, 2,2,2-trichloroethoxy,benzyloxy, butyryl, iso-butyryl, phenyl or aryl;

R_(k) is hydrogen, a nitrogen protecting group or —R_(x)—R_(y);

R_(p) is hydrogen, a nitrogen protecting group or —R_(x)—R_(y);

R_(x) is a bond or a linking moiety;

R_(y) is a chemical functional group, a conjugate group or a solidsupport medium;

each R_(m) and R is, independently, H, a nitrogen protecting group,substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, substituted or unsubstitutedC₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl, wherein thesubstituent groups are selected from hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy, carboxy,benzyl, phenyl, nitro, thiol, thioalkoxy, halogen, alkyl, aryl, alkenyl,alkynyl; NH₃ ⁺, N(R_(u))(R_(v)), guanidino and acyl where said acyl isan acid amide or an ester;

or R_(m) and R_(n), together, are a nitrogen protecting group, arejoined in a ring structure that optionally includes an additionalheteroatom selected from N and O or are a chemical functional group;

R_(i) is OR_(z), SR_(z), or N(R_(z))₂;

each R_(z) is, independently, H, C₁-C₈ alkyl, C₁-C₈ haloalkyl,C(═NH)N(H)R_(u), C(═O)N(H)R_(u) or OC(═O)N(H)R_(u);

R_(f), R_(g) and R_(h) comprise a ring system having from about 4 toabout 7 carbon atoms or having from about 3 to about 6 carbon atoms and1 or 2 heteroatoms wherein said heteroatoms are selected from oxygen,nitrogen and sulfur and wherein said ring system is aliphatic,unsaturated aliphatic, aromatic, or saturated or unsaturatedheterocyclic;

R_(j) is alkyl or haloalkyl having 1 to about 10 carbon atoms, alkenylhaving 2 to about 10 carbon atoms, alkynyl having 2 to about 10 carbonatoms, aryl having 6 to about 14 carbon atoms, N(R_(k))(R_(m))OR_(k),halo, SR_(k) or CN;

m_(a) is 1 to about 10;

each mb is, independently, 0 or 1;

mc is 0 or an integer from 1 to 10;

md is an integer from 1 to 10;

me is from 0, 1 or 2; and

provided that when mc is 0, md is greater than 1.

Representative substituents groups of Formula I are disclosed in U.S.patent application Ser. No. 09/130,973, filed Aug. 7, 1998, entitled“Capped 2′-Oxyethoxy Oligonucleotides,” hereby incorporated by referencein its entirety.

Representative cyclic substituent groups of Formula II are disclosed inU.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/123,108, filed Jul. 27, 1998,entitled “RNA Targeted 2′-Oligomeric compounds that are ConformationallyPreorganized,” hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Particularly preferred sugar substituent groups includeO[(CH₂)_(n)O]_(m)CH₃, O(CH₂)_(n)OCH₃, O(CH₂)_(n)NH₂, O(CH₂)_(n)CH₃,O(CH₂)_(n)ONH₂, and O(CH₂)_(n)ON[(CH₂)_(n)CH₃)]₂, where n and m are from1 to about 10.

Representative guanidino substituent groups that are shown in formulaIII and IV are disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No.09/349,040, entitled “Functionalized Oligomers”, filed Jul. 7, 1999,hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Representative acetamido substituent groups are disclosed in U.S. Pat.No. 6,147,200 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Representative dimethylaminoethyloxyethyl substituent groups aredisclosed in International Patent Application PCT/US99/17895, entitled“2′-O-Dimethylaminoethyloxyethyl-Oligomeric compounds”, filed Aug. 6,1999, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Modified Nucleobases/Naturally Occurring Nucleobases

Oligomeric compounds may also include nucleobase (often referred to inthe art simply as “base” or “heterocyclic base moiety”) modifications orsubstitutions. As used herein, “unmodified” or “natural” nucleobasesinclude the purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G), and the pyrimidinebases thymine (T), cytosine (C) and uracil (U). Modified nucleobasesalso referred herein as heterocyclic base moieties include othersynthetic and natural nucleobases such as 5-methylcytosine (5-me-C),5-hydroxymethyl cytosine, xanthine, hypoxanthine, 2-aminoadenine,6-methyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-propyland other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-thiouracil,2-thiothymine and 2-thiocytosine, 5-halouracil and cytosine, 5-propynyl(—C≡C—CH₃) uracil and cytosine and other alkynyl derivatives ofpyrimidine bases, 6-azo uracil, cytosine and thymine, 5-uracil(pseudouracil), 4-thiouracil, 8-halo, 8-amino, 8-thiol, 8-thioalkyl,8-hydroxyl and other 8-substituted adenines and guanines, 5-haloparticularly 5-bromo, 5-trifluoromethyl and other 5-substituted uracilsand cytosines, 7-methylguanine and 7-methyladenine, 2-F-adenine,2-amino-adenine, 8-azaguanine and 8-azaadenine, 7-deazaguanine and7-deazaadenine and 3-deazaguanine and 3-deazaadenine.

Heterocyclic base moieties may also include those in which the purine orpyrimidine base is replaced with other heterocycles, for example7-deaza-adenine, 7-deazaguanosine, 2-aminopyridine and 2-pyridone.Further nucleobases include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808,those disclosed in The Concise Encyclopedia Of Polymer Science AndEngineering, pages 858-859, Kroschwitz, J. I., ed. John Wiley & Sons,1990, those disclosed by Englisch et al., Angewandte Chemie,International Edition, 1991, 30, 613, and those disclosed by Sanghvi, Y.S., Chapter 15, Antisense Research and Applications, pages 289-302,Crooke, S. T. and Lebleu, B., ed., CRC Press, 1993. Certain of thesenucleobases are particularly useful for increasing the binding affinityof the oligomeric compounds of the invention. These include5-substituted pyrimidines, 6-azapyrimidines and N-2, N-6 and O-6substituted purines, including 2-aminopropyladenine, 5-propynyluraciland 5-propynylcytosine. 5-methylcytosine substitutions have been shownto increase nucleic acid duplex stability by 0.6-1.2° C. (Sanghvi, Y.S., Crooke, S. T. and Lebleu, B., eds., Antisense Research andApplications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993, pp. 276-278) and arepresently preferred base substitutions, even more particularly whencombined with 2′-O-methoxyethyl sugar modifications.

In one aspect of the present invention oligomeric compounds are preparedhaving polycyclic heterocyclic compounds in place of one or moreheterocyclic base moieties. A number of tricyclic heterocyclic compoundshave been previously reported. These compounds are routinely used inantisense applications to increase the binding properties of themodified strand to a target strand. The most studied modifications aretargeted to guanosines hence they have been termed G-clamps or cytidineanalogs. Many of these polycyclic heterocyclic compounds have thegeneral formula:

Representative cytosine analogs that make 3 hydrogen bonds with aguanosine in a second strand include 1,3-diazaphenoxazine-2-one (R₁₀=O,R₁₁-R₁₄=H) [Kurchavov, et al., Nucleosides and Nucleotides, 1997, 16,1837-1846], 1,3-diazaphenothiazine-2-one (R₁₀=S, R₁₁-R₁₄=H), [Lin,K.-Y.; Jones, R. J.; Matteucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,3873-3874] and 6,7,8,9-tetrafluoro-1,3-diazaphenoxazine-2-one (R₁₀=O,R₁₁-R₁₄=F) [Wang, J.; Lin, K.-Y., Matteucci, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,39, 8385-8388]. Incorporated into oligonucleotides these basemodifications were shown to hybridize with complementary guanine and thelatter was also shown to hybridize with adenine and to enhance helicalthermal stability by extended stacking interactions (also see U.S.patent application entitled “Modified Peptide Nucleic Acids” filed May24, 2002, Ser. No. 10/155,920; and U.S. patent application entitled“Nuclease Resistant Chimeric Oligonucleotides” filed May 24, 2002, Ser.No. 10/013,295, both of which are commonly owned with this applicationand are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety).

Further helix-stabilizing properties have been observed when a cytosineanalog/substitute has an aminoethoxy moiety attached to the rigid1,3-diazaphenoxazine-2-one scaffold (R₁₀=O, R₁₁=—O—(CH₂)₂—NH₂, R₁₂₋₁₄=H)[Lin, K.-Y.; Matteucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8531-8532].Binding studies demonstrated that a single incorporation could enhancethe binding affinity of a model oligonucleotide to its complementarytarget DNA or RNA with a ΔT_(m) of up to 18° relative to 5-methylcytosine (dC5^(me)), which is the highest known affinity enhancement fora single modification, yet. On the other hand, the gain in helicalstability does not compromise the specificity of the oligonucleotides.The T_(m) data indicate an even greater discrimination between theperfect match and mismatched sequences compared to dC5^(me). It wassuggested that the tethered amino group serves as an additional hydrogenbond donor to interact with the Hoogsteen face, namely the O6, of acomplementary guanine thereby forming 4 hydrogen bonds. This means thatthe increased affinity of G-clamp is mediated by the combination ofextended base stacking and additional specific hydrogen bonding.

Further tricyclic heterocyclic compounds and methods of using them thatare amenable to the present invention are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.6,028,183, which issued on May 22, 2000, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,007,992,which issued on Dec. 28, 1999, the contents of both are commonlyassigned with this application and are incorporated herein in theirentirety.

The enhanced binding affinity of the phenoxazine derivatives togetherwith their uncompromised sequence specificity makes them valuablenucleobase analogs for the development of more potent antisense-baseddrugs. In fact, promising data have been derived from in vitroexperiments demonstrating that heptanucleotides containing phenoxazinesubstitutions are capable to activate RNaseH, enhance cellular uptakeand exhibit an increased antisense activity [Lin, K-Y; Matteucci, M. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8531-8532]. The activity enhancement was evenmore pronounced in case of G-clamp, as a single substitution was shownto significantly improve the in vitro potency of a 20mer2′-deoxyphosphorothioate oligonucleotides [Flanagan, W. M.; Wolf, J. J.;Olson, P.; Grant, D.; Lin, K.-Y.; Wagner, R. W.; Matteucci, M. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, 96, 3513-3518]. Nevertheless, to optimizeoligonucleotide design and to better understand the impact of theseheterocyclic modifications on the biological activity, it is importantto evaluate their effect on the nuclease stability of the oligomers.

Further modified polycyclic heterocyclic compounds useful asheterocycicic bases are disclosed in but not limited to, the above notedU.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808, as well as U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,845,205; 5,130,302;5,134,066; 5,175,273; 5,367,066; 5,432,272; 5,434,257; 5,457,187;5,459,255; 5,484,908; 5,502,177; 5,525,711; 5,552,540; 5,587,469;5,594,121, 5,596,091; 5,614,617; 5,645,985; 5,646,269; 5,750,692;5,830,653; 5,763,588; 6,005,096; and 5,681,941, and U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 09/996,292 filed Nov. 28, 2001, certain of whichare commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which isherein incorporated by reference.

The oligonucleotides of the present invention also include variants inwhich a different base is present at one or more of the nucleotidepositions in the oligonucleotide. For example, if the first nucleotideis an adenosine, variants may be produced which contain thymidine,guanosine or cytidine at this position. This may be done at any of thepositions of the oligonucleotide. Thus, a 20-mer may comprise 60variations (20 positions×3 alternates at each position) in which theoriginal nucleotide is substituted with any of the three alternatenucleotides. These oligonucleotides are then tested using the methodsdescribed herein to determine their ability to inhibit expression of HCVmRNA and/or HCV replication.

Conjugates

A further preferred substitution that can be appended to the oligomericcompounds of the invention involves the linkage of one or more moietiesor conjugates which enhance the activity, cellular distribution orcellular uptake of the resulting oligomeric compounds. In one embodimentsuch modified oligomeric compounds are prepared by covalently attachingconjugate groups to functional groups such as hydroxyl or amino groups.Conjugate groups of the invention include intercalators, reportermolecules, polyamines, polyamides, polyethylene glycols, polyethers,groups that enhance the pharmacodynamic properties of oligomers, andgroups that enhance the pharmacokinetic properties of oligomers. Typicalconjugates groups include cholesterols, lipids, phospholipids, biotin,phenazine, folate, phenanthridine, anthraquinone, acridine,fluoresceins, rhodamines, coumarins, and dyes. Groups that enhance thepharmacodynamic properties, in the context of this invention, includegroups that improve oligomer uptake, enhance oligomer resistance todegradation, and/or strengthen sequence-specific hybridization with RNA.Groups that enhance the pharmacokinetic properties, in the context ofthis invention, include groups that improve oligomer uptake,distribution, metabolism or excretion. Representative conjugate groupsare disclosed in International Patent Application PCT/US92/09196, filedOct. 23, 1992 the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein byreference. Conjugate moieties include but are not limited to lipidmoieties such as a cholesterol moiety (Letsinger et al., Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA, 1989, 86, 6553-6556), cholic acid (Manoharan et al.,Bioorg. Med. Chem. Let., 1994, 4, 1053-1060), a thioether, e.g.,hexyl-S-tritylthiol (Manoharan et al., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1992, 660,306-309; Manoharan et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Let., 1993, 3, 2765-2770),a thiocholesterol (Oberhauser et al., Nucl. Acids Res., 1992, 20,533-538), an aliphatic chain, e.g., dodecandiol or undecyl residues(Saison-Behmoaras et al., EMBO J., 1991, 10, 1111-1118; Kabanov et al.,FEBS Lett., 1990, 259, 327-330; Svinarchuk et al., Biochimie, 1993, 75,49-54), a phospholipid, e.g., di-hexadecyl-rac-glycerol ortriethylammonium 1,2-di-O-hexadecyl-rac-glycero-3-H-phosphonate(Manoharan et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 3651-3654; Shea et al.,Nucl. Acids Res., 1990, 18, 3777-3783), a polyamine or a polyethyleneglycol chain (Manoharan et al., Nucleosides & Nucleotides, 1995, 14,969-973), or adamantane acetic acid (Manoharan et al., TetrahedronLett., 1995, 36, 3651-3654), a palmityl moiety (Mishra et al., Biochim.Biophys. Acta, 1995, 1264, 229-237), or an octadecylamine orhexylamino-carbonyl-oxycholesterol moiety (Crooke et al., J. Pharmacol.Exp. Ther., 1996, 277, 923-937.

The oligomeric compounds of the invention may also be conjugated toactive drug substances, for example, aspirin, warfarin, phenylbutazone,ibuprofen, suprofen, fenbufen, ketoprofen, (S)-(+)-pranoprofen,carprofen, dansylsarcosine, 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid, flufenamic acid,folinic acid, a benzothiadiazide, chlorothiazide, a diazepine,indomethicin, a barbiturate, a cephalosporin, a sulfa drug, anantidiabetic, an antibacterial or an antibiotic. Oligonucleotide-drugconjugates and their preparation are described in U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 09/334,130 (filed Jun. 15, 1999) which isincorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of sucholigonucleotide conjugates include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat.Nos. 4,828,979; 4,948,882; 5,218,105; 5,525,465; 5,541,313; 5,545,730;5,552,538; 5,578,717, 5,580,731; 5,580,731; 5,591,584; 5,109,124;5,118,802; 5,138,045; 5,414,077; 5,486,603; 5,512,439; 5,578,718;5,608,046; 4,587,044; 4,605,735; 4,667,025; 4,762,779; 4,789,737;4,824,941; 4,835,263; 4,876,335; 4,904,582; 4,958,013; 5,082,830;5,112,963; 5,214,136; 5,082,830; 5,112,963; 5,214,136; 5,245,022;5,254,469; 5,258,506; 5,262,536; 5,272,250; 5,292,873; 5,317,098;5,371,241, 5,391,723; 5,416,203, 5,451,463; 5,510,475; 5,512,667;5,514,785; 5,565,552; 5,567,810; 5,574,142; 5,585,481; 5,587,371;5,595,726; 5,597,696; 5,599,923; 5,599,928 and 5,688,941, certain ofwhich are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of whichis herein incorporated by reference.

Chimeric Oligomeric Compounds

It is not necessary for all positions in an oligomeric compound to beuniformly modified, and in fact more than one of the aforementionedmodifications may be incorporated in a single oligomeric compound oreven at a single monomeric subunit such as a nucleoside within aoligomeric compound. The present invention also includes oligomericcompounds which are chimeric oligomeric compounds. “Chimeric” oligomericcompounds or “chimeras,” in the context of this invention, areoligomeric compounds that contain two or more chemically distinctregions, each made up of at least one monomer unit, i.e., a nucleotidein the case of a nucleic acid based oligomer.

Chimeric oligomeric compounds typically contain at least one regionmodified so as to confer increased resistance to nuclease degradation,increased cellular uptake, and/or increased binding affinity for thetarget nucleic acid. An additional region of the oligomeric compound mayserve as a substrate for enzymes capable of cleaving RNA:DNA or RNA:RNAhybrids. By way of example, RNase H is a cellular endonuclease whichcleaves the RNA strand of an RNA:DNA duplex. Activation of RNase H,therefore, results in cleavage of the RNA target, thereby greatlyenhancing the efficiency of inhibition of gene expression. Consequently,comparable results can often be obtained with shorter oligomericcompounds when chimeras are used, compared to for examplephosphorothioate deoxyoligonucleotides hybridizing to the same targetregion. Cleavage of the RNA target can be routinely detected by gelelectrophoresis and, if necessary, associated nucleic acid hybridizationtechniques known in the art.

Chimeric oligomeric compounds of the invention may be formed ascomposite structures of two or more oligonucleotides, oligonucleotideanalogs, oligonucleosides and/or oligonucleotide mimetics as describedabove. Such oligomeric compounds have also been referred to in the artas hybrids hemimers, gapmers or inverted gapmers. Representative UnitedStates patents that teach the preparation of such hybrid structuresinclude, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,013,830; 5,149,797;5,220,007; 5,256,775; 5,366,878; 5,403,711; 5,491,133; 5,565,350;5,623,065; 5,652,355; 5,652,356; and 5,700,922, certain of which arecommonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is hereinincorporated by reference in its entirety.

3′-Endo Modifications

In one aspect of the present invention oligomeric compounds includenucleosides synthetically modified to induce a 3′-endo sugarconformation. A nucleoside can incorporate synthetic modifications ofthe heterocyclic base, the sugar moiety or both to induce a desired3′-endo sugar conformation. These modified nucleosides are used to mimicRNA like nucleosides so that particular properties of an oligomericcompound can be enhanced while maintaining the desirable 3′-endoconformational geometry. There is an apparent preference for an RNA typeduplex (A form helix, predominantly 3′-endo) as a requirement (e.g.trigger) of RNA interference which is supported in part by the fact thatduplexes composed of 2′-deoxy-2′-F-nucleosides appears efficient intriggering RNAi response in the C. elegans system. Properties that areenhanced by using more stable 3′-endo nucleosides include but aren'tlimited to modulation of pharmacokinetic properties through modificationof protein binding, protein off-rate, absorption and clearance;modulation of nuclease stability as well as chemical stability;modulation of the binding affinity and specificity of the oligomer(affinity and specificity for enzymes as well as for complementarysequences); and increasing efficacy of RNA cleavage. The presentinvention provides oligomeric triggers of RNAi having one or morenucleosides modified in such a way as to favor a C3′-endo typeconformation.

Nucleoside conformation is influenced by various factors includingsubstitution at the 2′, 3′ or 4′-positions of the pentofuranosyl sugar.Electronegative substituents generally prefer the axial positions, whilesterically demanding substituents generally prefer the equatorialpositions (Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, Wolfgang Sanger, 1984,Springer-Verlag.) Modification of the 2′ position to favor the 3′-endoconformation can be achieved while maintaining the 2′-OH as arecognition element, as illustrated in FIG. 2, below (Gallo et al.,Tetrahedron (2001), 57, 5707-5713. Harry-O'kuru et al., J. Org. Chem.,(1997), 62(6), 1754-1759 and Tang et al., J. Org. Chem. (1999), 64,747-754.) Alternatively, preference for the 3′-endo conformation can beachieved by deletion of the 2′-OH as exemplified by2′deoxy-2′F-nucleosides (Kawasaki et al., J. Med. Chem. (1993), 36,831-841), which adopts the 3′-endo conformation positioning theelectronegative fluorine atom in the axial position. Other modificationsof the ribose ring, for example substitution at the 4′-position to give4′-F modified nucleosides (Guillerm et al., Bioorganic and MedicinalChemistry Letters (1995), 5, 1455-1460 and Owen et al., J. Org. Chem.(1976), 41, 3010-3017), or for example modification to yieldmethanocarba nucleoside analogs (Jacobson et al., J. Med. Chem. Lett.(2000), 43, 2196-2203 and Lee et al., Bioorganic and Medicinal ChemistryLetters (2001), 11, 1333-1337) also induce preference for the 3′-endoconformation. Along similar lines, oligomeric triggers of RNAi responsemight be composed of one or more nucleosides modified in such a way thatconformation is locked into a C3′-endo type conformation, i.e. LockedNucleic Acid (LNA, Singh et al, Chem. Commun. (1998), 4, 455-456), andethylene bridged Nucleic Acids (ENA, Morita et al, Bioorganic &Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2002), 12, 73-76.) Examples of modifiednucleosides amenable to the present invention are shown below in TableI. These examples are meant to be representative and not exhaustive.

TABLE I

The preferred conformation of modified nucleosides and their oligomerscan be estimated by various methods such as molecular dynamicscalculations, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and CDmeasurements. Hence, modifications predicted to induce RNA likeconformations, A-form duplex geometry in an oligomeric context, areselected for use in the modified oligonucleotides of the presentinvention. The synthesis of numerous of the modified nucleosidesamenable to the present invention are known in the art (see for example,Chemistry of Nucleosides and Nucleotides Vol 1-3, ed. Leroy B. Townsend,1988, Plenum press., and the examples section below.) Nucleosides knownto be inhibitors/substrates for RNA dependent RNA polymerases (forexample HCV NS5B

In one aspect, the present invention is directed to oligonucleotidesthat are prepared having enhanced properties compared to native RNAagainst nucleic acid targets. A target is identified and anoligonucleotide is selected having an effective length and sequence thatis complementary to a portion of the target sequence. Each nucleoside ofthe selected sequence is scrutinized for possible enhancingmodifications. A preferred modification would be the replacement of oneor more RNA nucleosides with nucleosides that have the same 3′-endoconformational geometry. Such modifications can enhance chemical andnuclease stability relative to native RNA while at the same time beingmuch cheaper and easier to synthesize and/or incorporate into anoligonucleotide. The selected sequence can be further divided intoregions and the nucleosides of each region evaluated for enhancingmodifications that can be the result of a chimeric configuration.Consideration is also given to the 5′ and 3′-termini as there are oftenadvantageous modifications that can be made to one or more of theterminal nucleosides. The oligomeric compounds of the present inventioninclude at least one 5′-modified phosphate group on a single strand oron at least one 5′-position of a double stranded sequence or sequences.Further modifications are also considered such as internucleosidelinkages, conjugate groups, substitute sugars or bases, substitution ofone or more nucleosides with nucleoside mimetics and any othermodification that can enhance the selected sequence for its intendedtarget. The terms used to describe the conformational geometry ofhomoduplex nucleic acids are “A Form” for RNA and “B Form” for DNA. Therespective conformational geometry for RNA and DNA duplexes wasdetermined from X-ray diffraction analysis of nucleic acid fibers(Arnott and Hukins, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 1970, 47, 1504.) Ingeneral, RNA:RNA duplexes are more stable and have higher meltingtemperatures (Tm's) than DNA:DNA duplexes (Sanger et al., Principles ofNucleic Acid Structure, 1984, Springer-Verlag; New York, N.Y.; Lesnik etal., Biochemistry, 1995, 34, 10807-10815; Conte et al., Nucleic AcidsRes., 1997, 25, 2627-2634). The increased stability of RNA has beenattributed to several structural features, most notably the improvedbase stacking interactions that result from an A-form geometry (Searleet al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1993, 21, 2051-2056). The presence of the 2′hydroxyl in RNA biases the sugar toward a C3′ endo pucker, i.e., alsodesignated as Northern pucker, which causes the duplex to favor theA-form geometry. In addition, the 2′ hydroxyl groups of RNA can form anetwork of water mediated hydrogen bonds that help stabilize the RNAduplex (Egli et al., Biochemistry, 1996, 35, 8489-8494). On the otherhand, deoxy nucleic acids prefer a C2′ endo sugar pucker, i.e., alsoknown as Southern pucker, which is thought to impart a less stableB-form geometry (Sanger, W. (1984) Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure,Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.). As used herein, B-form geometry isinclusive of both C2′-endo pucker and O4′-endo pucker. This isconsistent with Berger, et. al., Nucleic Acids Research, 1998, 26,2473-2480, who pointed out that in considering the furanoseconformations which give rise to B-form duplexes consideration shouldalso be given to a O4′-endo pucker contribution.

DNA:RNA hybrid duplexes, however, are usually less stable than pureRNA:RNA duplexes, and depending on their sequence may be either more orless stable than DNA:DNA duplexes (Searle et al., Nucleic Acids Res.,1993, 21, 2051-2056). The structure of a hybrid duplex is intermediatebetween A- and B-form geometries, which may result in poor stackinginteractions (Lane et al., Eur. J. Biochem., 1993, 215, 297-306;Fedoroff et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1993, 233, 509-523; Gonzalez et al.,Biochemistry, 1995, 34, 4969-4982; Horton et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1996,264, 521-533). The stability of the duplex formed between a target RNAand a synthetic sequence is central to therapies such as but not limitedto antisense and RNA interference as these mechanisms require thebinding of a synthetic oligonucleotide strand to an RNA target strand.In the case of antisense, effective inhibition of the mRNA requires thatthe antisense DNA have a very high binding affinity with the mRNA.Otherwise the desired interaction between the synthetic oligonucleotidestrand and target mRNA strand will occur infrequently, resulting indecreased efficacy.

One routinely used method of modifying the sugar puckering is thesubstitution of the sugar at the 2′-position with a substituent groupthat influences the sugar geometry. The influence on ring conformationis dependant on the nature of the substituent at the 2′-position. Anumber of different substituents have been studied to determine theirsugar puckering effect. For example, 2′-halogens have been studiedshowing that the 2′-fluoro derivative exhibits the largest population(65%) of the C3′-endo form, and the 2′-iodo exhibits the lowestpopulation (7%). The populations of adenosine (2′-OH) versusdeoxyadenosine (2′-H) are 36% and 19%, respectively. Furthermore, theeffect of the 2′-fluoro group of adenosine dimers(2′-deoxy-2′-fluoroadenosine-2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-adenosine) is furthercorrelated to the stabilization of the stacked conformation.

As expected, the relative duplex stability can be enhanced byreplacement of 2′-OH groups with 2′-F groups thereby increasing theC3′-endo population. It is assumed that the highly polar nature of the2′-F bond and the extreme preference for C3′-endo puckering maystabilize the stacked conformation in an A-form duplex. Data from UVhypochromicity, circular dichroism, and ¹H NMR also indicate that thedegree of stacking decreases as the electronegativity of the halosubstituent decreases. Furthermore, steric bulk at the 2′-position ofthe sugar moiety is better accommodated in an A-form duplex than aB-form duplex. Thus, a 2′-substituent on the 3′-terminus of adinucleoside monophosphate is thought to exert a number of effects onthe stacking conformation: steric repulsion, furanose puckeringpreference, electrostatic repulsion, hydrophobic attraction, andhydrogen bonding capabilities. These substituent effects are thought tobe determined by the molecular size, electronegativity, andhydrophobicity of the substituent. Melting temperatures of complementarystrands is also increased with the 2′-substituted adenosinediphosphates. It is not clear whether the 3′-endo preference of theconformation or the presence of the substituent is responsible for theincreased binding. However, greater overlap of adjacent bases (stacking)can be achieved with the 3′-endo conformation.

One synthetic 2′-modification that imparts increased nuclease resistanceand a very high binding affinity to nucleotides is the 2-methoxyethoxy(2′-MOE, 2′-OCH₂CH₂OCH₃) side chain (Baker et al., J. Biol. Chem., 1997,272, 11944-12000). One of the immediate advantages of the 2′-MOEsubstitution is the improvement in binding affinity, which is greaterthan many similar 2′ modifications such as O-methyl, O-propyl, andO-aminopropyl. Oligonucleotides having the 2′-O-methoxyethyl substituentalso have been shown to be antisense inhibitors of gene expression withpromising features for in vivo use (Martin, P., Helv. Chim. Acta, 1995,78, 486-504; Altmann et al., Chimia, 1996, 50, 168-176; Altmann et al.,Biochem. Soc. Trans., 1996, 24, 630-637; and Altmann et al., NucleosidesNucleotides, 1997, 16, 917-926). Relative to DNA, the oligonucleotideshaving the 2′-MOE modification displayed improved RNA affinity andhigher nuclease resistance. Chimeric oligonucleotides having 2′-MOEsubstituents in the wing nucleosides and an internal region ofdeoxy-phosphorothioate nucleotides (also termed a gapped oligonucleotideor gapmer) have shown effective reduction in the growth of tumors inanimal models at low doses. 2′-MOE substituted oligonucleotides havealso shown outstanding promise as antisense agents in several diseasestates. One such MOE substituted oligonucleotide is presently beinginvestigated in clinical trials for the treatment of CMV retinitis.

Chemistries Defined

Unless otherwise defined herein, alkyl means C₁-C₁₂, preferably C₁-C₈,and more preferably C₁-C₆, straight or (where possible) branched chainaliphatic hydrocarbyl.

Unless otherwise defined herein, heteroalkyl means C₁-C₁₂, preferablyC₁-C₈, and more preferably C₁-C₆, straight or (where possible) branchedchain aliphatic hydrocarbyl containing at least one, and preferablyabout 1 to about 3, hetero atoms in the chain, including the terminalportion of the chain. Preferred heteroatoms include N, O and S. Unlessotherwise defined herein, cycloalkyl means C₃-C₁₂, preferably C₃-C₈, andmore preferably C₃-C₆, aliphatic hydrocarbyl ring.

Unless otherwise defined herein, alkenyl means C₂-C₁₂, preferably C₂-C₈,and more preferably C₂-C₆ alkenyl, which may be straight or (wherepossible) branched hydrocarbyl moiety, which contains at least onecarbon-carbon double bond.

Unless otherwise defined herein, alkynyl means C₂-C₁₂, preferably C₂-C₈,and more preferably C₂-C₆ alkynyl, which may be straight or (wherepossible) branched hydrocarbyl moiety, which contains at least onecarbon-carbon triple bond.

Unless otherwise defined herein, heterocycloalkyl means a ring moietycontaining at least three ring members, at least one of which is carbon,and of which 1, 2 or three ring members are other than carbon.Preferably the number of carbon atoms varies from 1 to about 12,preferably 1 to about 6, and the total number of ring members variesfrom three to about 15, preferably from about 3 to about 8. Preferredring heteroatoms are N, O and S. Preferred heterocycloalkyl groupsinclude morpholino, thiomorpholino, piperidinyl, piperazinyl,homopiperidinyl, homopiperazinyl, homomorpholino, homothiomorpholino,pyrrolodinyl, tetrahydrooxazolyl, tetrahydroimidazolyl,tetrahydrothiazolyl, tetrahydroisoxazolyl, tetrahydropyrrazolyl,furanyl, pyranyl, and tetrahydroisothiazolyl.

Unless otherwise defined herein, aryl means any hydrocarbon ringstructure containing at least one aryl ring. Preferred aryl rings haveabout 6 to about 20 ring carbons. Especially preferred aryl ringsinclude phenyl, napthyl, anthracenyl, and phenanthrenyl.

Unless otherwise defined herein, hetaryl means a ring moiety containingat least one fully unsaturated ring, the ring consisting of carbon andnon-carbon atoms. Preferably the ring system contains about 1 to about 4rings. Preferably the number of carbon atoms varies from 1 to about 12,preferably 1 to about 6, and the total number of ring members variesfrom three to about 15, preferably from about 3 to about 8. Preferredring heteroatoms are N, O and S. Preferred hetaryl moieties includepyrazolyl, thiophenyl, pyridyl, imidazolyl, tetrazolyl, pyridyl,pyrimidinyl, purinyl, quinazolinyl, quinoxalinyl, benzimidazolyl,benzothiophenyl, etc.

Unless otherwise defined herein, where a moiety is defined as a compoundmoiety, such as hetarylalkyl (hetaryl and alkyl), aralkyl (aryl andalkyl), etc., each of the sub-moieties is as defined herein.

Unless otherwise defined herein, an electron withdrawing group is agroup, such as the cyano or isocyanato group that draws electroniccharge away from the carbon to which it is attached. Other electronwithdrawing groups of note include those whose electronegativitiesexceed that of carbon, for example halogen, nitro, or phenyl substitutedin the ortho- or para-position with one or more cyano, isothiocyanato,nitro or halo groups.

Unless otherwise defined herein, the terms halogen and halo have theirordinary meanings. Preferred halo (halogen) substituents are Cl, Br, andI.

The aforementioned optional substituents are, unless otherwise hereindefined, suitable substituents depending upon desired properties.Included are halogens (Cl, Br, I), alkyl, alkenyl, and alkynyl moieties,NO₂, NH₃ (substituted and unsubstituted), acid moieties (e.g. —CO₂H,—OSO₃H₂, etc.), heterocycloalkyl moieties, hetaryl moieties, arylmoieties, etc.

In all the preceding formulae, the squiggle (˜) indicates a bond to anoxygen or sulfur of the 5′-phosphate.

Phosphate protecting groups include those described in U.S. Pat. No.5,760,209, U.S. Pat. No. 5,614,621, U.S. Pat. No. 6,051,699, U.S. Pat.No. 6,020,475, U.S. Pat. No. 6,326,478, U.S. Pat. No. 6,169,177, U.S.Pat. No. 6,121,437, U.S. Pat. No. 6,465,628 each of which is expresslyincorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

The oligonucleotides in accordance with this invention (single strandedor double stranded) preferably comprise from about 8 to about 80nucleotides, more preferably from about 12-50 nucleotides and mostpreferably from about 15 to 30 nucleotides. As is known in the art, anucleotide is a base-sugar combination suitably bound to an adjacentnucleotide through a phosphodiester, phosphorothioate or other covalentlinkage.

The oligonucleotides of the present invention also include variants inwhich a different base is present at one or more of the nucleotidepositions in the oligonucleotide. For example, if the first nucleotideis an adenosine, variants may be produced which contain thymidine,guanosine or cytidine at this position. This may be done at any of thepositions of the oligonucleotide. Thus, a 20-mer may comprise 60variations (20 positions×3 alternates at each position) in which theoriginal nucleotide is substituted with any of the three alternatenucleotides. These oligonucleotides are then tested using the methodsdescribed herein to determine their ability to inhibit expression ofsuperoxide dismutase-1, soluble mRNA.

The antisense compounds used in accordance with this invention may beconveniently and routinely made through the well-known technique ofsolid phase synthesis. Equipment for such synthesis is sold by severalvendors including, for example, Applied Biosystems (Foster City,Calif.). Any other means for such synthesis known in the art mayadditionally or alternatively be employed. It is well known to usesimilar techniques to prepare oligonucleotides such as thephosphorothioates and alkylated derivatives.

The antisense compounds of the invention are synthesized in vitro and donot include antisense compositions of biological origin, or geneticvector constructs designed to direct the in vivo synthesis of antisensemolecules.

The compounds of the invention may also be admixed, encapsulated,conjugated or otherwise associated with other molecules, moleculestructures or mixtures of compounds, as for example, liposomes, receptortargeted molecules, oral, rectal, topical or other formulations, forassisting in uptake, distribution and/or absorption. RepresentativeUnited States patents that teach the preparation of such uptake,distribution and/or absorption assisting formulations include, but arenot limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,108,921; 5,354,844; 5,416,016;5,459,127; 5,521,291; 5,543,158; 5,547,932; 5,583,020; 5,591,721;4,426,330; 4,534,899; 5,013,556; 5,108,921; 5,213,804; 5,227,170;5,264,221; 5,356,633; 5,395,619; 5,416,016; 5,417,978; 5,462,854;5,469,854; 5,512,295; 5,527,528; 5,534,259; 5,543,152; 5,556,948;5,580,575; and 5,595,756, each of which is herein incorporated byreference.

The antisense compounds of the invention encompass any pharmaceuticallyacceptable salts, esters, or salts of such esters, or any other compoundwhich, upon administration to an animal including a human, is capable ofproviding (directly or indirectly) the biologically active metabolite orresidue thereof. Accordingly, for example, the disclosure is also drawnto prodrugs and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compounds ofthe invention, pharmaceutically acceptable salts of such prodrugs, andother bioequivalents.

The term “prodrug” indicates a therapeutic agent that is prepared in aninactive form that is converted to an active form (i.e., drug) withinthe body or cells thereof by the action of endogenous enzymes or otherchemicals and/or conditions. In particular, prodrug versions of theoligonucleotides of the invention are prepared as SATE[(S-acetyl-2-thioethyl)phosphate]derivatives according to the methodsdisclosed in WO 93/24510 to Gosselin et al., published Dec. 9, 1993 orin WO 94/26764 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,770,713 to Imbach et al.

The term “pharmaceutically acceptable salts” refers to physiologicallyand pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compounds of the invention:i.e., salts that retain the desired biological activity of the parentcompound and do not impart undesired toxicological effects thereto.

Pharmaceutically acceptable base addition salts are formed with metalsor amines, such as alkali and alkaline earth metals or organic aminesExamples of metals used as cations are sodium, potassium, magnesium,calcium, and the like. Examples of suitable amines areN,N′-dibenzylethylenediamine, chloroprocaine, choline, diethanolamine,dicyclohexylamine, ethylenediamine, N-methylglucamine, and procaine(see, for example, Berge et al., “Pharmaceutical Salts,” J. of PharmaSci., 1977, 66, 1-19). The base addition salts of said acidic compoundsare prepared by contacting the free acid form with a sufficient amountof the desired base to produce the salt in the conventional manner. Thefree acid form may be regenerated by contacting the salt form with anacid and isolating the free acid in the conventional manner. The freeacid forms differ from their respective salt forms somewhat in certainphysical properties such as solubility in polar solvents, but otherwisethe salts are equivalent to their respective free acid for purposes ofthe present invention. As used herein, a “pharmaceutical addition salt”includes a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an acid form of one ofthe components of the compositions of the invention. These includeorganic or inorganic acid salts of the amines Preferred acid salts arethe hydrochlorides, acetates, salicylates, nitrates and phosphates.Other suitable pharmaceutically acceptable salts are well known to thoseskilled in the art and include basic salts of a variety of inorganic andorganic acids, such as, for example, with inorganic acids, such as forexample hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid, sulfuric acid or phosphoricacid; with organic carboxylic, sulfonic, sulfo or phospho acids orN-substituted sulfamic acids, for example acetic acid, propionic acid,glycolic acid, succinic acid, maleic acid, hydroxymaleic acid,methylmaleic acid, fumaric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid,oxalic acid, gluconic acid, glucaric acid, glucuronic acid, citric acid,benzoic acid, cinnamic acid, mandelic acid, salicylic acid,4-aminosalicylic acid, 2-phenoxybenzoic acid, 2-acetoxybenzoic acid,embonic acid, nicotinic acid or isonicotinic acid; and with amino acids,such as the 20 alpha-amino acids involved in the synthesis of proteinsin nature, for example glutamic acid or aspartic acid, and also withphenylacetic acid, methanesulfonic acid, ethanesulfonic acid,2-hydroxyethanesulfonic acid, ethane-1,2-disulfonic acid,benzenesulfonic acid, 4-methylbenzenesulfonic acid,naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid, naphthalene-1,5-disulfonic acid, 2- or3-phosphoglycerate, glucose-6-phosphate, N-cyclohexylsulfamic acid (withthe formation of cyclamates), or with other acid organic compounds, suchas ascorbic acid. Pharmaceutically acceptable salts of compounds mayalso be prepared with a pharmaceutically acceptable cation. Suitablepharmaceutically acceptable cations are well known to those skilled inthe art and include alkaline, alkaline earth, ammonium and quaternaryammonium cations. Carbonates or hydrogen carbonates are also possible.

For oligonucleotides, preferred examples of pharmaceutically acceptablesalts include but are not limited to (a) salts formed with cations suchas sodium, potassium, ammonium, magnesium, calcium, polyamines such asspermine and spermidine, etc.; (b) acid addition salts formed withinorganic acids, for example hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid,sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, nitric acid and the like; (c) saltsformed with organic acids such as, for example, acetic acid, oxalicacid, tartaric acid, succinic acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, gluconicacid, citric acid, malic acid, ascorbic acid, benzoic acid, tannic acid,palmitic acid, alginic acid, polyglutamic acid, naphthalenesulfonicacid, methanesulfonic acid, p-toluenesulfonic acid,naphthalenedisulfonic acid, polygalacturonic acid, and the like; and (d)salts formed from elemental anions such as chlorine, bromine, andiodine.

The antisense compounds of the present invention can be utilized fordiagnostics, therapeutics, prophylaxis and as research reagents andkits. For therapeutics, an animal, preferably a human, suspected ofhaving a disease or disorder which can be treated by modulating theexpression of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble is treated byadministering antisense compounds in accordance with this invention. Thecompounds of the invention can be utilized in pharmaceuticalcompositions by adding an effective amount of an antisense compound to asuitable pharmaceutically acceptable diluent or carrier. Use of theantisense compounds and methods of the invention may also be usefulprophylactically, e.g., to prevent or delay infection, inflammation ortumor formation, for example.

The antisense compounds of the invention are useful for research anddiagnostics, because these compounds hybridize to nucleic acids encodingsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble, enabling sandwich and other assays toeasily be constructed to exploit this fact. Hybridization of theantisense oligonucleotides of the invention with a nucleic acid encodingsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble can be detected by means known in theart. Such means may include conjugation of an enzyme to theoligonucleotide, radiolabelling of the oligonucleotide or any othersuitable detection means. Kits using such detection means for detectingthe level of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble in a sample may also beprepared.

The present invention also includes pharmaceutical compositions andformulations which include the antisense compounds of the invention. Thepharmaceutical compositions of the present invention may be administeredin a number of ways depending upon whether local or systemic treatmentis desired and upon the area to be treated. Administration may betopical (including ophthalmic and to mucous membranes including vaginaland rectal delivery), pulmonary, e.g., by inhalation or insufflation ofpowders or aerosols, including by nebulizer; intratracheal, intranasal,epidermal and transdermal), oral or parenteral. Parenteraladministration includes intravenous, intraarterial, subcutaneous,intraperitoneal or intramuscular injection or infusion; or intracranial,e.g., intrathecal or intraventricular, administration. Oligonucleotideswith at least one 2′-O-methoxyethyl modification are believed to beparticularly useful for oral administration.

Pharmaceutical compositions and formulations for topical administrationmay include transdermal patches, ointments, lotions, creams, gels,drops, suppositories, sprays, liquids and powders. Conventionalpharmaceutical carriers, aqueous, powder or oily bases, thickeners andthe like may be necessary or desirable. Coated condoms, gloves and thelike may also be useful. Preferred topical formulations include those inwhich the oligonucleotides of the invention are in admixture with atopical delivery agent such as lipids, liposomes, fatty acids, fattyacid esters, steroids, chelating agents and surfactants. Preferredlipids and liposomes include neutral (e.g. dioleoylphosphatidyl DOPEethanolamine, dimyristoylphosphatidyl choline DMPC,distearolyphosphatidyl choline) negative (e.g. dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol DMPG) and cationic (e.g. dioleoyltetramethylaminopropyl DOTAPand dioleoylphosphatidyl ethanolamine DOTMA). Oligonucleotides of theinvention may be encapsulated within liposomes or may form complexesthereto, in particular to cationic liposomes. Alternatively,oligonucleotides may be complexed to lipids, in particular to cationiclipids. Preferred fatty acids and esters include but are not limitedarachidonic acid, oleic acid, eicosanoic acid, lauric acid, caprylicacid, capric acid, myristic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, linoleicacid, linolenic acid, dicaprate, tricaprate, monoolein, dilaurin,glyceryl 1-monocaprate, 1-dodecylazacycloheptan-2-one, an acylcarnitine,an acylcholine, or a C₁₋₁₀ alkyl ester (e.g. isopropylmyristate IPM),monoglyceride, diglyceride or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.Topical formulations are described in detail in U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 09/315,298 filed on May 20, 1999 which is incorporated hereinby reference in its entirety.

Compositions and formulations for oral administration include powders orgranules, microparticulates, nanoparticulates, suspensions or solutionsin water or non-aqueous media, capsules, gel capsules, sachets, tabletsor minitablets. Thickeners, flavoring agents, diluents, emulsifiers,dispersing aids or binders may be desirable. Preferred oral formulationsare those in which oligonucleotides of the invention are administered inconjunction with one or more penetration enhancers surfactants andchelators. Preferred surfactants include fatty acids and/or esters orsalts thereof, bile acids and/or salts thereof. Preferred bileacids/salts include chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) andursodeoxychenodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), cholic acid, dehydrocholic acid,deoxycholic acid, glucholic acid, glycholic acid, glycodeoxycholic acid,taurocholic acid, taurodeoxycholic acid, sodiumtauro-24,25-dihydro-fusidate, sodium glycodihydrofusidate. Preferredfatty acids include arachidonic acid, undecanoic acid, oleic acid,lauric acid, caprylic acid, capric acid, myristic acid, palmitic acid,stearic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, dicaprate, tricaprate,monoolein, dilaurin, glyceryl 1-monocaprate,1-dodecylazacycloheptan-2-one, an acylcarnitine, an acylcholine, or amonoglyceride, a diglyceride or a pharmaceutically acceptable saltthereof (e.g. sodium). Also preferred are combinations of penetrationenhancers, for example, fatty acids/salts in combination with bileacids/salts. A particularly preferred combination is the sodium salt oflauric acid, capric acid and UDCA. Further penetration enhancers includepolyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene-20-cetyl ether.Oligonucleotides of the invention may be delivered orally in granularform including sprayed dried particles, or complexed to form micro ornanoparticles. Oligonucleotide complexing agents include poly-aminoacids; polyimines; polyacrylates; polyalkylacrylates, polyoxethanes,polyalkylcyanoacrylates; cationized gelatins, albumins, starches,acrylates, polyethyleneglycols (PEG) and starches;polyalkylcyanoacrylates; DEAE-derivatized polyimines, pollulans,celluloses and starches. Particularly preferred complexing agentsinclude chitosan, N-trimethylchitosan, poly-L-lysine, polyhistidine,polyornithine, polyspermines, protamine, polyvinylpyridine,polythiodiethylamino-methylethylene P(TDAE), polyaminostyrene (e.g.p-amino), poly(methylcyanoacrylate), poly(ethylcyanoacrylate),poly(butylcyanoacrylate), poly(isobutylcyanoacrylate),poly(isohexylcynaoacrylate), DEAE-methacrylate, DEAE-hexylacrylate,DEAE-acrylamide, DEAE-albumin and DEAE-dextran, polymethylacrylate,polyhexylacrylate, poly(D,L-lactic acid), poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolicacid (PLGA), alginate, and polyethyleneglycol (PEG). Oral formulationsfor oligonucleotides and their preparation are described in detail inU.S. application Ser. No. 08/886,829 (filed Jul. 1, 1997), Ser. No.09/108,673 (filed Jul. 1, 1998), Ser. No. 09/256,515 (filed Feb. 23,1999), Ser. No. 09/082,624 (filed May 21, 1998) and Ser. No. 09/315,298(filed May 20, 1999) each of which is incorporated herein by referencein their entirety.

Compositions and formulations for parenteral, intrathecal orintraventricular administration may include sterile aqueous solutionswhich may also contain buffers, diluents and other suitable additivessuch as, but not limited to, penetration enhancers, carrier compoundsand other pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or excipients.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention include, but arenot limited to, solutions, emulsions, and liposome-containingformulations. These compositions may be generated from a variety ofcomponents that include, but are not limited to, preformed liquids,self-emulsifying solids and self-emulsifying semisolids.

The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention, which mayconveniently be presented in unit dosage form, may be prepared accordingto conventional techniques well known in the pharmaceutical industry.Such techniques include the step of bringing into association the activeingredients with the pharmaceutical carrier(s) or excipient(s). Ingeneral the formulations are prepared by uniformly and intimatelybringing into association the active ingredients with liquid carriers orfinely divided solid carriers or both, and then, if necessary, shapingthe product.

The compositions of the present invention may be formulated into any ofmany possible dosage forms such as, but not limited to, tablets,capsules, gel capsules, liquid syrups, soft gels, suppositories, andenemas. The compositions of the present invention may also be formulatedas suspensions in aqueous, non-aqueous or mixed media. Aqueoussuspensions may further contain substances which increase the viscosityof the suspension including, for example, sodium carboxymethylcellulose,sorbitol and/or dextran. The suspension may also contain stabilizers.

In one embodiment of the present invention the pharmaceuticalcompositions may be formulated and used as foams. Pharmaceutical foamsinclude formulations such as, but not limited to, emulsions,microemulsions, creams, jellies and liposomes. While basically similarin nature these formulations vary in the components and the consistencyof the final product. The preparation of such compositions andformulations is generally known to those skilled in the pharmaceuticaland formulation arts and may be applied to the formulation of thecompositions of the present invention.

Emulsions

The compositions of the present invention may be prepared and formulatedas emulsions. Emulsions are typically heterogenous systems of one liquiddispersed in another in the form of droplets usually exceeding 0.1 μm indiameter. (Idson, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman, Rieger andBanker (Eds.), 1988, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., volume 1, p.199; Rosoff, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman, Rieger andBanker (Eds.), 1988, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., Volume 1, p.245; Block in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman, Rieger and Banker(Eds.), 1988, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., volume 2, p. 335;Higuchi et al., in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mack PublishingCo., Easton, Pa., 1985, p. 301). Emulsions are often biphasic systemscomprising of two immiscible liquid phases intimately mixed anddispersed with each other. In general, emulsions may be eitherwater-in-oil (w/o) or of the oil-in-water (o/w) variety. When an aqueousphase is finely divided into and dispersed as minute droplets into abulk oily phase the resulting composition is called a water-in-oil (w/o)emulsion. Alternatively, when an oily phase is finely divided into anddispersed as minute droplets into a bulk aqueous phase the resultingcomposition is called an oil-in-water (o/w) emulsion. Emulsions maycontain additional components in addition to the dispersed phases andthe active drug which may be present as a solution in either the aqueousphase, oily phase or itself as a separate phase. Pharmaceuticalexcipients such as emulsifiers, stabilizers, dyes, and anti-oxidants mayalso be present in emulsions as needed. Pharmaceutical emulsions mayalso be multiple emulsions that are comprised of more than two phasessuch as, for example, in the case of oil-in-water-in-oil (o/w/o) andwater-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) emulsions. Such complex formulations oftenprovide certain advantages that simple binary emulsions do not. Multipleemulsions in which individual oil droplets of an o/w emulsion enclosesmall water droplets constitute a w/o/w emulsion. Likewise a system ofoil droplets enclosed in globules of water stabilized in an oilycontinuous provides an o/w/o emulsion.

Emulsions are characterized by little or no thermodynamic stability.Often, the dispersed or discontinuous phase of the emulsion is welldispersed into the external or continuous phase and maintained in thisform through the means of emulsifiers or the viscosity of theformulation. Either of the phases of the emulsion may be a semisolid ora solid, as is the case of emulsion-style ointment bases and creams.Other means of stabilizing emulsions entail the use of emulsifiers thatmay be incorporated into either phase of the emulsion. Emulsifiers maybroadly be classified into four categories: synthetic surfactants,naturally occurring emulsifiers, absorption bases, and finely dispersedsolids (Idson, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman, Rieger andBanker (Eds.), 1988, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., volume 1, p.199).

Synthetic surfactants, also known as surface active agents, have foundwide applicability in the formulation of emulsions and have beenreviewed in the literature (Rieger, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms,Lieberman, Rieger and Banker (Eds.), 1988, Marcel Dekker, Inc., NewYork, N.Y., volume 1, p. 285; Idson, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms,Lieberman, Rieger and Banker (Eds.), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York,N.Y., 1988, volume 1, p. 199). Surfactants are typically amphiphilic andcomprise a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic portion. The ratio of thehydrophilic to the hydrophobic nature of the surfactant has been termedthe hydrophile/lipophile balance (HLB) and is a valuable tool incategorizing and selecting surfactants in the preparation offormulations. Surfactants may be classified into different classes basedon the nature of the hydrophilic group: nonionic, anionic, cationic andamphoteric (Rieger, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman, Riegerand Banker (Eds.), 1988, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., volume 1,p. 285).

Naturally occurring emulsifiers used in emulsion formulations includelanolin, beeswax, phosphatides, lecithin and acacia. Absorption basespossess hydrophilic properties such that they can soak up water to formw/o emulsions yet retain their semisolid consistencies, such asanhydrous lanolin and hydrophilic petrolatum. Finely divided solids havealso been used as good emulsifiers especially in combination withsurfactants and in viscous preparations. These include polar inorganicsolids, such as heavy metal hydroxides, nonswelling clays such asbentonite, attapulgite, hectorite, kaolin, montmorillonite, colloidalaluminum silicate and colloidal magnesium aluminum silicate, pigmentsand nonpolar solids such as carbon or glyceryl tristearate.

A large variety of non-emulsifying materials are also included inemulsion formulations and contribute to the properties of emulsions.These include fats, oils, waxes, fatty acids, fatty alcohols, fattyesters, humectants, hydrophilic colloids, preservatives and antioxidants(Block, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman, Rieger and Banker(Eds.), 1988, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., volume 1, p. 335;Idson, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman, Rieger and Banker(Eds.), 1988, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., volume 1, p. 199).

Hydrophilic colloids or hydrocolloids include naturally occurring gumsand synthetic polymers such as polysaccharides (for example, acacia,agar, alginic acid, carrageenan, guar gum, karaya gum, and tragacanth),cellulose derivatives (for example, carboxymethylcellulose andcarboxypropylcellulose), and synthetic polymers (for example, carbomers,cellulose ethers, and carboxyvinyl polymers). These disperse or swell inwater to form colloidal solutions that stabilize emulsions by formingstrong interfacial films around the dispersed-phase droplets and byincreasing the viscosity of the external phase.

Since emulsions often contain a number of ingredients such ascarbohydrates, proteins, sterols and phosphatides that may readilysupport the growth of microbes, these formulations often incorporatepreservatives. Commonly used preservatives included in emulsionformulations include methyl paraben, propyl paraben, quaternary ammoniumsalts, benzalkonium chloride, esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and boricacid. Antioxidants are also commonly added to emulsion formulations toprevent deterioration of the formulation. Antioxidants used may be freeradical scavengers such as tocopherols, alkyl gallates, butylatedhydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, or reducing agents such asascorbic acid and sodium metabisulfite, and antioxidant synergists suchas citric acid, tartaric acid, and lecithin.

The application of emulsion formulations via dermatological, oral andparenteral routes and methods for their manufacture have been reviewedin the literature (Idson, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman,Rieger and Banker (Eds.), 1988, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.,volume 1, p. 199). Emulsion formulations for oral delivery have beenvery widely used because of reasons of ease of formulation, efficacyfrom an absorption and bioavailability standpoint. (Rosoff, inPharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman, Rieger and Banker (Eds.), 1988,Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., volume 1, p. 245; Idson, inPharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman, Rieger and Banker (Eds.), 1988,Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., volume 1, p. 199). Mineral-oil baselaxatives, oil-soluble vitamins and high fat nutritive preparations areamong the materials that have commonly been administered orally as o/wemulsions.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the compositions ofoligonucleotides and nucleic acids are formulated as microemulsions. Amicroemulsion may be defined as a system of water, oil and amphiphilewhich is a single optically isotropic and thermodynamically stableliquid solution (Rosoff, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman,Rieger and Banker (Eds.), 1988, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.,volume 1, p. 245). Typically microemulsions are systems that areprepared by first dispersing an oil in an aqueous surfactant solutionand then adding a sufficient amount of a fourth component, generally anintermediate chain-length alcohol to form a transparent system.Therefore, microemulsions have also been described as thermodynamicallystable, isotropically clear dispersions of two immiscible liquids thatare stabilized by interfacial films of surface-active molecules (Leungand Shah, in: Controlled Release of Drugs: Polymers and AggregateSystems, Rosoff, M., Ed., 1989, VCH Publishers, New York, pages185-215). Microemulsions commonly are prepared via a combination ofthree to five components that include oil, water, surfactant,cosurfactant and electrolyte. Whether the microemulsion is of thewater-in-oil (w/o) or an oil-in-water (o/w) type is dependent on theproperties of the oil and surfactant used and on the structure andgeometric packing of the polar heads and hydrocarbon tails of thesurfactant molecules (Schott, in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences,Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa., 1985, p. 271).

The phenomenological approach utilizing phase diagrams has beenextensively studied and has yielded a comprehensive knowledge, to oneskilled in the art, of how to formulate microemulsions (Rosoff, inPharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman, Rieger and Banker (Eds.), 1988,Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., volume 1, p. 245; Block, inPharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Lieberman, Rieger and Banker (Eds.), 1988,Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., volume 1, p. 335). Compared toconventional emulsions, microemulsions offer the advantage ofsolubilizing water-insoluble drugs in a formulation of thermodynamicallystable droplets that are formed spontaneously.

Surfactants used in the preparation of microemulsions include, but arenot limited to, ionic surfactants, non-ionic surfactants, Brij 96,polyoxyethylene oleyl ethers, polyglycerol fatty acid esters,tetraglycerol monolaurate (ML310), tetraglycerol monooleate (MO310),hexaglycerol monooleate (PO310), hexaglycerol pentaoleate (PO500),decaglycerol monocaprate (MCA750), decaglycerol monooleate (MO750),decaglycerol sequioleate (SO750), decaglycerol decaoleate (DAO750),alone or in combination with cosurfactants. The cosurfactant, usually ashort-chain alcohol such as ethanol, 1-propanol, and 1-butanol, servesto increase the interfacial fluidity by penetrating into the surfactantfilm and consequently creating a disordered film because of the voidspace generated among surfactant molecules. Microemulsions may, however,be prepared without the use of cosurfactants and alcohol-freeself-emulsifying microemulsion systems are known in the art. The aqueousphase may typically be, but is not limited to, water, an aqueoussolution of the drug, glycerol, PEG300, PEG400, polyglycerols, propyleneglycols, and derivatives of ethylene glycol. The oil phase may include,but is not limited to, materials such as Captex 300, Captex 355, CapmulMCM, fatty acid esters, medium chain (C8-C12) mono, di, andtri-glycerides, polyoxyethylated glyceryl fatty acid esters, fattyalcohols, polyglycolized glycerides, saturated polyglycolized C8-C10glycerides, vegetable oils and silicone oil.

Microemulsions are particularly of interest from the standpoint of drugsolubilization and the enhanced absorption of drugs. Lipid basedmicroemulsions (both o/w and w/o) have been proposed to enhance the oralbioavailability of drugs, including peptides (Constantinides et al.,Pharmaceutical Research, 1994, 11, 1385-1390; Ritschel, Meth. Find. Exp.Clin. Pharmacol., 1993, 13, 205). Microemulsions afford advantages ofimproved drug solubilization, protection of drug from enzymatichydrolysis, possible enhancement of drug absorption due tosurfactant-induced alterations in membrane fluidity and permeability,ease of preparation, ease of oral administration over solid dosageforms, improved clinical potency, and decreased toxicity (Constantinideset al., Pharmaceutical Research, 1994, 11, 1385; Ho et al., J. Pharm.Sci., 1996, 85, 138-143). Often microemulsions may form spontaneouslywhen their components are brought together at ambient temperature. Thismay be particularly advantageous when formulating thermolabile drugs,peptides or oligonucleotides. Microemulsions have also been effective inthe transdermal delivery of active components in both cosmetic andpharmaceutical applications. It is expected that the microemulsioncompositions and formulations of the present invention will facilitatethe increased systemic absorption of oligonucleotides and nucleic acidsfrom the gastrointestinal tract, as well as improve the local cellularuptake of oligonucleotides and nucleic acids within the gastrointestinaltract, vagina, buccal cavity and other areas of administration.

Microemulsions of the present invention may also contain additionalcomponents and additives such as sorbitan monostearate (Grill 3),Labrasol, and penetration enhancers to improve the properties of theformulation and to enhance the absorption of the oligonucleotides andnucleic acids of the present invention. Penetration enhancers used inthe microemulsions of the present invention may be classified asbelonging to one of five broad categories—surfactants, fatty acids, bilesalts, chelating agents, and non-chelating non-surfactants (Lee et al.,Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1991, p. 92). Eachof these classes has been discussed above.

Liposomes

There are many organized surfactant structures besides microemulsionsthat have been studied and used for the formulation of drugs. Theseinclude monolayers, micelles, bilayers and vesicles. Vesicles, such asliposomes, have attracted great interest because of their specificityand the duration of action they offer from the standpoint of drugdelivery. As used in the present invention, the term “liposome” means avesicle composed of amphiphilic lipids arranged in a spherical bilayeror bilayers.

Liposomes are unilamellar or multilamellar vesicles which have amembrane formed from a lipophilic material and an aqueous interior. Theaqueous portion contains the composition to be delivered. Cationicliposomes possess the advantage of being able to fuse to the cell wall.Non-cationic liposomes, although not able to fuse as efficiently withthe cell wall, are taken up by macrophages in vivo.

In order to cross intact mammalian skin, lipid vesicles must passthrough a series of fine pores, each with a diameter less than 50 nm,under the influence of a suitable transdermal gradient. Therefore, it isdesirable to use a liposome which is highly deformable and able to passthrough such fine pores.

Further advantages of liposomes include; liposomes obtained from naturalphospholipids are biocompatible and biodegradable; liposomes canincorporate a wide range of water and lipid soluble drugs; liposomes canprotect encapsulated drugs in their internal compartments frommetabolism and degradation (Rosoff, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms,Lieberman, Rieger and Banker (Eds.), 1988, Marcel Dekker, Inc., NewYork, N.Y., volume 1, p. 245). Important considerations in thepreparation of liposome formulations are the lipid surface charge,vesicle size and the aqueous volume of the liposomes.

Liposomes are useful for the transfer and delivery of active ingredientsto the site of action. Because the liposomal membrane is structurallysimilar to biological membranes, when liposomes are applied to a tissue,the liposomes start to merge with the cellular membranes. As the mergingof the liposome and cell progresses, the liposomal contents are emptiedinto the cell where the active agent may act.

Liposomal formulations have been the focus of extensive investigation asthe mode of delivery for many drugs. There is growing evidence that fortopical administration, liposomes present several advantages over otherformulations. Such advantages include reduced side-effects related tohigh systemic absorption of the administered drug, increasedaccumulation of the administered drug at the desired target, and theability to administer a wide variety of drugs, both hydrophilic andhydrophobic, into the skin.

Several reports have detailed the ability of liposomes to deliver agentsincluding high-molecular weight DNA into the skin. Compounds includinganalgesics, antibodies, hormones and high-molecular weight DNAs havebeen administered to the skin. The majority of applications resulted inthe targeting of the upper epidermis.

Liposomes fall into two broad classes. Cationic liposomes are positivelycharged liposomes which interact with the negatively charged DNAmolecules to form a stable complex. The positively charged DNA/liposomecomplex binds to the negatively charged cell surface and is internalizedin an endosome. Due to the acidic pH within the endosome, the liposomesare ruptured, releasing their contents into the cell cytoplasm (Wang etal., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1987, 147, 980-985).

Liposomes which are pH-sensitive or negatively-charged, entrap DNArather than complex with it. Since both the DNA and the lipid aresimilarly charged, repulsion rather than complex formation occurs.Nevertheless, some DNA is entrapped within the aqueous interior of theseliposomes. pH-sensitive liposomes have been used to deliver DNA encodingthe thymidine kinase gene to cell monolayers in culture. Expression ofthe exogenous gene was detected in the target cells (Zhou et al.,Journal of Controlled Release, 1992, 19, 269-274).

One major type of liposomal composition includes phospholipids otherthan naturally-derived phosphatidylcholine. Neutral liposomecompositions, for example, can be formed from dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) or dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC).Anionic liposome compositions generally are formed from dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol, while anionic fusogenic liposomes are formedprimarily from dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE). Another type ofliposomal composition is formed from phosphatidylcholine (PC) such as,for example, soybean PC, and egg PC. Another type is formed frommixtures of phospholipid and/or phosphatidylcholine and/or cholesterol.

Several studies have assessed the topical delivery of liposomal drugformulations to the skin. Application of liposomes containing interferonto guinea pig skin resulted in a reduction of skin herpes sores whiledelivery of interferon via other means (e.g. as a solution or as anemulsion) were ineffective (Weiner et al., Journal of Drug Targeting,1992, 2, 405-410). Further, an additional study tested the efficacy ofinterferon administered as part of a liposomal formulation to theadministration of interferon using an aqueous system, and concluded thatthe liposomal formulation was superior to aqueous administration (duPlessis et al., Antiviral Research, 1992, 18, 259-265).

Non-ionic liposomal systems have also been examined to determine theirutility in the delivery of drugs to the skin, in particular systemscomprising non-ionic surfactant and cholesterol. Non-ionic liposomalformulations comprising Novasome™ I (glyceryldilaurate/cholesterol/polyoxyethylene-10-stearyl ether) and Novasome™ II(glyceryl distearate/cholesterol/polyoxyethylene-10-stearyl ether) wereused to deliver cyclosporin-A into the dermis of mouse skin. Resultsindicated that such non-ionic liposomal systems were effective infacilitating the deposition of cyclosporin-A into different layers ofthe skin (Hu et al. S.T.P.Pharma. Sci., 1994, 4, 6, 466).

Liposomes also include “sterically stabilized” liposomes, a term which,as used herein, refers to liposomes comprising one or more specializedlipids that, when incorporated into liposomes, result in enhancedcirculation lifetimes relative to liposomes lacking such specializedlipids. Examples of sterically stabilized liposomes are those in whichpart of the vesicle-forming lipid portion of the liposome (A) comprisesone or more glycolipids, such as monosialoganglioside G_(M1), or (B) isderivatized with one or more hydrophilic polymers, such as apolyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety. While not wishing to be bound by anyparticular theory, it is thought in the art that, at least forsterically stabilized liposomes containing gangliosides, sphingomyelin,or PEG-derivatized lipids, the enhanced circulation half-life of thesesterically stabilized liposomes derives from a reduced uptake into cellsof the reticuloendothelial system (RES) (Allen et al., FEBS Letters,1987, 223, 42; Wu et al., Cancer Research, 1993, 53, 3765). Variousliposomes comprising one or more glycolipids are known in the art.Papahadjopoulos et al. (Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1987, 507, 64) reportedthe ability of monosialoganglioside G_(M1), galactocerebroside sulfateand phosphatidylinositol to improve blood half-lives of liposomes. Thesefindings were expounded upon by Gabizon et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A., 1988, 85, 6949). U.S. Pat. No. 4,837,028 and WO 88/04924, bothto Allen et al., disclose liposomes comprising (1) sphingomyelin and (2)the ganglioside G_(M1) or a galactocerebroside sulfate ester. U.S. Pat.No. 5,543,152 (Webb et al.) discloses liposomes comprisingsphingomyelin. Liposomes comprising1,2-sn-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine are disclosed in WO 97/13499 (Limet al.).

Many liposomes comprising lipids derivatized with one or morehydrophilic polymers, and methods of preparation thereof, are known inthe art. Sunamoto et al. (Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1980, 53, 2778)described liposomes comprising a nonionic detergent, 2C₁₂15G, thatcontains a PEG moiety. Illum et al. (FEBS Lett., 1984, 167, 79) notedthat hydrophilic coating of polystyrene particles with polymeric glycolsresults in significantly enhanced blood half-lives. Syntheticphospholipids modified by the attachment of carboxylic groups ofpolyalkylene glycols (e.g., PEG) are described by Sears (U.S. Pat. Nos.4,426,330 and 4,534,899). Klibanov et al. (FEBS Lett., 1990, 268, 235)described experiments demonstrating that liposomes comprisingphosphatidylethanolamine (PE) derivatized with PEG or PEG stearate havesignificant increases in blood circulation half-lives. Blume et al.(Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1990, 1029, 91) extended suchobservations to other PEG-derivatized phospholipids, e.g., DSPE-PEG,formed from the combination of distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DSPE)and PEG. Liposomes having covalently bound PEG moieties on theirexternal surface are described in European Patent No. EP 0 445 131 B1and WO 90/04384 to Fisher. Liposome compositions containing 1-20 molepercent of PE derivatized with PEG, and methods of use thereof, aredescribed by Woodle et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,013,556 and 5,356,633) andMartin et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,213,804 and European Patent No. EP 0 496813 B1). Liposomes comprising a number of other lipid-polymer conjugatesare disclosed in WO 91/05545 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,225,212 (both to Martinet al.) and in WO 94/20073 (Zalipsky et al.) Liposomes comprisingPEG-modified ceramide lipids are described in WO 96/10391 (Choi et al.).U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,935 (Miyazaki et al.) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,556,948(Tagawa et al.) describe PEG-containing liposomes that can be furtherderivatized with functional moieties on their surfaces.

A limited number of liposomes comprising nucleic acids are known in theart. WO 96/40062 to Thierry et al. discloses methods for encapsulatinghigh molecular weight nucleic acids in liposomes. U.S. Pat. No.5,264,221 to Tagawa et al. discloses protein-bonded liposomes andasserts that the contents of such liposomes may include an antisenseRNA. U.S. Pat. No. 5,665,710 to Rahman et al. describes certain methodsof encapsulating oligodeoxynucleotides in liposomes. WO 97/04787 to Loveet al. discloses liposomes comprising antisense oligonucleotidestargeted to the raf gene.

Transfersomes are yet another type of liposomes, and are highlydeformable lipid aggregates which are attractive candidates for drugdelivery vehicles. Transfersomes may be described as lipid dropletswhich are so highly deformable that they are easily able to penetratethrough pores which are smaller than the droplet. Transfersomes areadaptable to the environment in which they are used, e.g. they areself-optimizing (adaptive to the shape of pores in the skin),self-repairing, frequently reach their targets without fragmenting, andoften self-loading. To make transfersomes it is possible to add surfaceedge-activators, usually surfactants, to a standard liposomalcomposition. Transfersomes have been used to deliver serum albumin tothe skin. The transfersome-mediated delivery of serum albumin has beenshown to be as effective as subcutaneous injection of a solutioncontaining serum albumin.

Surfactants find wide application in formulations such as emulsions(including microemulsions) and liposomes. The most common way ofclassifying and ranking the properties of the many different types ofsurfactants, both natural and synthetic, is by the use of thehydrophile/lipophile balance (HLB). The nature of the hydrophilic group(also known as the “head”) provides the most useful means forcategorizing the different surfactants used in formulations (Rieger, inPharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1988,p. 285).

If the surfactant molecule is not ionized, it is classified as anonionic surfactant. Nonionic surfactants find wide application inpharmaceutical and cosmetic products and are usable over a wide range ofpH values. In general their HLB values range from 2 to about 18depending on their structure. Nonionic surfactants include nonionicesters such as ethylene glycol esters, propylene glycol esters, glycerylesters, polyglyceryl esters, sorbitan esters, sucrose esters, andethoxylated esters. Nonionic alkanolamides and ethers such as fattyalcohol ethoxylates, propoxylated alcohols, and ethoxylated/propoxylatedblock polymers are also included in this class. The polyoxyethylenesurfactants are the most popular members of the nonionic surfactantclass.

If the surfactant molecule carries a negative charge when it isdissolved or dispersed in water, the surfactant is classified asanionic. Anionic surfactants include carboxylates such as soaps, acyllactylates, acyl amides of amino acids, esters of sulfuric acid such asalkyl sulfates and ethoxylated alkyl sulfates, sulfonates such as alkylbenzene sulfonates, acyl isethionates, acyl taurates andsulfosuccinates, and phosphates. The most important members of theanionic surfactant class are the alkyl sulfates and the soaps.

If the surfactant molecule carries a positive charge when it isdissolved or dispersed in water, the surfactant is classified ascationic. Cationic surfactants include quaternary ammonium salts andethoxylated amines. The quaternary ammonium salts are the most usedmembers of this class.

If the surfactant molecule has the ability to carry either a positive ornegative charge, the surfactant is classified as amphoteric. Amphotericsurfactants include acrylic acid derivatives, substituted alkylamides,N-alkylbetaines and phosphatides.

The use of surfactants in drug products, formulations and in emulsionshas been reviewed (Rieger, in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, MarcelDekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1988, p. 285).

Penetration Enhancers

In one embodiment, the present invention employs various penetrationenhancers to effect the efficient delivery of nucleic acids,particularly oligonucleotides, to the skin of animals. Most drugs arepresent in solution in both ionized and nonionized forms. However,usually only lipid soluble or lipophilic drugs readily cross cellmembranes. It has been discovered that even non-lipophilic drugs maycross cell membranes if the membrane to be crossed is treated with apenetration enhancer. In addition to aiding the diffusion ofnon-lipophilic drugs across cell membranes, penetration enhancers alsoenhance the permeability of lipophilic drugs.

Penetration enhancers may be classified as belonging to one of fivebroad categories, i.e., surfactants, fatty acids, bile salts, chelatingagents, and non-chelating non-surfactants (Lee et al., Critical Reviewsin Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1991, p. 92). Each of the abovementioned classes of penetration enhancers are described below ingreater detail.

Surfactants: In connection with the present invention, surfactants (or“surface-active agents”) are chemical entities which, when dissolved inan aqueous solution, reduce the surface tension of the solution or theinterfacial tension between the aqueous solution and another liquid,with the result that absorption of oligonucleotides through the mucosais enhanced. In addition to bile salts and fatty acids, thesepenetration enhancers include, for example, sodium lauryl sulfate,polyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether and polyoxyethylene-20-cetyl ether) (Leeet al., Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1991, p.92); and perfluorochemical emulsions, such as FC-43. Takahashi et al.,J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 1988, 40, 252).

Fatty acids: Various fatty acids and their derivatives which act aspenetration enhancers include, for example, oleic acid, lauric acid,capric acid (n-decanoic acid), myristic acid, palmitic acid, stearicacid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, dicaprate, tricaprate, monoolein(1-monooleoyl-rac-glycerol), dilaurin, caprylic acid, arachidonic acid,glycerol 1-monocaprate, 1-dodecylazacycloheptan-2-one, acylcarnitines,acylcholines, C₁₋₁₀ alkyl esters thereof (e.g., methyl, isopropyl andt-butyl), and mono- and di-glycerides thereof (i.e., oleate, laurate,caprate, myristate, palmitate, stearate, linoleate, etc.) (Lee et al.,Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1991, p. 92;Muranishi, Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1990,7, 1-33; El Hariri et al., J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 1992, 44, 651-654).

Bile salts: The physiological role of bile includes the facilitation ofdispersion and absorption of lipids and fat-soluble vitamins (Brunton,Chapter 38 in: Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis ofTherapeutics, 9th Ed., Hardman et al. Eds., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996,pp. 934-935). Various natural bile salts, and their syntheticderivatives, act as penetration enhancers. Thus the term “bile salts”includes any of the naturally occurring components of bile as well asany of their synthetic derivatives. The bile salts of the inventioninclude, for example, cholic acid (or its pharmaceutically acceptablesodium salt, sodium cholate), dehydrocholic acid (sodiumdehydrocholate), deoxycholic acid (sodium deoxycholate), glucholic acid(sodium glucholate), glycholic acid (sodium glycocholate),glycodeoxycholic acid (sodium glycodeoxycholate), taurocholic acid(sodium taurocholate), taurodeoxycholic acid (sodium taurodeoxycholate),chenodeoxycholic acid (sodium chenodeoxycholate), ursodeoxycholic acid(UDCA), sodium tauro-24,25-dihydro-fusidate (STDHF), sodiumglycodihydrofusidate and polyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether (POE) (Lee etal., Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1991, page92; Swinyard, Chapter 39 In: Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18thEd., Gennaro, ed., Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa., 1990, pages782-783; Muranishi, Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug CarrierSystems, 1990, 7, 1-33; Yamamoto et al., J. Pharm. Exp. Ther., 1992,263, 25; Yamashita et al., J. Pharm. Sci., 1990, 79, 579-583).

Chelating Agents: Chelating agents, as used in connection with thepresent invention, can be defined as compounds that remove metallic ionsfrom solution by forming complexes therewith, with the result thatabsorption of oligonucleotides through the mucosa is enhanced. Withregards to their use as penetration enhancers in the present invention,chelating agents have the added advantage of also serving as DNaseinhibitors, as most characterized DNA nucleases require a divalent metalion for catalysis and are thus inhibited by chelating agents (Jarrett,J. Chromatogr., 1993, 618, 315-339). Chelating agents of the inventioninclude but are not limited to disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate(EDTA), citric acid, salicylates (e.g., sodium salicylate,5-methoxysalicylate and homovanilate), N-acyl derivatives of collagen,laureth-9 and N-amino acyl derivatives of beta-diketones (enamines) (Leeet al., Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1991, page92; Muranishi, Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems,1990, 7, 1-33; Buur et al., J. Control Rel., 1990, 14, 43-51).

Non-chelating non-surfactants: As used herein, non-chelatingnon-surfactant penetration enhancing compounds can be defined ascompounds that demonstrate insignificant activity as chelating agents oras surfactants but that nonetheless enhance absorption ofoligonucleotides through the alimentary mucosa (Muranishi, CriticalReviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1990, 7, 1-33). This classof penetration enhancers include, for example, unsaturated cyclic ureas,1-alkyl- and 1-alkenylazacyclo-alkanone derivatives (Lee et al.,Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1991, page 92);and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents such as diclofenac sodium,indomethacin and phenylbutazone (Yamashita et al., J. Pharm. Pharmacol.,1987, 39, 621-626).

Agents that enhance uptake of oligonucleotides at the cellular level mayalso be added to the pharmaceutical and other compositions of thepresent invention. For example, cationic lipids, such as lipofectin(Junichi et al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,705,188), cationic glycerol derivatives,and polycationic molecules, such as polylysine (Lollo et al., PCTApplication WO 97/30731), are also known to enhance the cellular uptakeof oligonucleotides.

Other agents may be utilized to enhance the penetration of theadministered nucleic acids, including glycols such as ethylene glycoland propylene glycol, pyrrols such as 2-pyrrol, azones, and terpenessuch as limonene and menthone.

Carriers

Certain compositions of the present invention also incorporate carriercompounds in the formulation. As used herein, “carrier compound” or“carrier” can refer to a nucleic acid, or analog thereof, which is inert(i.e., does not possess biological activity per se) but is recognized asa nucleic acid by in vivo processes that reduce the bioavailability of anucleic acid having biological activity by, for example, degrading thebiologically active nucleic acid or promoting its removal fromcirculation. The coadministration of a nucleic acid and a carriercompound, typically with an excess of the latter substance, can resultin a substantial reduction of the amount of nucleic acid recovered inthe liver, kidney or other extracirculatory reservoirs, presumably dueto competition between the carrier compound and the nucleic acid for acommon receptor. For example, the recovery of a partiallyphosphorothioate oligonucleotide in hepatic tissue can be reduced whenit is coadministered with polyinosinic acid, dextran sulfate,polycytidic acid or 4-acetamido-4′isothiocyano-stilbene-2,2′-disulfonicacid (Miyao et al., Antisense Res. Dev., 1995, 5, 115-121; Takakura etal., Antisense & Nucl. Acid Drug Dev., 1996, 6, 177-183).

Excipients

In contrast to a carrier compound, a “pharmaceutical carrier” or“excipient” is a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent, suspending agentor any other pharmacologically inert vehicle for delivering one or morenucleic acids to an animal. The excipient may be liquid or solid and isselected, with the planned manner of administration in mind, so as toprovide for the desired bulk, consistency, etc., when combined with anucleic acid and the other components of a given pharmaceuticalcomposition. Typical pharmaceutical carriers include, but are notlimited to, binding agents (e.g., pregelatinized maize starch,polyvinylpyrrolidone or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, etc.); fillers(e.g., lactose and other sugars, microcrystalline cellulose, pectin,gelatin, calcium sulfate, ethyl cellulose, polyacrylates or calciumhydrogen phosphate, etc.); lubricants (e.g., magnesium stearate, talc,silica, colloidal silicon dioxide, stearic acid, metallic stearates,hydrogenated vegetable oils, corn starch, polyethylene glycols, sodiumbenzoate, sodium acetate, etc.); disintegrants (e.g., starch, sodiumstarch glycolate, etc.); and wetting agents (e.g., sodium laurylsulphate, etc.).

Pharmaceutically acceptable organic or inorganic excipient suitable fornon-parenteral administration which do not deleteriously react withnucleic acids can also be used to formulate the compositions of thepresent invention. Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carriersinclude, but are not limited to, water, salt solutions, alcohols,polyethylene glycols, gelatin, lactose, amylose, magnesium stearate,talc, silicic acid, viscous paraffin, hydroxymethylcellulose,polyvinylpyrrolidone and the like.

Formulations for topical administration of nucleic acids may includesterile and non-sterile aqueous solutions, non-aqueous solutions incommon solvents such as alcohols, or solutions of the nucleic acids inliquid or solid oil bases. The solutions may also contain buffers,diluents and other suitable additives. Pharmaceutically acceptableorganic or inorganic excipients suitable for non-parenteraladministration which do not deleteriously react with nucleic acids canbe used.

Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable excipients include, but are notlimited to, water, salt solutions, alcohol, polyethylene glycols,gelatin, lactose, amylose, magnesium stearate, talc, silicic acid,viscous paraffin, hydroxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone and thelike.

Other Components

The compositions of the present invention may additionally contain otheradjunct components conventionally found in pharmaceutical compositions,at their art-established usage levels. Thus, for example, thecompositions may contain additional, compatible, pharmaceutically-activematerials such as, for example, antipruritics, astringents, localanesthetics or anti-inflammatory agents, or may contain additionalmaterials useful in physically formulating various dosage forms of thecompositions of the present invention, such as dyes, flavoring agents,preservatives, antioxidants, opacifiers, thickening agents andstabilizers. However, such materials, when added, should not undulyinterfere with the biological activities of the components of thecompositions of the present invention. The formulations can besterilized and, if desired, mixed with auxiliary agents, e.g.,lubricants, preservatives, stabilizers, wetting agents, emulsifiers,salts for influencing osmotic pressure, buffers, colorings, flavoringsand/or aromatic substances and the like which do not deleteriouslyinteract with the nucleic acid(s) of the formulation.

Aqueous suspensions may contain substances which increase the viscosityof the suspension including, for example, sodium carboxymethylcellulose,sorbitol and/or dextran. The suspension may also contain stabilizers.

Certain embodiments of the invention provide pharmaceutical compositionscontaining (a) one or more antisense compounds and (b) one or more otherchemotherapeutic agents which function by a non-antisense mechanism.Examples of such chemotherapeutic agents include but are not limited todaunorubicin, daunomycin, dactinomycin, doxorubicin, epirubicin,idarubicin, esorubicin, bleomycin, mafosfamide, ifosfamide, cytosinearabinoside, bis-chloroethylnitrosurea, busulfan, mitomycin C,actinomycin D, mithramycin, prednisone, hydroxyprogesterone,testosterone, tamoxifen, dacarbazine, procarbazine, hexamethylmelamine,pentamethylmelamine, mitoxantrone, amsacrine, chlorambucil,methylcyclohexylnitrosurea, nitrogen mustards, melphalan,cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, cytarabine,5-azacytidine, hydroxyurea, deoxycoformycin,4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphoramide, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU),5-fluorodeoxyuridine (5-FUdR), methotrexate (MTX), colchicine, taxol,vincristine, vinblastine, etoposide (VP-16), trimetrexate, irinotecan,topotecan, gemcitabine, teniposide, cisplatin and diethylstilbestrol(DES). See, generally, The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy, 15thEd. 1987, pp. 1206-1228, Berkow et al., eds., Rahway, N.J. When usedwith the compounds of the invention, such chemotherapeutic agents may beused individually (e.g., 5-FU and oligonucleotide), sequentially (e.g.,5-FU and oligonucleotide for a period of time followed by MTX andoligonucleotide), or in combination with one or more other suchchemotherapeutic agents (e.g., 5-FU, MTX and oligonucleotide, or 5-FU,radiotherapy and oligonucleotide). Anti-inflammatory drugs, includingbut not limited to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs andcorticosteroids, and antiviral drugs, including but not limited toribivirin, vidarabine, acyclovir and ganciclovir, may also be combinedin compositions of the invention. See, generally, The Merck Manual ofDiagnosis and Therapy, 15th Ed., Berkow et al., eds., 1987, Rahway,N.J., pages 2499-2506 and 46-49, respectively). Other non-antisensechemotherapeutic agents are also within the scope of this invention. Twoor more combined compounds may be used together or sequentially.

In another related embodiment, compositions of the invention may containone or more antisense compounds, particularly oligonucleotides, targetedto a first nucleic acid and one or more additional antisense compoundstargeted to a second nucleic acid target. Numerous examples of antisensecompounds are known in the art. Two or more combined compounds may beused together or sequentially.

The formulation of therapeutic compositions and their subsequentadministration is believed to be within the skill of those in the art.Dosing is dependent on severity and responsiveness of the disease stateto be treated, with the course of treatment lasting from several days toseveral months, or until a cure is effected or a diminution of thedisease state is achieved. Optimal dosing schedules can be calculatedfrom measurements of drug accumulation in the body of the patient.Persons of ordinary skill can easily determine optimum dosages, dosingmethodologies and repetition rates. Optimum dosages may vary dependingon the relative potency of individual oligonucleotides, and cangenerally be estimated based on EC₅₀s found to be effective in in vitroand in vivo animal models. In general, dosage is from 0.01 ug to 100 gper kg of body weight, and may be given once or more daily, weekly,monthly or yearly, or even once every 2 to 20 years. Persons of ordinaryskill in the art can easily estimate repetition rates for dosing basedon measured residence times and concentrations of the drug in bodilyfluids or tissues. Following successful treatment, it may be desirableto have the patient undergo maintenance therapy to prevent therecurrence of the disease state, wherein the oligonucleotide isadministered in maintenance doses, ranging from 0.01 ug to 100 g per kgof body weight, once or more daily, to once every 20 years.

While the present invention has been described with specificity inaccordance with certain of its preferred embodiments, the followingexamples serve only to illustrate the invention and are not intended tolimit the same.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Nucleoside Phosphoramidites for OligonucleotideSynthesis Deoxy and 2′-alkoxy amidites

2′-Deoxy and 2′-methoxy beta-cyanoethyldiisopropyl phosphoramidites werepurchased from commercial sources (e.g. Chemgenes, Needham Mass. or GlenResearch, Inc. Sterling Va.). Other 2′-O-alkoxy substituted nucleosideamidites are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,506,351, hereinincorporated by reference. For oligonucleotides synthesized using2′-alkoxy amidites, the standard cycle for unmodified oligonucleotideswas utilized, except the wait step after pulse delivery of tetrazole andbase was increased to 360 seconds.

Oligonucleotides containing 5-methyl-2′-deoxycytidine (5-Me-C)nucleotides were synthesized according to published methods [Sanghvi,et. al., Nucleic Acids Research, 1993, 21, 3197-3203] using commerciallyavailable phosphoramidites (Glen Research, Sterling Va. or ChemGenes,Needham Mass.).

2′-Fluoro amidites 2′-Fluorodeoxyadenosine amidites

2′-fluoro oligonucleotides were synthesized as described previously[Kawasaki, et. al., J. Med. Chem., 1993, 36, 831-841] and U.S. Pat. No.5,670,633, herein incorporated by reference. Briefly, the protectednucleoside N6-benzoyl-2′-deoxy-2′-fluoroadenosine was synthesizedutilizing commercially available 9-beta-D-arabinofuranosyladenine asstarting material and by modifying literature procedures whereby the2′-alpha-fluoro atom is introduced by a S_(N)2-displacement of a2′-beta-trityl group. Thus N6-benzoyl-9-beta-D-arabinofuranosyladeninewas selectively protected in moderate yield as the3′,5′-ditetrahydropyranyl (THP) intermediate. Deprotection of the THPand N6-benzoyl groups was accomplished using standard methodologies andstandard methods were used to obtain the 5′-dimethoxytrityl-(DMT) and5′-DMT-3′-phosphoramidite intermediates.

2′-Fluorodeoxyguanosine

The synthesis of 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoroguanosine was accomplished usingtetraisopropyldisiloxanyl (TPDS) protected9-beta-D-arabinofuranosylguanine as starting material, and conversion tothe intermediate diisobutyrylarabinofuranosylguanosine. Deprotection ofthe TPDS group was followed by protection of the hydroxyl group with THPto give diisobutyryl di-THP protected arabinofuranosylguanine. SelectiveO-deacylation and triflation was followed by treatment of the crudeproduct with fluoride, then deprotection of the THP groups. Standardmethodologies were used to obtain the 5′-DMT- and5′-DMT-3′-phosphoramidites.

2′-Fluorouridine

Synthesis of 2′-deoxy-2′-fluorouridine was accomplished by themodification of a literature procedure in which2,2′-anhydro-1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyluracil was treated with 70%hydrogen fluoride-pyridine. Standard procedures were used to obtain the5′-DMT and 5′-DMT-3′phosphoramidites.

2′-Fluorodeoxycytidine

2′-deoxy-2′-fluorocytidine was synthesized via amination of2′-deoxy-2′-fluorouridine, followed by selective protection to giveN4-benzoyl-2′-deoxy-2′-fluorocytidine. Standard procedures were used toobtain the 5′-DMT and 5′-DMT-3′phosphoramidites.

2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl) Modified Amidites

2′-O-Methoxyethyl-substituted nucleoside amidites are prepared asfollows, or alternatively, as per the methods of Martin, P., HelveticaChimica Acta, 1995, 78, 486-504.

2,2′-Anhydro[1-(beta-D-arabinofuranosyl)-5-methyluridine]

5-Methyluridine (ribosylthymine, commercially available through Yamasa,Choshi, Japan) (72.0 g, 0.279 M), diphenylcarbonate (90.0 g, 0.420 M)and sodium bicarbonate (2.0 g, 0.024 M) were added to DMF (300 mL). Themixture was heated to reflux, with stirring, allowing the evolved carbondioxide gas to be released in a controlled manner. After 1 hour, theslightly darkened solution was concentrated under reduced pressure. Theresulting syrup was poured into diethylether (2.5 L), with stirring. Theproduct formed a gum. The ether was decanted and the residue wasdissolved in a minimum amount of methanol (ca. 400 mL). The solution waspoured into fresh ether (2.5 L) to yield a stiff gum. The ether wasdecanted and the gum was dried in a vacuum oven (60° C. at 1 mm Hg for24 h) to give a solid that was crushed to a light tan powder (57 g, 85%crude yield). The NMR spectrum was consistent with the structure,contaminated with phenol as its sodium salt (ca. 5%). The material wasused as is for further reactions (or it can be purified further bycolumn chromatography using a gradient of methanol in ethyl acetate(10-25%) to give a white solid, mp 222-4° C.).

2′-O-Methoxyethyl-5-methyluridine

2,2′-Anhydro-5-methyluridine (195 g, 0.81 M), tris(2-methoxyethyl)borate(231 g, 0.98 M) and 2-methoxyethanol (1.2 L) were added to a 2 Lstainless steel pressure vessel and placed in a pre-heated oil bath at160° C. After heating for 48 hours at 155-160° C., the vessel was openedand the solution evaporated to dryness and triturated with MeOH (200mL). The residue was suspended in hot acetone (1 L). The insoluble saltswere filtered, washed with acetone (150 mL) and the filtrate evaporated.The residue (280 g) was dissolved in CH₃CN (600 mL) and evaporated. Asilica gel column (3 kg) was packed in CH₂Cl₂/acetone/MeOH (20:5:3)containing 0.5% Et₃NH. The residue was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (250 mL) andadsorbed onto silica (150 g) prior to loading onto the column. Theproduct was eluted with the packing solvent to give 160 g (63%) ofproduct. Additional material was obtained by reworking impure fractions.

2′-O-Methoxyethyl-5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-5-methyluridine

2′-O-Methoxyethyl-5-methyluridine (160 g, 0.506 M) was co-evaporatedwith pyridine (250 mL) and the dried residue dissolved in pyridine (1.3L). A first aliquot of dimethoxytrityl chloride (94.3 g, 0.278 M) wasadded and the mixture stirred at room temperature for one hour. A secondaliquot of dimethoxytrityl chloride (94.3 g, 0.278 M) was added and thereaction stirred for an additional one hour. Methanol (170 mL) was thenadded to stop the reaction. HPLC showed the presence of approximately70% product. The solvent was evaporated and triturated with CH₃CN (200mL). The residue was dissolved in CHCl₃ (1.5 L) and extracted with 2×500mL of saturated NaHCO₃ and 2×500 mL of saturated NaCl. The organic phasewas dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and evaporated. 275 g of residue wasobtained. The residue was purified on a 3.5 kg silica gel column, packedand eluted with EtOAc/hexane/acetone (5:5:1) containing 0.5% Et₃NH. Thepure fractions were evaporated to give 164 g of product. Approximately20 g additional was obtained from the impure fractions to give a totalyield of 183 g (57%).

3′-O-Acetyl-2′-O-methoxyethyl-5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-5-methyluridine

2′-O-Methoxyethyl-5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-5-methyluridine (106 g, 0.167 M),DMF/pyridine (750 mL of a 3:1 mixture prepared from 562 mL of DMF and188 mL of pyridine) and acetic anhydride (24.38 mL, 0.258 M) werecombined and stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. The reaction wasmonitored by TLC by first quenching the TLC sample with the addition ofMeOH. Upon completion of the reaction, as judged by TLC, MeOH (50 mL)was added and the mixture evaporated at 35° C. The residue was dissolvedin CHCl₃ (800 mL) and extracted with 2×200 mL of saturated sodiumbicarbonate and 2×200 mL of saturated NaCl. The water layers were backextracted with 200 mL of CHCl₃. The combined organics were dried withsodium sulfate and evaporated to give 122 g of residue (approx. 90%product). The residue was purified on a 3.5 kg silica gel column andeluted using EtOAc/hexane (4:1). Pure product fractions were evaporatedto yield 96 g (84%). An additional 1.5 g was recovered from laterfractions.

3′-O-Acetyl-2′-O-methoxyethyl-5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-5-methyl-4-triazoleuridine

A first solution was prepared by dissolving3′-O-acetyl-2′-O-methoxyethyl-5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-5-methyluridine (96g, 0.144 M) in CH₃CN (700 mL) and set aside. Triethylamine (189 mL, 1.44M) was added to a solution of triazole (90 g, 1.3 M) in CH₃CN (1 L),cooled to −5° C. and stirred for 0.5 h using an overhead stirrer. POCl₃was added dropwise, over a 30 minute period, to the stirred solutionmaintained at 0-10° C., and the resulting mixture stirred for anadditional 2 hours. The first solution was added dropwise, over a 45minute period, to the latter solution. The resulting reaction mixturewas stored overnight in a cold room. Salts were filtered from thereaction mixture and the solution was evaporated. The residue wasdissolved in EtOAc (1 L) and the insoluble solids were removed byfiltration. The filtrate was washed with 1×300 mL of NaHCO₃ and 2×300 mLof saturated NaCl, dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated. The residuewas triturated with EtOAc to give the title compound.

2′-O-Methoxyethyl-5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-5-methylcytidine

A solution of3′-O-acetyl-2′-O-methoxyethyl-5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-5-methyl-4-triazoleuridine(103 g, 0.141 M) in dioxane (500 mL) and NH₄OH (30 mL) was stirred atroom temperature for 2 hours. The dioxane solution was evaporated andthe residue azeotroped with MeOH (2×200 mL). The residue was dissolvedin MeOH (300 mL) and transferred to a 2 liter stainless steel pressurevessel. MeOH (400 mL) saturated with NH₃ gas was added and the vesselheated to 100° C. for 2 hours (TLC showed complete conversion). Thevessel contents were evaporated to dryness and the residue was dissolvedin EtOAc (500 mL) and washed once with saturated NaCl (200 mL). Theorganics were dried over sodium sulfate and the solvent was evaporatedto give 85 g (95%) of the title compound.

N4-Benzoyl-2′-O-methoxyethyl-5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-5-methylcytidine

2′-O-Methoxyethyl-5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-5-methylcytidine (85 g, 0.134 M)was dissolved in DMF (800 mL) and benzoic anhydride (37.2 g, 0.165 M)was added with stirring. After stirring for 3 hours, TLC showed thereaction to be approximately 95% complete. The solvent was evaporatedand the residue azeotroped with MeOH (200 mL). The residue was dissolvedin CHCl₃ (700 mL) and extracted with saturated NaHCO₃ (2×300 mL) andsaturated NaCl (2×300 mL), dried over MgSO₄ and evaporated to give aresidue (96 g). The residue was chromatographed on a 1.5 kg silicacolumn using EtOAc/hexane (1:1) containing 0.5% Et₃NH as the elutingsolvent. The pure product fractions were evaporated to give 90 g (90%)of the title compound.

N4-Benzoyl-2′-O-methoxyethyl-5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-5-methylcytidine-3′-amidite

N4-Benzoyl-2′-O-methoxyethyl-5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-5-methylcytidine (74g, 0.10 M) was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (1 L). Tetrazole diisopropylamine(7.1 g) and 2-cyanoethoxy-tetra(isopropyl)phosphite (40.5 mL, 0.123 M)were added with stirring, under a nitrogen atmosphere. The resultingmixture was stirred for 20 hours at room temperature (TLC showed thereaction to be 95% complete). The reaction mixture was extracted withsaturated NaHCO₃ (1×300 mL) and saturated NaCl (3×300 mL). The aqueouswashes were back-extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (300 mL), and the extracts werecombined, dried over MgSO₄ and concentrated. The residue obtained waschromatographed on a 1.5 kg silica column using EtOAc/hexane (3:1) asthe eluting solvent. The pure fractions were combined to give 90.6 g(87%) of the title compound.

2′-O-(Aminooxyethyl) nucleoside amidites and2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl) nucleoside amidites2′-(Dimethylaminooxyethoxy) nucleoside amidites

2′-(Dimethylaminooxyethoxy) nucleoside amidites [also known in the artas 2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl) nucleoside amidites] are prepared asdescribed in the following paragraphs. Adenosine, cytidine and guanosinenucleoside amidites are prepared similarly to the thymidine(5-methyluridine) except the exocyclic amines are protected with abenzoyl moiety in the case of adenosine and cytidine and with isobutyrylin the case of guanosine.

5′-O-tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl-O²-2′-anhydro-5-methyluridine

O²-2′-anhydro-5-methyluridine (Pro. Bio. Sint., Varese, Italy, 100.0 g,0.416 mmol), dimethylaminopyridine (0.66 g, 0.013 eq, 0.0054 mmol) weredissolved in dry pyridine (500 ml) at ambient temperature under an argonatmosphere and with mechanical stirring. tert-Butyldiphenylchlorosilane(125.8 g, 119.0 mL, 1.1 eq, 0.458 mmol) was added in one portion. Thereaction was stirred for 16 h at ambient temperature. TLC (Rf 0.22,ethyl acetate) indicated a complete reaction. The solution wasconcentrated under reduced pressure to a thick oil. This was partitionedbetween dichloromethane (1 L) and saturated sodium bicarbonate (2×1 L)and brine (1 L). The organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate andconcentrated under reduced pressure to a thick oil. The oil wasdissolved in a 1:1 mixture of ethyl acetate and ethyl ether (600 mL) andthe solution was cooled to −10° C. The resulting crystalline product wascollected by filtration, washed with ethyl ether (3×200 mL) and dried(40° C., 1 mm Hg, 24 h) to 149 g (74.8%) of white solid. TLC and NMRwere consistent with pure product.

5′-O-tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O-(2-hydroxyethyl)-5-methyluridine

In a 2 L stainless steel, unstirred pressure reactor was added borane intetrahydrofuran (1.0 M, 2.0 eq, 622 mL). In the fume hood and withmanual stirring, ethylene glycol (350 mL, excess) was added cautiouslyat first until the evolution of hydrogen gas subsided.5′-O-tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl-O²-2′-anhydro-5-methyluridine (149 g, 0.311mol) and sodium bicarbonate (0.074 g, 0.003 eq) were added with manualstirring. The reactor was sealed and heated in an oil bath until aninternal temperature of 160° C. was reached and then maintained for 16 h(pressure <100 psig). The reaction vessel was cooled to ambient andopened. TLC (Rf 0.67 for desired product and Rf 0.82 for ara-T sideproduct, ethyl acetate) indicated about 70% conversion to the product.In order to avoid additional side product formation, the reaction wasstopped, concentrated under reduced pressure (10 to 1 mm Hg) in a warmwater bath (40-100° C.) with the more extreme conditions used to removethe ethylene glycol. [Alternatively, once the low boiling solvent isgone, the remaining solution can be partitioned between ethyl acetateand water. The product will be in the organic phase.] The residue waspurified by column chromatography (2 kg silica gel, ethylacetate-hexanes gradient 1:1 to 4:1). The appropriate fractions werecombined, stripped and dried to product as a white crisp foam (84 g,50%), contaminated starting material (17.4 g) and pure reusable startingmaterial 20 g. The yield based on starting material less pure recoveredstarting material was 58%. TLC and NMR were consistent with 99% pureproduct.

2′-O-([2-phthalimidoxy)ethyl]-5′-t-butyldiphenylsilyl-5-methyluridine

5′-O-tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O-(2-hydroxyethyl)-5-methyluridine (20g, 36.98 mmol) was mixed with triphenylphosphine (11.63 g, 44.36 mmol)and N-hydroxyphthalimide (7.24 g, 44.36 mmol). It was then dried overP₂O₅ under high vacuum for two days at 40° C. The reaction mixture wasflushed with argon and dry THF (369.8 mL, Aldrich, sure seal bottle) wasadded to get a clear solution. Diethyl-azodicarboxylate (6.98 mL, 44.36mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture. The rate of additionis maintained such that resulting deep red coloration is just dischargedbefore adding the next drop. After the addition was complete, thereaction was stirred for 4 hrs. By that time TLC showed the completionof the reaction (ethylacetate:hexane, 60:40). The solvent was evaporatedin vacuum. Residue obtained was placed on a flash column and eluted withethyl acetate:hexane (60:40), to get2′-O-([2-phthalimidoxy)ethyl]-5′-t-butyldiphenylsilyl-5-methyluridine aswhite foam (21.819 g, 86%).

5′-O-tert-butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O-[(2-formadoximinooxy)ethyl]-5-methyluridine

2′-O-([2-phthalimidoxy)ethyl]-5′-t-butyldiphenylsilyl-5-methyluridine(3.1 g, 4.5 mmol) was dissolved in dry CH₂Cl₂ (4.5 mL) andmethylhydrazine (300 mL, 4.64 mmol) was added dropwise at −10° C. to 0°C. After 1 h the mixture was filtered, the filtrate was washed with icecold CH₂Cl₂ and the combined organic phase was washed with water, brineand dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The solution was concentrated to get2′-O-(aminooxyethyl) thymidine, which was then dissolved in MeOH (67.5mL). To this formaldehyde (20% aqueous solution, w/w, 1.1 eq.) was addedand the resulting mixture was stirred for 1 h. Solvent was removed undervacuum; residue chromatographed to get5′-O-tert-butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O-[(2-formadoximinooxy)ethyl]-5-methyluridine as white foam (1.95 g, 78%).

5′-O-tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O—[N,N-dimethylaminooxyethyl]-5-methyluridine

5′-O-tert-butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O-[(2-formadoximinooxy)ethyl]-5-methyluridine(1.77 g, 3.12 mmol) was dissolved in a solution of 1M pyridiniump-toluenesulfonate (PPTS) in dry MeOH (30.6 mL). Sodium cyanoborohydride(0.39 g, 6.13 mmol) was added to this solution at 10° C. under inertatmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for 10 minutes at 10° C.After that the reaction vessel was removed from the ice bath and stirredat room temperature for 2 h, the reaction monitored by TLC (5% MeOH inCH₂Cl₂). Aqueous NaHCO₃ solution (5%, 10 mL) was added and extractedwith ethyl acetate (2×20 mL). Ethyl acetate phase was dried overanhydrous Na₂SO₄, evaporated to dryness. Residue was dissolved in asolution of 1M PPTS in MeOH (30.6 mL). Formaldehyde (20% w/w, 30 mL,3.37 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at roomtemperature for 10 minutes. Reaction mixture cooled to 10° C. in an icebath, sodium cyanoborohydride (0.39 g, 6.13 mmol) was added and reactionmixture stirred at 10° C. for 10 minutes. After 10 minutes, the reactionmixture was removed from the ice bath and stirred at room temperaturefor 2 hrs. To the reaction mixture 5% NaHCO₃ (25 mL) solution was addedand extracted with ethyl acetate (2×25 mL). Ethyl acetate layer wasdried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄ and evaporated to dryness. The residueobtained was purified by flash column chromatography and eluted with 5%MeOH in CH₂Cl₂ to get5′-O-tert-butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O—[N,N-dimethylaminooxyethyl]-5-methyluridineas a white foam (14.6 g, 80%).

2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine

Triethylamine trihydrofluoride (3.91 mL, 240 mmol) was dissolved in dryTHF and triethylamine (1.67 mL, 12 mmol, dry, kept over KOH). Thismixture of triethylamine-2HF was then added to5′-O-tert-butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O—[N,N-dimethylaminooxyethyl]-5-methyluridine(1.40 g, 2.4 mmol) and stirred at room temperature for 24 hrs. Reactionwas monitored by TLC (5% MeOH in CH₂Cl₂). Solvent was removed undervacuum and the residue placed on a flash column and eluted with 10% MeOHin CH₂Cl₂ to get 2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine (766 mg,92.5%).

5′-O-DMT-2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine

2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine (750 mg, 2.17 mmol) wasdried over P₂O₅ under high vacuum overnight at 40° C. It was thenco-evaporated with anhydrous pyridine (20 mL). The residue obtained wasdissolved in pyridine (11 mL) under argon atmosphere.4-dimethylaminopyridine (26.5 mg, 2.60 mmol), 4,4′-dimethoxytritylchloride (880 mg, 2.60 mmol) was added to the mixture and the reactionmixture was stirred at room temperature until all of the startingmaterial disappeared. Pyridine was removed under vacuum and the residuechromatographed and eluted with 10% MeOH in CH₂Cl₂ (containing a fewdrops of pyridine) to get5′-O-DMT-2′-O-(dimethylamino-oxyethyl)-5-methyluridine (1.13 g, 80%).

5′-O-DMT-2′-O-(2-N,N-dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine-3′-[(2-cyanoethyl)-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite]

5′-O-DMT-2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine (1.08 g, 1.67mmol) was co-evaporated with toluene (20 mL). To the residueN,N-diisopropylamine tetrazonide (0.29 g, 1.67 mmol) was added and driedover P₂O₅ under high vacuum overnight at 40° C. Then the reactionmixture was dissolved in anhydrous acetonitrile (8.4 mL) and2-cyanoethyl-N,N,N¹,N¹-tetraisopropylphosphoramidite (2.12 mL, 6.08mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperaturefor 4 hrs under inert atmosphere. The progress of the reaction wasmonitored by TLC (hexane:ethyl acetate 1:1). The solvent was evaporated,then the residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (70 mL) and washed with5% aqueous NaHCO₃ (40 mL). Ethyl acetate layer was dried over anhydrousNa₂SO₄ and concentrated. Residue obtained was chromatographed (ethylacetate as eluent) to get5′-O-DMT-2′-O-(2-N,N-dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine-3′-[(2-cyanoethyl)-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite]as a foam (1.04 g, 74.9%).

2′-(Aminooxyethoxy) nucleoside amidites

2′-(Aminooxyethoxy) nucleoside amidites [also known in the art as2′-O-(aminooxyethyl) nucleoside amidites] are prepared as described inthe following paragraphs. Adenosine, cytidine and thymidine nucleosideamidites are prepared similarly.

N2-isobutyryl-6-O-diphenylcarbamoyl-2′-O-(2-ethylacetyl)-5′-O-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)guanosine-3′-[(2-cyanoethyl)-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite]

The 2′-O-aminooxyethyl guanosine analog may be obtained by selective2′-O-alkylation of diaminopurine riboside. Multigram quantities ofdiaminopurine riboside may be purchased from Schering AG (Berlin) toprovide 2′-O-(2-ethylacetyl) diaminopurine riboside along with a minoramount of the 3′-O-isomer. 2′-O-(2-ethylacetyl) diaminopurine ribosidemay be resolved and converted to 2′-O-(2-ethylacetyl)guanosine bytreatment with adenosine deaminase. (McGee, D. P. C., Cook, P. D.,Guinosso, C. J., WO 94/02501 A1 940203.) Standard protection proceduresshould afford 2′-O-(2-ethylacetyl)-5′-O-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)guanosineand2-N-isobutyryl-6-O-diphenylcarbamoyl-2′-O-(2-ethylacetyl)-5′-O-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)guanosinewhich may be reduced to provide2-N-isobutyryl-6-O-diphenylcarbamoyl-2′-O-(2-hydroxyethyl)-5′-O-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)guanosine.As before the hydroxyl group may be displaced by N-hydroxyphthalimidevia a Mitsunobu reaction, and the protected nucleoside mayphosphitylated as usual to yield2-N-isobutyryl-6-O-diphenylcarbamoyl-2′-O-([2-phthalmidoxy]ethyl)-5′-O-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)guanosine-3′-[(2-cyanoethyl)-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite].

2′-dimethylaminoethoxyethoxy (2′-DMAEOE) nucleoside amidites

2′-dimethylaminoethoxyethoxy nucleoside amidites (also known in the artas 2′-O-dimethylamino-ethoxyethyl, i.e., 2′-O—CH₂—O—CH₂—N(CH₂)₂, or2′-DMAEOE nucleoside amidites) are prepared as follows. Other nucleosideamidites are prepared similarly.

2′-O-[2(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy)ethyl]-5-methyl uridine

2-[2-(Dimethylamino)ethoxy]ethanol (Aldrich, 6.66 g, 50 mmol) is slowlyadded to a solution of borane in tetrahydrofuran (1 M, 10 mL, 10 mmol)with stirring in a 100 mL bomb. Hydrogen gas evolves as the soliddissolves. O²-,2′-anhydro-5-methyluridine (1.2 g, 5 mmol), and sodiumbicarbonate (2.5 mg) are added and the bomb is sealed, placed in an oilbath and heated to 155° C. for 26 hours. The bomb is cooled to roomtemperature and opened. The crude solution is concentrated and theresidue partitioned between water (200 mL) and hexanes (200 mL). Theexcess phenol is extracted into the hexane layer. The aqueous layer isextracted with ethyl acetate (3×200 mL) and the combined organic layersare washed once with water, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate andconcentrated. The residue is columned on silica gel usingmethanol/methylene chloride 1:20 (which has 2% triethylamine) as theeluent. As the column fractions are concentrated a colorless solid formswhich is collected to give the title compound as a white solid.

5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-[2(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy)ethyl)]-5-methyluridine

To 0.5 g (1.3 mmol) of2′-O-[2(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy)ethyl)]-5-methyl uridine in anhydrouspyridine (8 mL), triethylamine (0.36 mL) and dimethoxytrityl chloride(DMT-Cl, 0.87 g, 2 eq.) are added and stirred for 1 hour. The reactionmixture is poured into water (200 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (2×200mL). The combined CH₂Cl₂ layers are washed with saturated NaHCO₃solution, followed by saturated NaCl solution and dried over anhydroussodium sulfate. Evaporation of the solvent followed by silica gelchromatography using MeOH:CH₂Cl₂:Et₃N (20:1, v/v, with 1% triethylamine)gives the title compound.

5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-[2(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy)ethyl)]-5-methyluridine-3′-O-(cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropyl)phosphoramidite

Diisopropylaminotetrazolide (0.6 g) and 2-cyanoethoxy-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite (1.1 mL, 2 eq.) are added to a solution of5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-[2(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy)ethyl)]-5-methyluridine(2.17 g, 3 mmol) dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (20 mL) under an atmosphere ofargon. The reaction mixture is stirred overnight and the solventevaporated. The resulting residue is purified by silica gel flash columnchromatography with ethyl acetate as the eluent to give the titlecompound.

Example 2 Oligonucleotide Synthesis

Unsubstituted and substituted phosphodiester (P═O) oligonucleotides aresynthesized on an automated DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems model380B) using standard phosphoramidite chemistry with oxidation by iodine.

Phosphorothioates (P═S) are synthesized as for the phosphodiesteroligonucleotides except the standard oxidation bottle was replaced by0.2 M solution of 3H-1,2-benzodithiole-3-one 1,1-dioxide in acetonitrilefor the stepwise thiation of the phosphite linkages. The thiation waitstep was increased to 68 sec and was followed by the capping step. Aftercleavage from the CPG column and deblocking in concentrated ammoniumhydroxide at 55° C. (18 h), the oligonucleotides were purified byprecipitating twice with 2.5 volumes of ethanol from a 0.5 M NaClsolution. Phosphinate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S.Pat. No. 5,508,270, herein incorporated by reference.

Alkyl phosphonate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S.Pat. No. 4,469,863, herein incorporated by reference.

3′-Deoxy-3′-methylene phosphonate oligonucleotides are prepared asdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,610,289 or 5,625,050, herein incorporatedby reference.

Phosphoramidite oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat.No. 5,256,775 or U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,878, herein incorporated byreference.

Alkylphosphonothioate oligonucleotides are prepared as described inpublished PCT applications PCT/US94/00902 and PCT/US93/06976 (publishedas WO 94/17093 and WO 94/02499, respectively), herein incorporated byreference.

3′-Deoxy-3′-amino phosphoramidate oligonucleotides are prepared asdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,476,925, herein incorporated by reference.

Phosphotriester oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat.No. 5,023,243, herein incorporated by reference.

Borano phosphate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat.Nos. 5,130,302 and 5,177,198, both herein incorporated by reference.

Example 3 Oligonucleoside Synthesis

Methylenemethylimino linked oligonucleosides, also identified as MMIlinked oligonucleosides, methylenedimethylhydrazo linkedoligonucleosides, also identified as MDH linked oligonucleosides, andmethylenecarbonylamino linked oligonucleosides, also identified asamide-3 linked oligonucleosides, and methyleneaminocarbonyl linkedoligonucleosides, also identified as amide-4 linked oligonucleosides, aswell as mixed backbone compounds having, for instance, alternating MMIand P═O or P═S linkages are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. Nos.5,378,825, 5,386,023, 5,489,677, 5,602,240 and 5,610,289, all of whichare herein incorporated by reference.

Formacetal and thioformacetal linked oligonucleosides are prepared asdescribed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,264,562 and 5,264,564, herein incorporatedby reference.

Ethylene oxide linked oligonucleosides are prepared as described in U.S.Pat. No. 5,223,618, herein incorporated by reference.

Example 4 PNA Synthesis

Peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) are prepared in accordance with any of thevarious procedures referred to in Peptide Nucleic Acids (PNA):Synthesis, Properties and Potential Applications, Bioorganic & MedicinalChemistry, 1996, 4, 5-23. They may also be prepared in accordance withU.S. Pat. Nos. 5,539,082, 5,700,922, and 5,719,262, herein incorporatedby reference.

Example 5 Synthesis of Chimeric Oligonucleotides

Chimeric oligonucleotides, oligonucleosides or mixedoligonucleotides/oligonucleosides of the invention can be of severaldifferent types. These include a first type wherein the “gap” segment oflinked nucleosides is positioned between 5′ and 3′ “wing” segments oflinked nucleosides and a second “open end” type wherein the “gap”segment is located at either the 3′ or the 5′ terminus of the oligomericcompound. Oligonucleotides of the first type are also known in the artas “gapmers” or gapped oligonucleotides. Oligonucleotides of the secondtype are also known in the art as “hemimers” or “wingmers”.

[2′-O-Me]-[2′-deoxy]-[2′-O-Me] Chimeric PhosphorothioateOligonucleotides

Chimeric oligonucleotides having 2′-O-alkyl phosphorothioate and2′-deoxy phosphorothioate oligonucleotide segments are synthesized usingan Applied Biosystems automated DNA synthesizer Model 380B, as above.Oligonucleotides are synthesized using the automated synthesizer and2′-deoxy-5′-dimethoxytrityl-3′-O-phosphoramidite for the DNA portion and5′-dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-methyl-3′-O-phosphoramidite for 5′ and 3′ wings.The standard synthesis cycle is modified by increasing the wait stepafter the delivery of tetrazole and base to 600 s repeated four timesfor RNA and twice for 2′-O-methyl. The fully protected oligonucleotideis cleaved from the support and the phosphate group is deprotected in3:1 ammonia/ethanol at room temperature overnight then lyophilized todryness. Treatment in methanolic ammonia for 24 hrs at room temperatureis then done to deprotect all bases and sample was again lyophilized todryness. The pellet is resuspended in 1M TBAF in THF for 24 hrs at roomtemperature to deprotect the 2′ positions. The reaction is then quenchedwith 1M TEAA and the sample is then reduced to ½ volume by rotovacbefore being desalted on a G25 size exclusion column. The oligorecovered is then analyzed spectrophotometrically for yield and forpurity by capillary electrophoresis and by mass spectrometry.

[2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl)]-[2′-deoxy]-[2′-O-(Methoxyethyl)] ChimericPhosphorothioate Oligonucleotides

[2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)]-[2′-deoxy]-4-[2′-O-(methoxyethyl)] chimericphosphorothioate oligonucleotides were prepared as per the procedureabove for the 2′-O-methyl chimeric oligonucleotide, with thesubstitution of 2′-O-(methoxyethyl) amidites for the 2′-O-methylamidites.

[2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl)Phosphodiester]-[2′-deoxyPhosphorothioate]-[2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl) Phosphodiester] ChimericOligonucleotides

[2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl phosphodiester]-[2′-deoxyphosphorothioate]-[2′-O-(methoxyethyl) phosphodiester] chimericoligonucleotides are prepared as per the above procedure for the2′-O-methyl chimeric oligonucleotide with the substitution of2′-O-(methoxyethyl) amidites for the 2′-O-methyl amidites, oxidizationwith iodine to generate the phosphodiester internucleotide linkageswithin the wing portions of the chimeric structures and sulfurizationutilizing 3,H-1,2 benzodithiole-3-one 1,1 dioxide (Beaucage Reagent) togenerate the phosphorothioate internucleotide linkages for the centergap.

Other chimeric oligonucleotides, chimeric oligonucleosides and mixedchimeric oligonucleotides/oligonucleosides are synthesized according toU.S. Pat. No. 5,623,065, herein incorporated by reference.

Example 6 Oligonucleotide Isolation

After cleavage from the controlled pore glass column (AppliedBiosystems) and deblocking in concentrated ammonium hydroxide at 55° C.for 18 hours, the oligonucleotides or oligonucleosides are purified byprecipitation twice out of 0.5 M NaCl with 2.5 volumes ethanol.Synthesized oligonucleotides were analyzed by polyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis on denaturing gels and judged to be at least 85% fulllength material. The relative amounts of phosphorothioate andphosphodiester linkages obtained in synthesis were periodically checkedby ³¹P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and for some studiesoligonucleotides were purified by HPLC, as described by Chiang et al.,J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 18162-18171. Results obtained withHPLC-purified material were similar to those obtained with non-HPLCpurified material.

Example 7 Oligonucleotide Synthesis 96 Well Plate Format

Oligonucleotides were synthesized via solid phase P(III) phosphoramiditechemistry on an automated synthesizer capable of assembling 96 sequencessimultaneously in a standard 96 well format. Phosphodiesterinternucleotide linkages were afforded by oxidation with aqueous iodine.Phosphorothioate internucleotide linkages were generated bysulfurization utilizing 3,H-1,2 benzodithiole-3-one 1,1 dioxide(Beaucage Reagent) in anhydrous acetonitrile. Standard base-protectedbeta-cyanoethyldiisopropyl phosphoramidites were purchased fromcommercial vendors (e.g. PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., orPharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.). Non-standard nucleosides are synthesizedas per known literature or patented methods. They are utilized as baseprotected beta-cyanoethyldiisopropyl phosphoramidites.

Oligonucleotides were cleaved from support and deprotected withconcentrated NH₄OH at elevated temperature (55-60° C.) for 12-16 hoursand the released product then dried in vacuo. The dried product was thenre-suspended in sterile water to afford a master plate from which allanalytical and test plate samples are then diluted utilizing roboticpipettors.

Example 8 Oligonucleotide Analysis 96 Well Plate Format

The concentration of oligonucleotide in each well was assessed bydilution of samples and UV absorption spectroscopy. The full-lengthintegrity of the individual products was evaluated by capillaryelectrophoresis (CE) in either the 96 well format (Beckman P/ACE™ MDQ)or, for individually prepared samples, on a commercial CE apparatus(e.g., Beckman P/ACE™ 5000, ABI 270). Base and backbone composition wasconfirmed by mass analysis of the compounds utilizing electrospray-massspectroscopy. All assay test plates were diluted from the master plateusing single and multi-channel robotic pipettors. Plates were judged tobe acceptable if at least 85% of the compounds on the plate were atleast 85% full length.

Example 9 Cell Culture and Oligonucleotide Treatment

The effect of antisense compounds on target nucleic acid expression canbe tested in any of a variety of cell types provided that the targetnucleic acid is present at measurable levels. This can be routinelydetermined using, for example, PCR or Northern blot analysis. Thefollowing 4 cell types are provided for illustrative purposes, but othercell types can be routinely used, provided that the target is expressedin the cell type chosen. This can be readily determined by methodsroutine in the art, for example Northern blot analysis, Ribonucleaseprotection assays, or RT-PCR.

T-24 Cells:

The human transitional cell bladder carcinoma cell line T-24 wasobtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas,Va.). T-24 cells were routinely cultured in complete McCoy's 5A basalmedia (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.) supplemented with 10%fetal calf serum (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.),penicillin 100 units per mL, and streptomycin 100 micrograms per mL(Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.). Cells were routinelypassaged by trypsinization and dilution when they reached 90%confluence. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates (Falcon-Primaria#3872) at a density of 7000 cells/well for use in RT-PCR analysis.

For Northern blotting or other analysis, cells may be seeded onto 100 mmor other standard tissue culture plates and treated similarly, usingappropriate volumes of medium and oligonucleotide.

A549 Cells:

The human lung carcinoma cell line A549 was obtained from the AmericanType Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, Va.). A549 cells wereroutinely cultured in DMEM basal media (Gibco/Life Technologies,Gaithersburg, Md.) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco/LifeTechnologies, Gaithersburg, Md.), penicillin 100 units per mL, andstreptomycin 100 micrograms per mL (Gibco/Life Technologies,Gaithersburg, Md.). Cells were routinely passaged by trypsinization anddilution when they reached 90% confluence.

NHDF Cells:

Human neonatal dermal fibroblast (NHDF) were obtained from the CloneticsCorporation (Walkersville Md.). NHDFs were routinely maintained inFibroblast Growth Medium (Clonetics Corporation, Walkersville Md.)supplemented as recommended by the supplier. Cells were maintained forup to 10 passages as recommended by the supplier.

HEK Cells:

Human embryonic keratinocytes (HEK) were obtained from the CloneticsCorporation (Walkersville Md.). HEKs were routinely maintained inKeratinocyte Growth Medium (Clonetics Corporation, Walkersville Md.)formulated as recommended by the supplier. Cells were routinelymaintained for up to 10 passages as recommended by the supplier.

Treatment with Antisense Compounds:

When cells reached 80% confluency, they were treated witholigonucleotide. For cells grown in 96-well plates, wells were washedonce with 200 μL OPTI-MEM™-1 reduced-serum medium (Gibco BRL) and thentreated with 130 μL of OPTI-MEM™-1 containing 3.75 μg/mL LIPOFECTIN™(Gibco BRL) and the desired concentration of oligonucleotide. After 4-7hours of treatment, the medium was replaced with fresh medium. Cellswere harvested 16-24 hours after oligonucleotide treatment.

The concentration of oligonucleotide used varies from cell line to cellline. To determine the optimal oligonucleotide concentration for aparticular cell line, the cells are treated with a positive controloligonucleotide at a range of concentrations. For human cells thepositive control oligonucleotide is ISIS 13920, TCCGTCATCGCTCCTCAGGG,SEQ ID NO: 1, a 2′-O-methoxyethyl gapmer (2′-O-methoxyethyls shown inbold) with a phosphorothioate backbone which is targeted to human H-ras.For mouse or rat cells the positive control oligonucleotide is ISIS15770, ATGCATTCTGCCCCCAAGGA, SEQ ID NO: 2, a 2′-O-methoxyethyl gapmer(2′-O-methoxyethyls shown in bold) with a phosphorothioate backbonewhich is targeted to both mouse and rat c-raf. The concentration ofpositive control oligonucleotide that results in 80% inhibition ofc-Ha-ras (for ISIS 13920) or c-raf (for ISIS 15770) mRNA is thenutilized as the screening concentration for new oligonucleotides insubsequent experiments for that cell line. If 80% inhibition is notachieved, the lowest concentration of positive control oligonucleotidethat results in 60% inhibition of H-ras or c-raf mRNA is then utilizedas the oligonucleotide screening concentration in subsequent experimentsfor that cell line. If 60% inhibition is not achieved, that particularcell line is deemed as unsuitable for oligonucleotide transfectionexperiments.

Example 10 Analysis of Oligonucleotide Inhibition of SuperoxideDismutase 1, Soluble Expression

Antisense modulation of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble expression canbe assayed in a variety of ways known in the art. For example,superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA levels can be quantitated by, e.g.,Northern blot analysis, competitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR), orreal-time PCR (RT-PCR). Real-time quantitative PCR is presentlypreferred. RNA analysis can be performed on total cellular RNA orpoly(A)+ mRNA. Methods of RNA isolation are taught in, for example,Ausubel, F. M. et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 1,pp. 4.1.1-4.2.9 and 4.5.1-4.5.3, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993. Northernblot analysis is routine in the art and is taught in, for example,Ausubel, F. M. et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 1,pp. 4.2.1-4.2.9, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996. Real-time quantitative(PCR) can be conveniently accomplished using the commercially availableABI PRISM™ 7700 Sequence Detection System, available from PE-AppliedBiosystems, Foster City, Calif. and used according to manufacturer'sinstructions.

Protein levels of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble can be quantitated ina variety of ways well known in the art, such as immunoprecipitation,Western blot analysis (immunoblotting), ELISA or fluorescence-activatedcell sorting (FACS). Antibodies directed to superoxide dismutase 1,soluble can be identified and obtained from a variety of sources, suchas the MSRS catalog of antibodies (Aerie Corporation, Birmingham,Mich.), or can be prepared via conventional antibody generation methods.Methods for preparation of polyclonal antisera are taught in, forexample, Ausubel, F. M. et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology,Volume 2, pp. 11.12.1-11.12.9, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997.Preparation of monoclonal antibodies is taught in, for example, Ausubel,F. M. et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 2, pp.11.4.1-11.11.5, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997.

Immunoprecipitation methods are standard in the art and can be found at,for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., Current Protocols in MolecularBiology, Volume 2, pp. 10.16.1-10.16.11, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.Western blot (immunoblot) analysis is standard in the art and can befound at, for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., Current Protocols inMolecular Biology, Volume 2, pp. 10.8.1-10.8.21, John Wiley & Sons,Inc., 1997. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are standard inthe art and can be found at, for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., CurrentProtocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 2, pp. 11.2.1-11.2.22, John Wiley& Sons, Inc., 1991.

Example 11 Poly(A)+ mRNA Isolation

Poly(A)+ mRNA was isolated according to Miura et al., Clin. Chem., 1996,42, 1758-1764. Other methods for poly(A)+ mRNA isolation are taught in,for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., Current Protocols in MolecularBiology, Volume 1, pp. 4.5.1-4.5.3, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993.Briefly, for cells grown on 96-well plates, growth medium was removedfrom the cells and each well was washed with 200 μL cold PBS. 60 μLlysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.5% NP-40,20 mM vanadyl-ribonucleoside complex) was added to each well, the platewas gently agitated and then incubated at room temperature for fiveminutes. 55 μL of lysate was transferred to Oligo d(T) coated 96-wellplates (AGCT Inc., Irvine Calif.). Plates were incubated for 60 minutesat room temperature, washed 3 times with 200 μL of wash buffer (10 mMTris-HCl pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 0.3 M NaCl). After the final wash, the platewas blotted on paper towels to remove excess wash buffer and thenair-dried for 5 minutes. 60 μL of elution buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6),preheated to 70° C. was added to each well, the plate was incubated on a90° C. hot plate for 5 minutes, and the eluate was then transferred to afresh 96-well plate.

Cells grown on 100 mm or other standard plates may be treated similarly,using appropriate volumes of all solutions.

Example 12 Total RNA Isolation

Total RNA was isolated using an RNEASY 96™ kit and buffers purchasedfrom Qiagen Inc. (Valencia Calif.) following the manufacturer'srecommended procedures. Briefly, for cells grown on 96-well plates,growth medium was removed from the cells and each well was washed with200 μL cold PBS. 100 μL Buffer RLT was added to each well and the platevigorously agitated for 20 seconds. 100 μL of 70% ethanol was then addedto each well and the contents mixed by pipetting three times up anddown. The samples were then transferred to the RNEASY 96™ well plateattached to a QIAVAC™ manifold fitted with a waste collection tray andattached to a vacuum source. Vacuum was applied for 15 seconds. 1 mL ofBuffer RW1 was added to each well of the RNEASY 96™ plate and the vacuumagain applied for 15 seconds. 1 mL of Buffer RPE was then added to eachwell of the RNEASY 96™ plate and the vacuum applied for a period of 15seconds. The Buffer RPE wash was then repeated and the vacuum wasapplied for an additional 10 minutes. The plate was then removed fromthe QIAVAC™ manifold and blotted dry on paper towels. The plate was thenre-attached to the QIAVAC™ manifold fitted with a collection tube rackcontaining 1.2 mL collection tubes. RNA was then eluted by pipetting 60μL water into each well, incubating 1 minute, and then applying thevacuum for 30 seconds. The elution step was repeated with an additional60 μL water.

The repetitive pipetting and elution steps may be automated using aQIAGEN Bio-Robot 9604 (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia Calif.). Essentially,after lysing of the cells on the culture plate, the plate is transferredto the robot deck where the pipetting, DNase treatment and elution stepsare carried out.

Example 13 Real-Time Quantitative PCR Analysis of Superoxide Dismutase1, Soluble mRNA Levels

Quantitation of superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA levels wasdetermined by real-time quantitative PCR using the ABI PRISM™ 7700Sequence Detection System (PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.)according to manufacturer's instructions. This is a closed-tube,non-gel-based, fluorescence detection system which allowshigh-throughput quantitation of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) productsin real-time. As opposed to standard PCR, in which amplificationproducts are quantitated after the PCR is completed, products inreal-time quantitative PCR are quantitated as they accumulate. This isaccomplished by including in the PCR reaction an oligonucleotide probethat anneals specifically between the forward and reverse PCR primers,and contains two fluorescent dyes. A reporter dye (e.g., JOE, FAM, orVIC, obtained from either Operon Technologies Inc., Alameda, Calif. orPE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) is attached to the 5′ end ofthe probe and a quencher dye (e.g., TAMRA, obtained from either OperonTechnologies Inc., Alameda, Calif. or PE-Applied Biosystems, FosterCity, Calif.) is attached to the 3′ end of the probe. When the probe anddyes are intact, reporter dye emission is quenched by the proximity ofthe 3′ quencher dye. During amplification, annealing of the probe to thetarget sequence creates a substrate that can be cleaved by the5′-exonuclease activity of Taq polymerase. During the extension phase ofthe PCR amplification cycle, cleavage of the probe by Taq polymerasereleases the reporter dye from the remainder of the probe (and hencefrom the quencher moiety) and a sequence-specific fluorescent signal isgenerated. With each cycle, additional reporter dye molecules arecleaved from their respective probes, and the fluorescence intensity ismonitored at regular intervals by laser optics built into the ABI PRISM™7700 Sequence Detection System. In each assay, a series of parallelreactions containing serial dilutions of mRNA from untreated controlsamples generates a standard curve that is used to quantitate thepercent inhibition after antisense oligonucleotide treatment of testsamples.

Prior to quantitative PCR analysis, primer-probe sets specific to thetarget gene being measured are evaluated for their ability to be“multiplexed” with a GAPDH amplification reaction. In multiplexing, boththe target gene and the internal standard gene GAPDH are amplifiedconcurrently in a single sample. In this analysis, mRNA isolated fromuntreated cells is serially diluted. Each dilution is amplified in thepresence of primer-probe sets specific for GAPDH only, target gene only(“single-plexing”), or both (multiplexing). Following PCR amplification,standard curves of GAPDH and target mRNA signal as a function ofdilution are generated from both the single-plexed and multiplexedsamples. If both the slope and correlation coefficient of the GAPDH andtarget signals generated from the multiplexed samples fall within 10% oftheir corresponding values generated from the single-plexed samples, theprimer-probe set specific for that target is deemed multiplexable. Othermethods of PCR are also known in the art.

PCR reagents were obtained from PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City,Calif. RT-PCR reactions were carried out by adding 25 μL PCR cocktail(1×TAQMAN™ buffer A, 5.5 mM MgCl₂, 300 μM each of dATP, dCTP and dGTP,600 μM of dUTP, 100 nM each of forward primer, reverse primer, andprobe, 20 Units RNAse inhibitor, 1.25 Units AMPLITAQ GOLD™, and 12.5Units MuLV reverse transcriptase) to 96 well plates containing 25 μLtotal RNA solution. The RT reaction was carried out by incubation for 30minutes at 48° C. Following a 10 minute incubation at 95° C. to activatethe AMPLITAQ GOLD™, 40 cycles of a two-step PCR protocol were carriedout: 95° C. for 15 seconds (denaturation) followed by 60° C. for 1.5minutes (annealing/extension).

Gene target quantities obtained by real time RT-PCR are normalized usingeither the expression level of GAPDH, a gene whose expression isconstant, or by quantifying total RNA using RiboGreen™ (MolecularProbes, Inc. Eugene, Oreg.). GAPDH expression is quantified by real timeRT-PCR, by being run simultaneously with the target, multiplexing, orseparately. Total RNA is quantified using RiboGreen™ RNA quantificationreagent from Molecular Probes. Methods of RNA quantification byRiboGreen™ are taught in Jones, L. J., et al, Analytical Biochemistry,1998, 265, 368-374.

In this assay, 175 μL of RiboGreen™ working reagent (RiboGreen™ reagentdiluted 1:2865 in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5) is pipetted into a96-well plate containing 25 uL purified, cellular RNA. The plate is readin a CytoFluor 4000 (PE Applied Biosystems) with excitation at 480 nmand emission at 520 nm.

Probes and primers to human superoxide dismutase 1, soluble weredesigned to hybridize to a human superoxide dismutase 1, solublesequence, using published sequence information (GenBank accession numberX02317, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO:3). For human superoxidedismutase 1, soluble the PCR primers were:

forward primer: CGTGGCCTAGCGAGTTATGG (SEQ ID NO: 4)reverse primer: GAAATTGATGATGCCCTGCA (SEQ ID NO: 5) and the PCR probewas: FAM-ACGAAGGCCGTGTGCGTGCTG-TAMRA (SEQ ID NO: 6) where FAM(PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) is the fluorescent reporterdye) and TAMRA (PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) is thequencher dye. For human GAPDH the PCR primers were:forward primer: GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC (SEQ ID NO: 7)reverse primer: GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC (SEQ ID NO: 8) and the PCR probewas: 5′ JOE-CAAGCTTCCCGTTCTCAGCC-TAMRA 3′ (SEQ ID NO: 9) where JOE(PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) is the fluorescent reporterdye) and TAMRA (PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) is thequencher dye.

Example 14 Northern Blot Analysis of Superoxide Dismutase 1, SolublemRNA Levels

Eighteen hours after antisense treatment, cell monolayers were washedtwice with cold PBS and lysed in 1 mL RNAZOL™ (TEL-TEST “B” Inc.,Friendswood, Tex.). Total RNA was prepared following manufacturer'srecommended protocols. Twenty micrograms of total RNA was fractionatedby electrophoresis through 1.2% agarose gels containing 1.1%formaldehyde using a MOPS buffer system (AMRESCO, Inc. Solon, Ohio). RNAwas transferred from the gel to HYBOND™-N+ nylon membranes (AmershamPharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.) by overnight capillary transferusing a Northern/Southern Transfer buffer system (TEL-TEST “B” Inc.,Friendswood, Tex.). RNA transfer was confirmed by UV visualization.Membranes were fixed by UV cross-linking using a STRATALINKER™ UVCrosslinker 2400 (Stratagene, Inc, La Jolla, Calif.) and then robedusing QUICKHYB™ hybridization solution (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.)using manufacturer's recommendations for stringent conditions.

To detect human superoxide dismutase 1, soluble, a human superoxidedismutase 1, soluble specific probe was prepared by PCR using theforward primer CGTGGCCTAGCGAGTTATGG (SEQ ID NO: 4) and the reverseprimer GAAATTGATGATGCCCTGCA (SEQ ID NO: 5). To normalize for variationsin loading and transfer efficiency membranes were stripped and probedfor human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) RNA(Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.).

Hybridized membranes were visualized and quantitated using aPHOSPHORIMAGER™ and IMAGEQUANT™ Software V3.3 (Molecular Dynamics,Sunnyvale, Calif.). Data was normalized to GAPDH levels in untreatedcontrols.

Example 15 Antisense Inhibition of Human Superoxide Dismutase 1, SolubleExpression by Chimeric Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides Having 2′-MOEWings and a Deoxy Gap

In accordance with the present invention, a series of oligonucleotideswas designed to target different regions of the human superoxidedismutase 1, soluble RNA, using published sequences (GenBank accessionnumber X02317, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 3, genomic sequencerepresenting residues 15001-26000 of GenBank accession numberAP000213.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 10, GenBank accessionnumber AI085992, an EST suggesting a splice variant of superoxidedismutase 1, soluble lacking exon 2, the complement of which isincorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 11, and GenBank accession numberN28535 which extends SEQ ID NO:3 in the 5′ direction, incorporatedherein as SEQ ID NO: 12). The oligonucleotides are shown in Table 1.“Target site” indicates the first (5′-most) nucleotide number on theparticular target sequence to which the oligonucleotide binds. Allcompounds in Table 1 are chimeric oligonucleotides (“gapmers”) 20nucleotides in length, composed of a central “gap” region consisting often 2′-deoxynucleotides, which is flanked on both sides (5′ and 3′directions) by five-nucleotide “wings”. The wings are composed of2′-methoxyethyl (2′-MOE)nucleotides. The internucleoside (backbone)linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S) throughout the oligonucleotide. Allcytidine residues are 5-methylcytidines. The compounds were analyzed fortheir effect on human superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA levels byquantitative real-time PCR as described in other examples herein. Dataare averages from two experiments. If present, “N.D.” indicates “nodata”.

TABLE 1Inhibition of human superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA levels by chimericphosphorothioate oligonucleotides having 2′-MOE wings and a deoxy gapTARGET SEQ SEQ TARGET   % ID ISIS # REGION ID NO SITE SEQUENCE INHIB NO146143 Coding 3 73 tcagcacgcacacggccttc 95 13 146144 Coding 3 78gcccttcagcacgcacacgg 0 14 146145 Coding 3 81 gtcgcccttcagcacgcaca 97 15150437 5′UTR 3 14 cgaggactgcaacggaaacc 0 16 150438 5′UTR 3 19ggttccgaggactgcaacgg 87 17 150439 5′UTR 3 23 tcctggttccgaggactgca 84 18150440 5′UTR 3 27 gaggtcctggttccgaggac 0 19 150441 5′UTR 3 38taggccacgccgaggtcctg 84 20 150442 Start Codon 3 53 gtcgccataactcgctaggc4 21 150443 Coding 3 96 gccctgcactgggccgtcgc 94 22 150444 Coding 3 106aattgatgatgccctgcact 62 23 150445 Coding 3 135 cactggtccattactttcct 9124 150446 Coding 3 142 acaccttcactggtccatta 93 25 150447 Coding 3 144ccacaccttcactggtccat 0 26 150448 Coding 3 161 agtcctttaatgcttcccca 86 27150449 Coding 3 173 aggccttcagtcagtccttt 29 28 150450 Coding 3 174caggccttcagtcagtcctt 90 29 150451 Coding 3 205 tatctccaaactcatgaaca 6830 150452 Coding 3 212 gctgtattatctccaaactc 90 31 150453 Coding 3 221gtacagcctgctgtattatc 69 32 150454 Coding 3 304 tgcccaagtctccaacatgc 8933 150455 Coding 3 309 cacattgcccaagtctccaa 22 34 150456 Coding 3 335tcggccacaccatctttgtc 85 35 150457 Coding 3 337 catcggccacaccatctttg 9436 150458 Coding 3 340 acacatcggccacaccatct 86 37 150459 Coding 3 343tagacacatcggccacacca 87 38 150460 Coding 3 404 accaccagtgtgcggccaat 2139 150461 Coding 3 409 catggaccaccagtgtgcgg 75 40 150462 Coding 3 410tcatggaccaccagtgtgcg 59 41 150463 Coding 3 504 ggcgatcccaattacaccac 9442 150464 Stop Codon 3 517 ggaatgtttattgggcgatc 91 43 150465 3′UTR 3 535cctcagactacatccaaggg 37 44 150466 3′UTR 3 556 gataacagatgagttaaggg 61 45150467 3′UTR 3 620 cacaattacacttttaagat 21 46 150468 3′UTR 3 625agtcacacaattacactttt 0 47 150469 3′UTR 3 658 ctcactacaggtactttaaa 50 48150470 3′UTR 3 667 aatcagtttctcactacagg 0 49 150471 3′UTR 3 670ataaatcagtttctcactac 46 50 150472 3′UTR 3 671 cataaatcagtttctcacta 47 51150473 3′UTR 3 686 aatcttccaagtgatcataa 55 52 150474 3′UTR 3 691atacaaatcttccaagtgat 48 53 150475 3′UTR 3 707 tgagttttataaaactatac 2 54150476 3′UTR 3 710 aactgagttttataaaacta 23 55 150477 3′UTR 3 721acagacattttaactgagtt 49 56 150478 3′UTR 3 727 attgaaacagacattttaac 45 57150479 3′UTR 3 729 tcattgaaacagacatttta 41 58 150480 3′UTR 3 736atacaggtcattgaaacaga 66 59 150481 3′UTR 3 761 ccatctgtgatttaagtctg  5860 150482 3′UTR 3 769 tttaatacccatctgtgatt 50 61 150483 3′UTR 3 771agtttaatacccatctgtga 43 62 150484 3′UTR 3 787 caaagaaattctgacaagtt 44 63150485 3′UTR 3 795 ttgaatgacaaagaaattct 3 64 150486 3′UTR 3 801acaggcttgaatgacaaaga 0 65 150487 3′UTR 3 805 attcacaggcttgaatgaca 0 66150488 3′UTR 3 812 ggtttttattcacaggcttg 53 67 150489 3′UTR 3 814agggtttttattcacaggct 34 68 150490 3′UTR 3 818 atacagggtttttattcaca 63 69150491 3′UTR 3 820 ccatacagggtttttattca 44 70 150492 3′UTR 3 825aagtgccatacagggttttt 40 71 150493 3′UTR 3 829 taataagtgccatacagggt 27 72150494 3′UTR 3 832 tcataataagtgccatacag 0 73 150495 3′UTR 3 833ctcataataagtgccataca 52 74 150496 3′UTR 3 835 gcctcataataagtgccata 47 75150497 3′UTR 3 843 ttttaatagcctcataataa 31 76 150498 3′UTR 3 849ggattcttttaatagcctca  38 77 150499 Intron: 10 790 cagcccttgccttctgctcg 86 78 Exon Junction 150500 Intron 1 10 3845 agtagctgggactacaggcg 0 79150501 Intron 1 10 4738 cattactttcctttaagaaa 63 80 150502 Intron 2 106248 aagatcactaaatgcaactt  57 81 150503 Intron 2 10 7023caggagaatcgcttgaacct 9 82 150504 Intron: 10 7397 ctggtacagcctatttataa 65 83 Exon Junction 150505 Intron 3 10 8053 gcttcacgtctacacactaa  28 84150506 Intron: 10 8206 tccaacatgcctaataatga  36 85    Exon Junction150507 mRNA 11 30 tggtacagccttctgctcga 0 86 150508 5′UTR 12 20taggccagacctccgcgcct 0 87 150509 5′UTR 12 26 actttataggccagacctcc 0 88150510 5′UTR 12 56 gacgcaaaccagcaccccgt  29 89 150511 5′UTR 12 73acgctgcaggagactacgac 81 90

As shown in Table 1, SEQ ID NOs 13, 15, 17, 18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27,29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45, 48, 52, 59, 60,61, 67, 69, 74, 78, 80, 81, 83 and 90 demonstrated at least 50%inhibition of human superoxide dismutase 1, soluble expression in thisassay and are therefore preferred. The target sites to which thesepreferred sequences are complementary are herein referred to as “activesites” and are therefore preferred sites for targeting by compounds ofthe present invention.

Example 16 Western Blot Analysis of Superoxide Dismutase 1, SolubleProtein Levels

Western blot analysis (immunoblot analysis) was carried out usingstandard methods. Cells (A549 and rat A10) were harvested 16-20 h afteroligonucleotide treatment, washed once with PBS, suspended in Laemmlibuffer (100 ul/well), boiled for 5 minutes and loaded on a 16% SDS-PAGEgel. Superoxide dismutase 1, soluble oligonucleotides used were ISIS146144 and ISIS 146145. A scrambled superoxide dismutase 1, solubleoligonucleotide was used as a negative control, as were cells nottreated with oligonucleotide (untreated control). Gels are run for 1.5hours at 150 V, and transferred to membrane for western blotting.Appropriate primary antibody directed to superoxide dismutase 1, solublewas used, with a radiolabelled or fluorescently labeled secondaryantibody directed against the primary antibody species. Bands werevisualized using a PHOSPHORIMAGER™ (Molecular Dynamics, SunnyvaleCalif.). ISIS 146144 and 146145 each inhibited production of superoxidedismutase 1, soluble by >75%, while the scrambled controloligonucleotide had no effect on levels superoxide dismutase 1, soluble.The untreated control cells also showed no reduction in levels ofsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble.

Example 17 Chimeric Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides Targeted to HumanSuperoxide Dismutase 1, Soluble Having 2′-MOE Wings and a Deoxy Gap

In accordance with the present invention, a second series ofoligonucleotides was designed to target different regions of the humansuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble RNA, using published sequences (GenBankaccession number X02317, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 3). Theoligonucleotides are shown in Table 2. “Target site” indicates the first(5′-most) nucleotide number on the particular target sequence to whichthe oligonucleotide binds. All compounds in Table 2 are chimericoligonucleotides (“gapmers”) 20 nucleotides in length, composed of acentral “gap” region consisting of ten 2′-deoxynucleotides, which isflanked on both sides (5′ and 3′ directions) by five-nucleotide “wings”.The wings are composed of 2′-methoxyethyl (2′-MOE)nucleotides. Theinternucleoside (backbone) linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S)throughout the oligonucleotide. All cytidine residues are5-methylcytidines.

TABLE 2Chimericphosphorothioate oligonucleotides targeted to human superoxide  dismutase 1, soluble having 2′-MOE wings and a deoxy gap TARGET SEQSEQ ID TARGET ID ISIS # REGION NO SITE SEQUENCE NO 331678 start 3 66GCACACGGCCTTCGTCGCCA 91 333605 coding 3 74 TTCAGCACGCACACGGCCTT 92333606 coding 3 76 CCTTCAGCACGCACACGGCC 93 333607 coding 3 77CCCTTCAGCACGCACACGGC 94 333608 coding 3 79 CGCCCTTCAGCACGCACACG 95333609 coding 3 80 TCGCCCTTCAGCACGCACAC 96 333610 coding 3 82CGTCGCCCTTCAGCACGCAC 97 333611 coding 3 83 CCGTCGCCCTTCAGCACGCA 98333612 coding 3 292 CAACATGCCTCTCTTCATCC 99 333613 coding 3 293CCAACATGCCTCTCTTCATC 100 333614 coding 3 294 TCCAACATGCCTCTCTTCAT 101333615 coding 3 295 CTCCAACATGCCTCTCTTCA 102 333616 coding 3 296TCTCCAACATGCCTCTCTTC 103 333617 coding 3 297 GTCTCCAACATGCCTCTCTT 104333618 coding 3 373 CTCCTGAGAGTGAGATCACA 105 333619 coding 3 374TCTCCTGAGAGTGAGATCAC 106 333620 coding 3 436 CACCTTTGCCCAAGTCATCT 107333621 coding 3 437 CCACCTTTGCCCAAGTCATC 108 333622 coding 3 438TCCACCTTTGCCCAAGTCAT  109 333623 coding 3 439 TTCCACCTTTGCCCAAGTCA 110333625 coding 3 441 ATTTCCACCTTTGCCCAAGT 111 333626 coding 3 442CATTTCCACCTTTGCCCAAG 112 333627 coding 3 443 TCATTTCCACCTTTGCCCAA 113333628 coding 3 444 TTCATTTCCACCTTTGCCCA 114 333629 coding 3 445CTTCATTTCCACCTTTGCCC 115 333630 coding 3 446 TCTTCATTTCCACCTTTGCC 116333631 coding 3 447 TTCTTCATTTCCACCTTTGC 117 333632 coding 3 448TTTCTTCATTTCCACCTTTG 118 333633 coding 3 449 CTTTCTTCATTTCCACCTTT 119333634 coding 3 450 ACTTTCTTCATTTCCACCTT 120 333635 coding 3 451TACTTTCTTCATTTCCACCT 121 333636 coding 3 452 GTACTTTCTTCATTTCCACC 122333637 coding 3 453 TGTACTTTCTTCATTTCCAC 123 333638 coding 3 454TTGTACTTTCTTCATTTCCA 124 333639 coding 3 455 TTTGTACTTTCTTCATTTCC 125333640 coding 3 456 CTTTGTACTTTCTTCATTTC 126 333641 coding 3 457TCTTTGTACTTTCTTCATTT 127 333642 coding 3 458 GTCTTTGTACTTTCTTCATT 128

Example 18 Phosphorothioate Oligodeoxynucleotides Targeted to HumanSuperoxide Dismutase 1, Soluble

In a further embodiment of the present invention, a third series ofoligonucleotides was designed to target different regions of the humansuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble RNA, using published sequences (GenBankaccession number X02317, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 3; genomicsequence representing nucleotides 15001 to 26000 of GenBank accessionnumber AP000213.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 10). Theoligonucleotides are shown in Table 3. “Target site” indicates the first(5′-most) nucleotide number on the particular target sequence to whichthe oligonucleotide binds. All compounds in Table 3 areoligodeoxynucleotides 20 nucleotides in length. The internucleoside(backbone) linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S) throughout theoligonucleotide. All cytidine residues are 5-methylcytidines.

TABLE 3 Phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides targeted to human superoxide dismutase 1, soluble TARGET SEQ SEQ ID TARGET IDISIS # REGION NO SITE SEQUENCE NO 336629 coding 3 127CATTACTTTCCTTCTGCTCG 129 336631 coding 3 294 TCCAACATGCCTCTCTTCAT 130336633 intron: 10 4738 CATTACTTTCCTTTAAGAAA 131 exon 336635 exon: 104835 CAACACCCACCTGCTGTATT 132 intron 336637 intron 10 7397CTGGTACAGCCTATTTATAA 133 336639 exon: 10 7468 CATCTTGTTACCTCTCTTCA 134intron 336641 intron: 10 8206 TCCAACATGCCTAATAATGA 135 exon 336643 exon10 8324 GAAAACTTACCACCAGTGTG 136 336645 intron: 10 9420TTTTCATGGACCTGTAAAAA 137 exon 336647 3′UTR 3 849 GGATTCTTTTAATAGCCTCA138

In addition to targeting human superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA, SEQID NO: 130 also targets rat superoxide dismutase 1, soluble.

In a further embodiment of the present invention, a fourth series ofoligonucleotides was designed to target different regions of the humansuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble RNA, using published sequences (GenBankaccession number X02317, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 3; genomicsequence representing nucleotides 15001 to 26000 of GenBank accessionnumber AP000213.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 10). Theoligonucleotides are shown in Table 4. “Target site” indicates the first(5′-most) nucleotide number on the particular target sequence to whichthe oligonucleotide binds. All compounds in Table 4 areoligodeoxynucleotides 15 nucleotides in length. The internucleoside(backbone) linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S) throughout theoligonucleotide. All cytidine residues are 5-methylcytidines.

TABLE 4 Phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides targeted tohuman superoxide dismutase 1, soluble TARGET SEQ SEQ ID TARGET ID ISIS #REGION NO SITE SEQUENCE NO 336630 coding 3 129 TACTTTCCTTCTGCT 139336632 coding 3 296 AACATGCCTCTCTTC 140 336634 intron:exon 10 4740TACTTTCCTTTAAGA 141 336636 exon:intron 10 4837 CACCCACCTGCTGTA 142336638 intron:exon 10 7399 GTACAGCCTATTTAT 143 336640 exon:intron 107470 CTTGTTACCTCTCTT 144 336642 intron 10 8208 AACATGCCTAATAAT 145336644 exon:intron 10 8326 AACTTACCACCAGTG 146 336646 intron:exon 109422 TCATGGACCTGTAAA 147 336648 exon 10 9858 TTCTTTTAATAGCCT 148

In addition to targeting human superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA, SEQID NO: 140 also targets rat superoxide dismutase 1, soluble.

Example 19 Antisense Inhibition of Rat Superoxide Dismutase 1, SolubleExpression by Chimeric Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides Having 2′-MOEWings and a Deoxy Gap

In accordance with the present invention, a series of oligonucleotideswas designed to target different regions of the rat superoxide dismutase1, soluble RNA, using published sequences (GenBank accession numberY00404.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 149; GenBank accessionnumber Z21917.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 150; GenBankaccession number Z21918.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 151;GenBank accession number X54986.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO:152; GenBank accession number Z21919.1, incorporated herein as SEQ IDNO: 153; GenBank accession number Z21920.1, incorporated herein as SEQID NO: 154; GenBank accession number Z21924.1, incorporated herein asSEQ ID NO: 155; GenBank accession number X55397.1, incorporated hereinas SEQ ID NO: 156). The oligonucleotides are shown in Table 5. “Targetsite” indicates the first (5′-most) nucleotide number on the particulartarget sequence to which the oligonucleotide binds. All compounds inTable 5 are chimeric oligonucleotides (“gapmers”) 20 nucleotides inlength, composed of a central “gap” region consisting of ten2′-deoxynucleotides, which is flanked on both sides (5′ and 3′directions) by five-nucleotide “wings”. The wings are composed of2′-methoxyethyl (2′-MOE)nucleotides. The internucleoside (backbone)linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S) throughout the oligonucleotide. Allcytidine residues are 5-methylcytidines.

The compounds were analyzed for their effect on rat superoxide dismutase1, soluble in primary rat hepatocytes. Primary rat hepatocytes wereprepared from Sprague-Dawley rats purchased from Charles River Labs(Wilmington, Mass.) and were routinely cultured in DMEM, high glucose(Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.) supplemented with 10% fetalbovine serum (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.), 100 units perml penicillin, and 100 micrograms per ml streptomycin (Gibco/LifeTechnologies, Gaithersburg, Md.).

Cells were seeded into 96-well plates (Falcon-Primaria #353047, BDBiosciences, Bedford, Mass.) at a density of 4000-6000 cells/well foruse in antisense oligonucleotide transfection. For cells grown in96-well plates, cells were treated with 100 uL of OPTI-MEM-1 containing2.5 ug/mL LIPOFECTIN (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) and thedesired concentration of oligonucleotide. Cells were treated and dataare obtained in triplicate. After 4 hours of treatment at 37° C., themedium was replaced with fresh medium. Cells were harvested 16-24 hoursafter oligonucleotide treatment.

ISIS 18078 was used as a control oligonucleotide. ISIS 18078(GTGCGCGCGAGCCCGAAATC, SEQ ID NO: 157) is a chimeric oligonucleotide(“gapmers”) 20 nucleotides in length, composed of a central “gap” regionconsisting of ten 2′-deoxynucleotides, which is flanked on both sides(5′ and 3′ directions) by five-nucleotide “wings”. The wings arecomposed of 2′-methoxyethyl (2′-MOE)nucleotides. The internucleoside(backbone) linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S) throughout theoligonucleotide. All cytidine residues are 5-methylcytidines.

The compounds were analyzed for their effect on rat superoxide dismutase1, soluble mRNA levels in rat hepatocytes by quantitative real-time PCRas described in other examples herein. Probes and primers to mousesuperoxide dismutase 1 were designed to hybridize to a rat superoxidedismutase 1, soluble sequence, using published sequence information(incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 149). For rat superoxide dismutase 1,soluble the PCR primers were: forward primer: TGCTGAAGGGCGACGG (SEQ IDNO: 159) reverse primer: GTTCACCGCTTGCCTTCTG (SEQ ID NO: 160) and thePCR probe was: FAM-CCGGTGCAGGGCGTCATTCACTT-TAMRA (SEQ ID NO: 161) whereFAM is the fluorescent reporter dye and TAMRA is the quencher dye. Genetarget quantities obtained by real time RT-PCR are normalized byquantifying total RNA using RiboGreen™ (Molecular Probes, Inc. Eugene,Oreg.). In this assay, 170 μL of RiboGreen™ working reagent (RiboGreen™reagent diluted 1:350 in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5) is pipettedinto a 96-well plate containing 30 μL purified, cellular RNA. The plateis read in a CytoFluor 4000 (PE Applied Biosystems) with excitation at485 nm and emission at 530 nm

Data are averages from two experiments in which primary rat hepatocyteswere treated with the antisense oligonucleotides of the presentinvention at a dose of 150 nM. If present, “N.D.” indicates “no data”.

TABLE 5Inhibition of rat superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA levels by chimeric phosphorothioate oligonucleotides having 2′-MOE wings and a deoxy gapTARGET SEQ SEQ ID TARGET % ID ISIS # REGION NO SITE SEQUENCE INHIB NO146137 5′UTR 149 4 CGCAGGAAACGAAGGTGCAA 82 162 146138 5′UTR 149 6GCCGCAGGAAACGAAGGTGC 88 163 146139  5′UTR 149 49 CTCGGAACCTGGGAGAGCAA 40164 146140 5′UTR 149 85 TTCATCGCCATGCTTCCCCG 79 165 146141 5′UTR 149 91ACGGCCTTCATCGCCATGCT 88 166 146142 start 149 94 CACACGGCCTTCATCGCCAT 79167 146143 coding 149 102 TCAGCACGCACACGGCCTTC 83 168 146144 coding 149107 GCCCTTCAGCACGCACACGG 95 169 146145 coding 149 110GTCGCCCTTCAGCACGCACA 91 170 146146 coding 149 115 GGACCGTCGCCCTTCAGCAC97 171 146147 coding 149 143 CTGCTCGAAGTGAATGACGC 97 172 146148 coding149 151 CTTGCCTTCTGCTCGAAGTG 89 173 146149 coding 149 156CACCGCTTGCCTTCTGCTCG 92 174 146150 coding 149 161 TGGTTCACCGCTTGCCTTCT78 175 146151 coding 149 166 ACAACTGGTTCACCGCTTGC 90 176 146152 coding149 183 TAATCTGTCCTGACACCACA 83 177 146153 coding 149 188TCCTGTAATCTGTCCTGACA 84 178 146154 coding 149 192 TTAATCCTGTAATCTGTCCT85 179 146155 coding 149 208 CCATGCTCGCCTTCAGTTAA 80 180 146156 coding149 217 ACATGGAACCCATGCTCGCC 82 181 146157 coding 149 225ATTGATGGACATGGAACCCA 87 182 146158 coding 149 244 CCTTGTGTATTGTCCCCATA86 183 146159 coding 149 249 TACAGCCTTGTGTATTGTCC 77 184 146160 coding149 278 GTGAGGATTAAAATGAGGTC 70 185 146161 coding 149 284CTTAGAGTGAGGATTAAAAT 69 186 146162 coding 149 289 TGTTTCTTAGAGTGAGGATT72 187 146163 coding 149 334 TTGCCCAGGTCTCCAACATG 79 188 146164 coding149 337 ACATTGCCCAGGTCTCCAAC 78 189 146165 coding 149 359CACACCGTCCTTTCCAGCAG 82 190 146166 coding 149 364 TTGGCCACACCGTCCTTTCC82 191 146167 coding 149 367 ACATTGGCCACACCGTCCTT 74 192 146168 coding149 369 ACACATTGGCCACACCGTCC 84 193 146169 coding 149 374AATGGACACATTGGCCACAC 82 194 146170 coding 149 379 TCTTCAATGGACACATTGGC78 195 146171 coding 149 384 CACGATCTTCAATGGACACA  86 196 146172 coding149 387 TCACACGATCTTCAATGGAC 76 197 146173 coding 149 389GATCACACGATCTTCAATGG 88 198 146174 coding 149 421 CGGCCAATGATGGAATGCTC85 199 146175 coding 149 426 TAGTACGGCCAATGATGGAA 87 200 146176 coding149 439 TCGTGGACCACCATAGTACG 87 201 146177 coding 149 442TTCTCGTGGACCACCATAGT 84 202 146178 coding 149 505 CGGCTTCCAGCATTTCCAGT77 203 146179 coding 149 510 CCAAGCGGCTTCCAGCATTT 76 204 146180 coding149 516 CACAAGCCAAGCGGCTTCCA 77 205 146181 coding 149 522TCACACCACAAGCCAAGCGG 74 206 146182 coding 149 532 GCAATCCCAATCACACCACA76 207 146183 coding 149 535 TGGGCAATCCCAATCACACC 82 208 146184 coding149 539 TTATTGGGCAATCCCAATCA 87 209 146185 coding 149 553CACATAGGGAATGTTTATTG 81 210 146186 3′UTR 149 559 TCAGACCACATAGGGAATGT 71211 146187 3′UTR 149 563 AGACTCAGACCACATAGGGA 64 212 146188 3′UTR 149567 TCTGAGACTCAGACCACATA 83 213 146189 3′UTR 149 583CAGGACAGCAGATGAGTCTG 82 214 146190 3′UTR 149 586 TAGCAGGACAGCAGATGAGT 89215 146191 3′UTR 149 592 ACAGTTTAGCAGGACAGCAG 90 216 146192 3′UTR 149595 TCTACAGTTTAGCAGGACAG 91 217 146193 3′UTR 149 622GATTACAGTTTAATGGTTTG 57 218 146194 intron 150 1996 TAGCGATGCAAACTGCTCTC0 219 146195 intron 150 2002 ATAGGATAGCGATGCAAACT 38 220 146196exon:intron 151 521 TAGGACCTACCTTGTGTATT 19 221 146197 exon:intron 152235 TAAGACTTACCTTGTGTATT 11 222 146198 intron 152 280ACTCTGACCCATTCATCTCA 55 223 146199 exon:intron 153 321GCTGCTCACCTCTCTTCATC 52 224 146200 intron 153 594 TTGCTAGTGACGTGATAGTA51 225 146201 intron 153 659 ATACAAACGGAATCTCAACT 57 226 146202 intron153 714 CTCCAGCTCATTCAAAGAGC 21 227 146203 intron 153 743AGTATGCAGCTCCTGATTAC 24 228 146204 intron 153 764 GAAGGCACTTCGAGGTTACG45 229 146205 exon:intron 154 142 GGAAACTTACCACCATAGTA 46 230 146206exon:intron 154 145 TATGGAAACTTACCACCATA 66 231 146207 intron 154 305GCAAATTAATTCTTTACTAT 20 232 146208 intron 154 391 GTATCCTCAACTCAGATCCA79 233 146209 intron:exon 155 154 TCTCGTGGACCTTTGAAAAG 62 234 146210intron 156 33 AGCAGACTACTAAGTGTTTC 44 235 146211 intron 156 52TTTTATGCTATCAGCTAAAA 27 236 146212 intron 156 69 TAAATCAATAAGCTAATTTT 9237 146213 intron 156 84 GTTCAAATCTATTAGTAAAT 36 238 146214 intron:exon156 187 CTCGTGGACCTTTGAAAAGA 79 239

In addition to targeting rat superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA, SEQID Nos 168, 169 and 170 also target human superoxide dismutase 1,soluble.

As shown in Table 5, SEQ ID Nos 162, 163, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170,171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184,185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198,199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212,213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 231, 233, 234 and 239 demonstrated at least 60%inhibition of rat superoxide dismutase 1, soluble expression in thisassay and are therefore preferred. More preferred are SEQ ID NOs: 217,216, and 215. The target sites to which these preferred sequences arecomplementary are herein referred to as “active sites” and are thereforepreferred sites for targeting by compounds of the present invention.

Example 20 Chimeric Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides Targeted to RatSuperoxide Dismutase 1, Soluble Having 2′-MOE Wings and a Deoxy Gap

In a further embodiment of the present invention, a second series ofoligonucleotides was designed to target different regions of the ratsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble RNA, using published sequences (GenBankaccession number Y00404.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 149). Theoligonucleotides are shown in Table 6. “Target site” indicates the first(5′-most) nucleotide number on the particular target sequence to whichthe oligonucleotide binds. All compounds in Table 6 are chimericoligonucleotides (“gapmers”) 20 nucleotides in length, composed of acentral “gap” region consisting of ten 2′-deoxynucleotides, which isflanked on both sides (5′ and 3′ directions) by five-nucleotide “wings”.The wings are composed of 2′-methoxyethyl (2′-MOE)nucleotides. Theinternucleoside (backbone) linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S)throughout the oligonucleotide. All cytidine residues are5-methylcytidines.

TABLE 6Chimeric phosphorothioate oligonucleotides targeted to rat superoxide  dismutase 1, soluble having 2′-MOE wings and a deoxy gap TARGET SEQSEQ ID TARGET ID ISIS # REGION NO SITE SEQUENCE NO 195743 5′UTR 149 40TGGGAGAGCAAAAAGCAAGG 240 195744 5′UTR 149 45 GAACCTGGGAGAGCAAAAAG 241195745 5′UTR 149 51 GCCTCGGAACCTGGGAGAGC 242 195746 5′UTR 149 53CGGCCTCGGAACCTGGGAGA 243 195747 5′UTR 149 55 GGCGGCCTCGGAACCTGGGA 244195748 5′UTR 149 77 CATGCTTCCCCGGGAGACGC 245 195749 5′UTR 149 81TCGCCATGCTTCCCCGGGAG 246 195750 5′UTR 149 83 CATCGCCATGCTTCCCCGGG 247195751 5′UTR 149 88 GCCTTCATCGCCATGCTTCC 248 195752 coding 149 99GCACGCACACGGCCTTCATC 249 195753 coding 149 104 CTTCAGCACGCACACGGCCT 250195754 coding 149 145 TTCTGCTCGAAGTGAATGAC 251 195755 coding 149 149TGCCTTCTGCTCGAAGTGAA 252 195756 coding 149 153 CGCTTGCCTTCTGCTCGAAG 253195757 coding 149 158 TTCACCGCTTGCCTTCTGCT 254 195758 coding 149 168CCACAACTGGTTCACCGCTT 255 195759 coding 149 170 CACCACAACTGGTTCACCGC 256195760 coding 149 178 TGTCCTGACACCACAACTGG 257 195761 coding 149 180TCTGTCCTGACACCACAACT 258 195762 coding 149 185 TGTAATCTGTCCTGACACCA 259195763 coding 149 190 AATCCTGTAATCTGTCCTGA 260 195764 coding 149 194AGTTAATCCTGTAATCTGTC 261 195765 coding 149 196 TCAGTTAATCCTGTAATCTG 262195766 coding 149 210 ACCCATGCTCGCCTTCAGTT 263 195767 coding 149 215ATGGAACCCATGCTCGCCTT 264 195768 coding 149 219 GGACATGGAACCCATGCTCG 265195769 coding 149 223 TGATGGACATGGAACCCATG 266 195770 coding 149 228CATATTGATGGACATGGAAC 267 195771 coding 149 230 CCCATATTGATGGACATGGA 268195772 coding 149 232 TCCCCATATTGATGGACATG 269 195773 coding 149 234TGTCCCCATATTGATGGACA 270 195774 coding 149 236 ATTGTCCCCATATTGATGGA 271195775 coding 149 241 TGTGTATTGTCCCCATATTG 272 195776 coding 149 246AGCCTTGTGTATTGTCCCCA 273 195777 coding 149 286 TTCTTAGAGTGAGGATTAAA 274195778 coding 149 291 CATGTTTCTTAGAGTGAGGA 275 195779 coding 149 293GCCATGTTTCTTAGAGTGAG 276 195780 coding 149 297 GACCGCCATGTTTCTTAGAG 277195781 coding 149 299 TGGACCGCCATGTTTCTTAG 278 195782 coding 149 301GCTGGACCGCCATGTTTCTT 279 195783 coding 149 303 CCGCTGGACCGCCATGTTTC 280195784 coding 149 305 ATCCGCTGGACCGCCATGTT 281 195785 coding 149 307TCATCCGCTGGACCGCCATG 282 195786 coding 149 309 CTTCATCCGCTGGACCGCCA 283195787 coding 149 313 CTCTCTTCATCCGCTGGACC 284 195788 coding 149 315GCCTCTCTTCATCCGCTGGA 285 195789 coding 149 339 CCACATTGCCCAGGTCTCCA 286195790 coding 149 341 AGCCACATTGCCCAGGTCTC 287 195791 coding 149 353GTCCTTTCCAGCAGCCACAT 288 195792 coding 149 356 ACCGTCCTTTCCAGCAGCCA 289195793 coding 149 371 GGACACATTGGCCACACCGT 290 195794 coding 149 377TTCAATGGACACATTGGCCA 291 195795 coding 149 423 TACGGCCAATGATGGAATGC 292195796 coding 149 437 GTGGACCACCATAGTACGGC 293 195797 coding 149 503GCTTCCAGCATTTCCAGTCT 294 195798 coding 149 512 AGCCAAGCGGCTTCCAGCAT 295195799 coding 149 518 ACCACAAGCCAAGCGGCTTC 296 195800 stop 149 537ATTGGGCAATCCCAATCACA 297 195801 stop 149 541 GTTTATTGGGCAATCCCAAT 298195802 stop 149 555 ACCACATAGGGAATGTTTAT 299 195803 stop 149 557AGACCACATAGGGAATGTTT 300 195804 3′UTR 149 561 ACTCAGACCACATAGGGAAT 301195805 3′UTR 149 565 TGAGACTCAGACCACATAGG 302 195806 3′UTR 149 571TGAGTCTGAGACTCAGACCA 303 195807 3′UTR 149 573 GATGAGTCTGAGACTCAGAC 304195808 3′UTR 149 575 CAGATGAGTCTGAGACTCAG 305 195809 3′UTR 149 577AGCAGATGAGTCTGAGACTC 306 195810 3′UTR 149 581 GGACAGCAGATGAGTCTGAG 307195811 3′UTR 149 588 TTTAGCAGGACAGCAGATGA 308 195812 3′UTR 149 590AGTTTAGCAGGACAGCAGAT 309 195813 3′UTR 149 597 TTTCTACAGTTTAGCAGGAC 310195814 3′UTR 149 599 TTTTTCTACAGTTTAGCAGG 311 195815 3′UTR 149 626TTAAGATTACAGTTTAATGG 312 195816 3′UTR 149 628 TGTTAAGATTACAGTTTAAT 313333624 coding 149 469 TTTCCACCTTTGCCCAAGTC 314

In addition to targeting rat superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA, SEQID Nos 250 and 314 also target human superoxide dismutase 1, soluble.

In a further embodiment of the present invention, an oligonucleotide wasdesigned to target the rat superoxide dismutase 1, soluble RNA, usingpublished sequences (GenBank accession number Y00404.1, incorporatedherein as SEQ ID NO: 149). This compound consists of the sequenceCTTCAGCACGCACACGGC (SEQ ID NO: 315). This compound is a chimericoligonucleotide (“gapmers”) 18 nucleotides in length, composed of acentral “gap” region consisting of ten 2′-deoxynucleotides, which isflanked on both sides (5′ and 3′ directions) by four-nucleotide “wings”.The wings are composed of 2′-methoxyethyl (2′-MOE)nucleotides. Theinternucleoside (backbone) linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S)throughout the oligonucleotide. All cytidine residues are5-methylcytidines. The “target site”, which indicates the first(5′-most) nucleotide number on the particular target sequence to whichthe oligonucleotide binds, is nucleotide 105 of SEQ ID NO: 149.

Example 21 Phosphorothioate Oligodeoxynucleotides Targeted to RatSuperoxide Dismutase 1, Soluble

In a further embodiment of the present invention, a third series ofoligonucleotides was designed to target different regions of the ratsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble RNA, using published sequences (GenBankaccession number Y00404.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 149;GenBank accession number Z21924.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO:155; GenBank accession number Z21920.1, incorporated herein as SEQ IDNO: 154; GenBank accession number NM_(—)017050.1, incorporated herein asSEQ ID NO: 316; genomic sequence representing nucleotides 5965000 to5972000 of GenBank accession number NW_(—)042743.1, incorporated hereinas SEQ ID NO: 317). The oligonucleotides are shown in Table 7. “Targetsite” indicates the first (5′-most) nucleotide number on the particulartarget sequence to which the oligonucleotide binds. All compounds inTable 7 are oligodeoxynucleotides 20 nucleotides in length. Theinternucleoside (backbone) linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S)throughout the oligonucleotide. All cytidine residues are5-methylcytidines.

TABLE 7 Phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides targeted to rat superoxide dismutase 1, soluble TARGET SEQ SEQ ID TARGET IDISIS # REGION NO SITE SEQUENCE NO 336649 coding 149 156CACCGCTTGCCTTCTGCTCG 318 336651 coding 316 441 TCTCGTGGACCACCATAGTA 319336653 intron 317 636 TGCAAAACGAGGGCCCAGCG 320 336655 exon: 317 802GGGCCTTGCCTTCTGCTCGA 321 intron 336657 intron: 317 2598CACCGCTTGCCTTTATTTAA 322 exon 336659 exon: 317 2696 TTAAGACTTACCTTGTGTAT323 intron 336661 intron: 317 4191 GTGGTACAGCCTATTTACCA 324 exon 336663exon: 317 4261 TGCTGCTCACCTCTCTTCAT 325 intron 336665 intron: 317 4949TCCAACATGCCTAACATTAA 326 exon 336667 exon: 154 142 GGAAACTTACCACCATAGTA327 intron 336669 intron 154 154 TCTCGTGGACCTTTGAAAAG 328

In a further embodiment of the present invention, a third series ofoligonucleotides was designed to target different regions of the ratsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble RNA, using published sequences (GenBankaccession number Y00404.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 149;GenBank accession number Z21920.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO:154; GenBank accession number Z21924.1, incorporated herein as SEQ IDNO: 155; GenBank accession number NM_(—)017050.1, incorporated herein asSEQ ID NO: 316; genomic sequence representing nucleotides 5965000 to5972000 of GenBank accession number NW_(—)042743.1, incorporated hereinas SEQ ID NO: 317). The oligonucleotides are shown in Table 8. “Targetsite” indicates the first (5′-most) nucleotide number on the particulartarget sequence to which the oligonucleotide binds. All compounds inTable 8 are oligodeoxynucleotides 15 nucleotides in length. Theinternucleoside (backbone) linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S)throughout the oligonucleotide. All cytidine residues are5-methylcytidines.

TABLE 8 Phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides targeted torat superoxide dismutase 1, soluble TARGET SEQ SEQ TARGET ID ISIS #REGION ID NO SITE SEQUENCE NO 336650 coding 316 158 CGCTTGCCTTCTGCT 329336652 coding 316 443 CGTGGACCACCATAG 330 336654 intron 317 638AAAACGAGGGCCCAG 331 336656 exon:intron 317 804 CCTTGCCTTCTGCTC 332336658 intron:exon 317 2600 CGCTTGCCTTTATTT 333 336660 exon:intron 3172698 AGACTTACCTTGTGT 334 336662 intron:exon 317 4193 GTACAGCCTATTTAC 335336664 exon:intron 317 4263 TGCTCACCTCTCTTC 336 336666 intron:exon 3174951 AACATGCCTAACATT 337 336668 exon:intron 317 5069 AACTTACCACCATAG 338336670 intron:exon 317 6017 CGTGGACCTTTGAAA 339

In addition to targeting rat superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA, SEQID NO: 130 also targets human superoxide dismutase 1, soluble.

Example 22 Inhibition of Superoxide Dismutase 1, Soluble mRNA in RatBrain Following Intraventricular Administration

Oligonucleotides that target the expression of proteins in the brainrepresent a potential means of treating degenerative neurologicdisorders associated with aberrant proteins such as superoxide dismutase1, soluble that are associated with familial ALS. To be effective inALS, they would need to reach affected tissues.

Superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA levels were measured in rat brainfollowing intraventricular administration. Superoxide dismutase 1,soluble levels were measured in both rat spinal cord and rat brainfollowing administration of ISIS 146192. Administration was performeddaily at either 33 mg/day or 50 mg/day for 14 days. The results areshown in FIGS. 1-4. There are two sets of bars for each dose sinceduplicate treatment groups of 6 per group were used. Expression isrelative to PTEN mRNA to demonstrate specificity. mRNA was normalized toribogreen or beta-actin.

The results show that intraventricular administration of ISIS 146192significantly reduced superoxide dismutase 1, soluble mRNA levels inboth the spinal cord and right temporal parietal section of the brain.Thus, oligonucleotides are preferentially taken up by motor neurons inthe brain stem and spinal cord, suggesting that cell barriers are not anobstacle. Thus, intraventricular administration of superoxide dismutase1, soluble antisense oligonucleotides has therapeutic implications intreatment of ALS and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Example 23 Design and Screening of Duplexed Antisense CompoundsTargeting Superoxide Dismutase-1, Soluble

In accordance with the present invention, a series of nucleic acidduplexes comprising the antisense compounds of the present invention andtheir complements can be designed to target superoxide dismutase-1,soluble. The nucleobase sequence of the antisense strand of the duplexcomprises at least a portion of an oligonucleotide to superoxidedismutase-1, soluble as described herein. The ends of the strands may bemodified by the addition of one or more natural or modified nucleobasesto form an overhang. The sense strand of the dsRNA is then designed andsynthesized as the complement of the antisense strand and may alsocontain modifications or additions to either terminus. For example, inone embodiment, both strands of the dsRNA duplex would be complementaryover the central nucleobases, each having overhangs at one or bothtermini. For example, a duplex comprising an antisense strand having thesequence CGAGAGGCGGACGGGACCG (SEQ ID NO: 342) and having atwo-nucleobase overhang of deoxythymidine(dT) would have the followingstructure:

RNA strands of the duplex can be synthesized by methods disclosed hereinor purchased from Dharmacon Research Inc., (Lafayette, Colo.). Oncesynthesized, the complementary strands are annealed. The single strandsare aliquoted and diluted to a concentration of 50 uM. Once diluted, 30uL of each strand is combined with 15 uL of a 5× solution of annealingbuffer. The final concentration of said buffer is 100 mM potassiumacetate, 30 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.4, and 2 mM magnesium acetate. The finalvolume is 75 uL. This solution is incubated for 1 minute at 90° C. andthen centrifuged for 15 seconds. The tube is allowed to sit for 1 hourat 37° C. at which time the dsRNA duplexes are used in experimentation.The final concentration of the dsRNA duplex is 20 uM. This solution canbe stored frozen (−20° C.) and freeze-thawed up to 5 times.

Once prepared, the duplexed antisense compounds are evaluated for theirability to modulate superoxide dismutase-1, soluble expression accordingto the protocols described herein.

Example 26 Design of Phenotypic Assays and In Vivo Studies for the Useof Superoxide Dismutase-1, Soluble Inhibitors Phenotypic Assays

Once superoxide dismutase-1, soluble inhibitors have been identified bythe methods disclosed herein, the compounds are further investigated inone or more phenotypic assays, each having measurable endpointspredictive of efficacy in the treatment of a particular disease state orcondition. Phenotypic assays, kits and reagents for their use are wellknown to those skilled in the art and are herein used to investigate therole and/or association superoxide dismutase-1, soluble in health anddisease. Representative phenotypic assays, which can be purchased fromany one of several commercial vendors, include those for determiningcell viability, cytotoxicity, proliferation or cell survival (MolecularProbes, Eugene, Oreg.; PerkinElmer, Boston, Mass.), protein-based assaysincluding enzymatic assays (Panvera, LLC, Madison, Wis.; BD Biosciences,Franklin Lakes, N.J.; Oncogene Research Products, San Diego, Calif.),cell regulation, signal transduction, inflammation, oxidative processesand apoptosis (Assay Designs Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich.), triglycerideaccumulation (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.), angiogenesis assays, tubeformation assays, cytokine and hormone assays and metabolic assays(Chemicon International Inc., Temecula, Calif.; Amersham Biosciences,Piscataway, N.J.).

In one non-limiting example, cells determined to be appropriate for aparticular phenotypic assay (i.e., MCF-7 cells selected for breastcancer studies; adipocytes for obesity studies) are treated withsuperoxide dismutase-1, soluble inhibitors identified from the in vitrostudies as well as control compounds at optimal concentrations which aredetermined by the methods described above. At the end of the treatmentperiod, treated and untreated cells are analyzed by one or more methodsspecific for the assay to determine phenotypic outcomes and endpoints.

Phenotypic endpoints include changes in cell morphology over time ortreatment dose as well as changes in levels of cellular components suchas proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, hormones, saccharides or metals.Measurements of cellular status which include pH, stage of the cellcycle, intake or excretion of biological indicators by the cell, arealso endpoints of interest. Analysis of the genotype of the cell(measurement of the expression of one or more of the genes of the cell)after treatment is also used as an indicator of the efficacy or potencyof superoxide dismutase-1, soluble inhibitors. Hallmark genes, or thosegenes suspected to be associated with a specific disease state,condition, or phenotype, are measured in both treated and untreatedcells.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of inhibiting the expression ofsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble in brain and spinal cord, comprisingintraventricularly administering to an animal an antisenseoligonucleotide 8 to 50 nucleobases in length targeted to the 3′untranslated region (UTR) of a nucleic acid molecule encoding humansuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble (SEQ ID NO: 3) so that expression ofsuperoxide dismutase 1, soluble is inhibited.
 2. The method of claim 1,wherein said antisense oligonucleotide is targeted to nucleobases535-868 of SEQ ID NO:
 3. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the antisenseoligonucleotide comprises at least one modified internucleoside linkage.4. The method of claim 3, wherein the modified internucleoside linkageis a phosphorothioate linkage.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein theantisense oligonucleotide comprises at least one modified sugar moiety.6. The method of claim 5, wherein the modified sugar moiety is a2′-O-methoxyethyl sugar moiety.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein theantisense oligonucleotide comprises at least one modified nucleobase. 8.The method of claim 7, wherein the modified nucleobase is a5-methylcytosine.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the antisenseoligonucleotide is a chimeric oligonucleotide.